Replies: 14
| visibility 1
|
Team Captain [473]
TigerPulse: 64%
18
|
I'm sure I'll be land blasted for saying this....
Dec 23, 2013, 2:37 PM
|
|
Anyone else feeling like we are going to be embarrassed again in the Orange Bowl? I was really hoping we would play Alabama... Honestly I think we stand a better chance against any team that runs a traditional pro style.... Ya' know, QB stays in the pocket, running back runs the ball offense. I think if SC didn't have Shaw running all over us- we win 2 of last 3 games. I think that Clemson could hold their own with ANY team in the nation that doesn't have a running QB. OSU will school us in the zone read like never before. They will probably break WV bowl points record, and may not attempt a pass. But, on the other hand having a month to get to work on defending the zone read can only help us in the future... It ain't going away. Unc, NC ST. & SC will continue to run it more and more. Either way, I'm pulling for redemption for Tajh, and the Tigers to show folks that Clemson can beat a really good team, and deserves to be talked about every year for the good stuff. Not just being a highlight reel for FSU, and SC.
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1914]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
If we don't turn the ball over, we'll make it a game.***
Dec 23, 2013, 2:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2434]
TigerPulse: 93%
32
|
OS been overrated all yr. We can beat them dude***
Dec 23, 2013, 2:48 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [26454]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 14289
Joined: 2008
|
Ya'll need to worry about Wisconsin dirtpecker.***
Dec 23, 2013, 2:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Enthusiast [123]
TigerPulse: 22%
11
|
Do you ever tire of posting...
Dec 23, 2013, 3:27 PM
|
|
"tell 'em coot!"
or
"worry about ### dirtpecker!"
You have the posting IQ of a second grader. And I apologize to most second graders I just offended.
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [6938]
TigerPulse: 88%
41
Posts: 22593
Joined: 2003
|
Re: Second graders only come on a Clemson board and run
Dec 23, 2013, 3:32 PM
|
|
down the Tigers. Get someone to explain it to you.
|
|
|
|
 |
Enthusiast [123]
TigerPulse: 22%
11
|
I haven't seen anyone in this thread running down the Tigers
Dec 23, 2013, 3:44 PM
|
|
I'm sure most disagree with the OP though.
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [6933]
TigerPulse: 99%
41
|
Just look at the percentages - you coot 26%! Lowest I have
Dec 23, 2013, 4:12 PM
[ in reply to Do you ever tire of posting... ] |
|
ever seen. Coot+ We don't give a crap what you say!
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [2833]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
|
|
|
 |
Team Captain [473]
TigerPulse: 64%
18
|
Re: Ya'll need to worry about Wisconsin dirtpecker.***
Dec 23, 2013, 4:12 PM
[ in reply to Ya'll need to worry about Wisconsin dirtpecker.*** ] |
|
Yep, everybody who asks a question you don't like or doesn't pump sunshine into eveything the tigers do is a coot. Just like everybody who disagrees with anything Obama does is a racist. You caught me. Your perceptive genius could land you a job with the NSA.
|
|
|
|
 |
Head Coach [790]
TigerPulse: 94%
22
|
We can beat this overrated OSU team no doubt!
Dec 23, 2013, 2:55 PM
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
 |
Scout Team [171]
TigerPulse: 42%
12
|
Re: I'm sure I'll be land blasted for saying this....
Dec 23, 2013, 3:00 PM
|
|
Veneble will need to change the run D philosophy. You cant stick 7/8 in the box and beat good teams because they have other weapons. SC game shows that. It worked against GT because they had no other options, but OSU will exploit the secondary and run on the edges.
|
|
|
|
 |
Junkie [515]
TigerPulse: 95%
19
|
As of right now, I'd favor OSU in this game
Dec 23, 2013, 4:06 PM
|
|
And come January 4, I hope that my Tigers will have proved me wrong.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [5921]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
No - I'm Not Worried.
Dec 23, 2013, 4:31 PM
|
|
If Chad Morris calls a good game and we don't turn the ball over - WE WIN!
|
|
|
|
 |
Standout [305]
TigerPulse: 100%
15
|
Not worried
Dec 23, 2013, 6:30 PM
|
|
I'm pretty sure GT's QB ran...or tried to. Besides...if Tajh is on, they won't be able to keep up with the points we will put up.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 14
| visibility 1
|
|
|