|
Replies: 15
| visibility 1955
|
Game Changer [1604]
TigerPulse: 99%
31
|
Adam Randall slander needs to stop
25
25
Sep 15, 2025, 8:05 PM
|
|
Not sure why we just act like he’s not good. Like sure he is an inexperienced back but he’s a dang good inexperienced back that plays his heart out and is the reason we came back and won vs Troy and one of the only reasons we were in the GT game. Hes one of the only players on this team that shows me he really wants to win.
|
|
|
|
 |
Redshirt [90]
TigerPulse: 100%
10
|
Re: Adam Randall slander needs to stop
2
Sep 15, 2025, 8:06 PM
|
|
Agree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [22]
TigerPulse: 100%
3
|
Re: Adam Randall slander needs to stop
3
Sep 15, 2025, 8:10 PM
|
|
5.1 a carry, plus a threat in the receiving game, not sure why we can’t get him more touches,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22126]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
|
Re: Adam Randall slander needs to stop
2
Sep 15, 2025, 8:23 PM
|
|
Not to mention some stellar blocks he made. I’m very pleased with AR. Westco as well. That’s about all on offense though. Heldt and Brown on defense have done well also. Hannafin has shown flashes. Capehart has done well. That’s about it. We have a lot of work to do
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [31005]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 21450
Joined: 2024
|
Re: Adam Randall slander needs to stop
1
Sep 15, 2025, 8:50 PM
|
|
Capehart has been our best DL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1642]
TigerPulse: 87%
31
|
Re: Adam Randall slander needs to stop
Sep 15, 2025, 8:56 PM
[ in reply to Re: Adam Randall slander needs to stop ] |
|
Because our coaches have little clue on schemes GT is not as talented as Clemson but they have better offensive schemes our offense is an offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [83849]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 31325
Joined: 2018
|
Second best based on grading.
Sep 15, 2025, 10:39 PM
|
|
Heldt, our portal end is the best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5394]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: Adam Randall slander needs to stop
2
Sep 15, 2025, 8:25 PM
|
|
I am on record for bashing this team, but I have not bashed Adam Randall. I have not understood the constant negative comments about Adam. He is one of the few bright spots on this team and if it weren’t for him, we’ve been blown out of every game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2034]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Adam Randall slander needs to stop
1
Sep 15, 2025, 8:27 PM
|
|
Who is bashing him?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [31005]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 21450
Joined: 2024
|
Re: Adam Randall slander needs to stop
2
Sep 15, 2025, 8:51 PM
|
|
It happens all of the time in here. People acting like he isn't a viable option. He is quality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1748]
TigerPulse: 93%
31
|
Re: Adam Randall slander needs to stop
1
Sep 15, 2025, 8:54 PM
|
|
Agee
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13557]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 15782
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Adam Randall slander needs to stop
1
Sep 15, 2025, 8:55 PM
|
|
Yep.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7117]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: Adam Randall slander needs to stop
Sep 15, 2025, 8:56 PM
|
|
He’s too easily negated by defenses that force Cade to run. QB had 17 carries versus RB1 with 15. Now if that was Deshaun I wouldn’t mind but Cade is still spindly and just not physical in the run game. QB draws and runs are staples of Dabo’s offense where he prefers they run it more than the RB and in most key short yardage situations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [28437]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16783
Joined: 2018
|
Re: Adam Randall slander needs to stop
1
Sep 15, 2025, 9:00 PM
|
|
Big heart and hustle, no issue with me. But I do blame our staff for putting us in the position of having to train on the job a WR to be RB1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1561]
TigerPulse: 100%
30
|
Re: Adam Randall slander needs to stop
1
Sep 15, 2025, 10:46 PM
|
|
He’s been one of the few consistent guys
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1154]
TigerPulse: 100%
26
|
Totally agree
2
Sep 15, 2025, 10:52 PM
|
|
Riley has a Deebo Samuel type talent and is severely underutilizing him. I wonder if Adam doesn’t have a better pro career than college when he’s given the coaching needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 1955
|
|
|
50
