This loss had nothing to do with coaching.
storage
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Replies: 96
| visibility 5138
|
Freshman [-74]
TigerPulse: 66%
-1
|
This loss had nothing to do with coaching.
Nov 26, 2022, 3:52 PM
|
|
You have to be blind to not see the elephant in the room.
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1736]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: This loss had nothing to do with coaching.
Nov 26, 2022, 3:53 PM
|
|
I’d call bad QB play and ball security as culprits #1
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [6061]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Re: This loss had nothing to do with coaching.
Nov 26, 2022, 3:54 PM
|
|
The root cause of that just might be coaching....
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Beast [6579]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: This loss had nothing to do with coaching.
Nov 26, 2022, 3:58 PM
|
|
Defense gave up 31
|
|
|
|
 |
Offensive Star [349]
TigerPulse: 92%
15
|
Re: This loss had nothing to do with coaching.
Nov 26, 2022, 4:06 PM
|
|
Fourth and 1 and complete pass down to the one. Jeez Louise ?
|
|
|
|
 |
Offensive Star [349]
TigerPulse: 92%
15
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1637]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: This loss had nothing to do with coaching.
Nov 26, 2022, 4:50 PM
|
|
Defense got a interception on that drive so that had no affect on the game
|
|
|
|
 |
Offensive Star [349]
TigerPulse: 92%
15
|
|
|
|
 |
Solid Orange [1379]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
Re: This loss had nothing to do with coaching.
Nov 26, 2022, 4:48 PM
|
|
How many Louise’s you know?
|
|
|
|
 |
Standout [246]
TigerPulse: 63%
13
|
Re: This loss had nothing to do with coaching.
Nov 26, 2022, 4:45 PM
[ in reply to Re: This loss had nothing to do with coaching. ] |
|
Oh please the defense played their hearts out and most of the offen… there are three culprits here Dabo loving DJ and Streeter’s calls we’ve been saying it all year but nobody will hear us I’m sick of it …what a disgusting loss with the stadium full of fans…. Seriously you can be a fan but I’m telling you for what it cost to go to that stadium do a tailgate buy tickets and support what we’re looking at I’m done!
|
|
|
|
 |
Standout [219]
TigerPulse: 100%
13
|
|
|
|
 |
Freshman [-74]
TigerPulse: 66%
-1
|
Their QB executed. Ours did not.
Nov 26, 2022, 4:51 PM
|
|
Mix in 5 turnovers and that's the end of the story
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1637]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: This loss had nothing to do with coaching.
Nov 26, 2022, 4:49 PM
[ in reply to Re: This loss had nothing to do with coaching. ] |
|
Looked like some players started getting frustrated and probably gave up with no help from the offense
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [27824]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 48313
Joined: 2010
|
|
|
|
 |
Freshman [-74]
TigerPulse: 66%
-1
|
Nope. Concepts are fine.
Nov 26, 2022, 4:08 PM
|
|
27.6% is the root cause.
5 turnovers too.
Absolutely NOTHING to do with coaching or playcalling.
|
|
|
|
 |
Team Captain [465]
TigerPulse: 92%
18
|
Re: Nope. Concepts are fine.
Nov 26, 2022, 4:29 PM
|
|
You’re not correct. You don’t call a needless low percentage long pass play on 3rd and three. Run the ball! Lot’s of boneheaded calls.
|
|
|
|
 |
Freshman [-74]
TigerPulse: 66%
-1
|
Yes of course. Every play that doesn't work is a bad playcall.
Nov 26, 2022, 4:42 PM
|
|
Right?
There are plays that don't work and can be questioned in hindsight. Every team, every game.
When your QB executes at a 27.6% clip, there are no plays that can correct that. I saw numerous big plays left out there due to horrible accuracy. You will never see every play call "look" correct, at any level. Players make the difference.
I'm going to ask - if we had Rattler at QB today, then what do you think happens? Let's me honest here.
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1637]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Yes of course. Every play that doesn't work is a bad playcall.
Nov 26, 2022, 4:53 PM
|
|
If you continually call the same mess it is.. the run worked last year and this year.. the pass want there on either game but on the final three drives when the games on the line we slinging it like we got freakin Joe Burrow or something
|
|
|
|
 |
Freshman [-74]
TigerPulse: 66%
-1
|
So when it's 2nd and long or 3rd and long..
Nov 26, 2022, 5:02 PM
|
|
we should have run it? And then if we don't get 1st downs we should have thrown it? Right?
I saw several WRs open during the game. How many poorly thrown balls did you see today, and on those last 3 drives? When you're behind and its 2nd or 3rd and 7, then a pass is the correct call.
When you have the luxury of being ahead, then you can try to pound it. Not solely running the ball the last 3 drives is not why we lost.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2367]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Nope. Concepts are fine.
Nov 26, 2022, 4:47 PM
[ in reply to Nope. Concepts are fine. ] |
|
Cade has virtually no experience. Maybe he will be great, but he is not at the moment. The coaching staff has not brought him along, so it is tough to say that we should have just made a change. It's easy in hindsight, but he should have played more and more importantly, we should have used a more balanced offense when he was in. He has to become a better passer if he is to become our best option. Who would you say is responsible for developing Cade if it is not the coaching staff?
|
|
|
|
 |
Freshman [-74]
TigerPulse: 66%
-1
|
Yup.
Nov 26, 2022, 4:53 PM
|
|
But Cade is being developed just fine and not rushed.
Not every true freshman is Trevor Lawrence.
|
|
|
|
 |
Freshman [-74]
TigerPulse: 66%
-1
|
| |
|
|