|
Replies: 12
| visibility 1,110
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2/8/11
|
Las Vegas moving in Clemson's direction
Oct 3, 2015, 12:29 PM
|
|
-2 all the way to -3.
|
|
|
|
 |
Asst Coach [705]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 819
Joined: 2/1/10
|
Re: Las Vegas moving in Clemson's direction
Oct 3, 2015, 12:41 PM
|
|
DJ Reader playing?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24777]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42503
Joined: 7/31/10
|
No. Would be nice. They just saw Wilkins film....***
Oct 3, 2015, 12:42 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [36450]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18324
Joined: 12/6/13
|
Re: Las Vegas moving in Clemson's direction
Oct 3, 2015, 12:44 PM
|
|
I always find it humorous that these "experts" say what they do.
Vegas is always the true measure of a game prediction. They are not biased and just want to collect their %.
Like the Louisville game. ESPN said we should have killed the cards and we didn't play well... Vegas had it as a Pk game and then it moved to -3 Tigers only bc of betting. And we won by 3. So we actually did what was expected, but. ESPN thought we should have destroyed them, on the road, on a Thurs night...
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [580]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 1142
Joined: 1/31/15
|
Re: Las Vegas moving in Clemson's direction
Oct 3, 2015, 12:46 PM
|
|
They said -6.5 moron. Is that killing? #allin
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [36450]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18324
Joined: 12/6/13
|
it started as a Pickem game.
Oct 3, 2015, 12:57 PM
|
|
Which is the only true prediction. The rest of the movement is only based on betting moving the line. moron!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [990]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 1242
Joined: 10/3/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11252]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6675
Joined: 11/23/03
|
Re: Las Vegas moving in Clemson's direction
Oct 3, 2015, 12:48 PM
[ in reply to Re: Las Vegas moving in Clemson's direction ] |
|
Doesn't that then mean they are trying to get more bets on Clemson because more money is on domers?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24777]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42503
Joined: 7/31/10
|
Who cares? I'm VERY confident about our lines. Bet?***
Oct 3, 2015, 12:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11252]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6675
Joined: 11/23/03
|
Re: Naw, just axing
Oct 3, 2015, 12:55 PM
|
|
I quit betting in the seventies. MA diddy tole me, "Son, if you're betting, I hope you lose ". Consequently, I stopped betting on Clemson and started betting on usuc to win. PROFIT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [130]
TigerPulse: 93%
Posts: 272
Joined: 1/4/12
|
Re: Las Vegas moving in Clemson's direction
Oct 3, 2015, 12:52 PM
[ in reply to Re: Las Vegas moving in Clemson's direction ] |
|
No... Clemson has to win by more to cover the bet. So less people would bet on Clemson. It went from -2 to -3... So Clemson has to win by more than 3 points to cover. Where before it was they had to win by more than 2 points... Understand??
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11252]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6675
Joined: 11/23/03
|
Re: Yes
Oct 3, 2015, 1:04 PM
|
|
No, not really. Thanks for the info.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [130]
TigerPulse: 93%
Posts: 272
Joined: 1/4/12
|
Re: Las Vegas moving in Clemson's direction
Oct 3, 2015, 12:54 PM
|
|
-2 to -3 is a big move.. Must have a lot of later bets on Clemson... I saw that online bets were 56% in favor of Clemson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 12
| visibility 1,110
|
|
|
50
