Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
Simultaneous reception just occured Dallas vs Jets
Other Sports Boards - The Pro Zone
add New Topic
Replies: 9
| visibility 1

Simultaneous reception just occured Dallas vs Jets


Sep 11, 2011, 10:22 PM
Reply

still remember that BC game. I thought that rule was and still is total bunk. If you have simultaneous reception it should be treated as an incomplete pass AT WORST. In no way do you award a player for a play he did not make

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


my first thought as well!***


Sep 11, 2011, 10:23 PM
Reply



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Well I don't know. He did make a play it's just that


Sep 11, 2011, 10:25 PM
Reply

someone else did too. The intended receiver did catch the ball. So, how do you call it incomplete just because the defender puts his hands on it to. Somewhat unrelated, but I hate the jumpball rule in basketball.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Very, Very Excited. Very, Very Proud.


Re: Well I don't know. He did make a play it's just that


Sep 11, 2011, 10:29 PM
Reply

He didn't technically make the play. Neither cornerback or wide receiver made the play. You can't award something to one and not the other. If you cannot do that then the only option available is incomplete pass....game on

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


The rule makes sense


Sep 11, 2011, 10:28 PM
Reply

And I'm no Cowboy fan, but as applied there it makes good sense. The receiver caught the ball. The defender did not cause an incomplete pass, and thus it was correctly applied.

The BC game was a different case altogether. Our player clearly had possession and theirs just had their hands on the ball. THAT was a horrible call.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: The rule makes sense


Sep 11, 2011, 10:30 PM
Reply

maybe i am just torn on that rule because it was incorrectly applied our game vs. BC

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Perhaps


Sep 11, 2011, 10:38 PM
Reply

The ruling in the BC game was absolutely incorrect as the receiver never actually had possession.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Brooking has been in the NFL 14 years at LB


Sep 11, 2011, 10:31 PM
Reply

wow

badge-donor-05yr.jpgringofhonor-74tiger.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Brooking has been in the NFL 14 years at LB


Sep 11, 2011, 10:50 PM
Reply

Yep....and he isn't even that great. Its like some people have lifetime passes in the NFL Tavaris Jackson, Brookings, Roy Williams, and many others.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


It's the "jump ball" of football and it is what it is,


Sep 11, 2011, 10:57 PM
Reply

there's just no possession arrow, so yeah, it's a stupid rule...

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

A Tiger man needs no introduction...


Replies: 9
| visibility 1
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Hill Watch...98 days!!!(14 weeks!)

by O.J.

Other Sports Boards - The Pro Zone
add New Topic