Replies: 19
| visibility 2474
|
Hall of Famer [8930]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 11812
Joined: 2011
|
14 $EC Teams in the Tournament is BS
6
6
Mar 16, 2025, 6:52 PM
|
|
Total and utterly BS!
8 would have been more than enough. I hope many (or all) of the $EC Teams lose early.
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [8930]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 11812
Joined: 2011
|
Re: 14 $EC Teams in the Tournament is BS
2
Mar 16, 2025, 6:55 PM
|
|
Pundits picking Yale over TA&M And Drake over Missouri I want Robert Morris to beat Bama and Wofford to beat Tennessee.
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1914]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: 14 $EC Teams in the Tournament is BS
1
Mar 16, 2025, 6:57 PM
|
|
It will be pure joy watching all these sec teams lose in the early rounds.
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [2037]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: I was all for Drake until I saw they got matched up with Mizzou
Mar 17, 2025, 8:53 AM
[ in reply to Re: 14 $EC Teams in the Tournament is BS ] |
|
I know Drake is good defensively but Missouri can be very, very good at times. if they come with their 'A' game then Drake has no shot.
On Yale/A&M, the Aggies have been falling off lately and given yale's upset last year...it'll be a trendy pick. I just feel like its a dangling carrot to choose this upset but Buzz Williams will pull it out.
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Day Hero [4224]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: 14 $EC Teams in the Tournament is BS
1
Mar 16, 2025, 6:58 PM
|
|
Not surprised at all...we knew this was coming.
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [6953]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
Posts: 13902
Joined: 2000
|
The only reason I have a problem with it is because in the past when the ACC
1
Mar 16, 2025, 7:16 PM
|
|
was very strong, the ACC did not get near that many even though they deserved more. The SEC is a good conference this year, but the bias is ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
 |
Head Coach [931]
TigerPulse: 43%
24
|
Re: 14 $EC Teams in the Tournament is BS
2
Mar 16, 2025, 7:46 PM
|
|
Just say you don't follow CBB and leave it at that.....8 teams, really?
Texas, I will give you, but the others were not even borderline. The SEC dominated all season, was by far the best, and deserved every bid except maybe 1.
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [8331]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: 14 $EC Teams in the Tournament is BS
2
Mar 17, 2025, 1:20 AM
|
|
A conference cannot “dominate all season”. It can have a good November and December. That’s all.
|
|
|
|
 |
Head Coach [906]
TigerPulse: 71%
24
|
Re: 14 $EC Teams in the Tournament is BS
2
Mar 16, 2025, 7:47 PM
|
|
The ACC was 4-30 against the SEC so we have no argument against them getting all those teams in .
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [5878]
TigerPulse: 96%
39
|
Its not an ACC vs SEC argument***
1
Mar 17, 2025, 7:11 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Commissioner [1271]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: 14 $EC Teams in the Tournament is BS
Mar 16, 2025, 7:50 PM
|
|
How so? Those teams are legit.
|
|
|
|
 |
Head Coach [931]
TigerPulse: 43%
24
|
Re: 14 $EC Teams in the Tournament is BS
Mar 16, 2025, 7:54 PM
|
|
I will, however, take an upset of an SEC #2 seed this week in Lexington. I would like it but I don't think we have a chance against UT.
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [8331]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: 14 $EC Teams in the Tournament is BS
1
Mar 17, 2025, 1:20 AM
[ in reply to Re: 14 $EC Teams in the Tournament is BS ] |
|
How so? Those teams are legit.
That’s what they said last year. Then almost all of them tanked in the tourney.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Pro [740]
TigerPulse: 95%
22
|
Re: 14 $EC Teams in the Tournament is BS
Mar 16, 2025, 8:32 PM
|
|
My selection bracket has six advancing to the second round.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Pro [791]
TigerPulse: 65%
22
|
Re: 14 $EC Teams in the Tournament is BS
1
Mar 16, 2025, 8:32 PM
|
|
Total and utterly BS!
8 would have been more than enough. I hope many (or all) of the $EC Teams lose early.
They must have went by the SEC/ACC Challenge how the SEC slapped the ACC's faces all over the court.
|
|
|
|
 |
Valley Legend [12594]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
Posts: 10328
Joined: 2006
|
Re: 14 $EC Teams in the Tournament is BS
Mar 17, 2025, 12:37 AM
|
|
Yeah, they must have "went" by that
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [5878]
TigerPulse: 96%
39
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [142]
TigerPulse: 80%
11
|
Re: Again, when UT accomplishes something let us know.***
Mar 17, 2025, 8:40 AM
|
|
By what standard do you regard “accomplishments”? By my count, they also went to an EE last year in MBB, they have 8 nattys in WBB, 6 nattys in FB, won a natty last year in baseball, one year after embarrassing us at our own regional. We got 3 nattys in FB and we have soccer. Not to be that guy, but dude- open your eyes 🤷♂️
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [18160]
TigerPulse: 94%
52
Posts: 28096
Joined: 2003
|
Getting in with a 6-12 conference record is absolutely ridiculous...You lost
Mar 17, 2025, 12:50 AM
|
|
two thirds of your conference games...I don't give a #### how tough they said it was
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2516]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: 14 $EC Teams in the Tournament is BS
Mar 17, 2025, 1:20 AM
|
|
With losing conference records. Remember when that meant something?
|
|
|
|
Replies: 19
| visibility 2474
|
|
|