Replies: 16
| visibility 102
|
Orange Elite [5497]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
California can't travel to many ACC locations
5
5
Sep 1, 2023, 10:08 AM
|
|
California state agencies--including universities--are not permitted to travel to states that California politically disagrees with.
PROHIBITION ON STATE-FUNDED AND STATE-SPONSORED TRAVEL TO STATES WITH DISCRIMINATORY LAWS (ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 1887)
The travel prohibition applies to state agencies, departments, boards, authorities, and commissions, including an agency, department, board, authority, or commission of the University of California, the Board of Regents of the University of California, and the California State University. (Gov. Code, § 11139.8, subd. (b).)
States Subject to AB 1887’s Travel Prohibition The following states are currently subject to California’s ban on state-funded and state-sponsored travel:
Alabama Arizona Arkansas Florida Georgia Idaho Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Mississippi Montana North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah West Virginia Wyoming
Exceptions The Legislature created exceptions in AB 1887 that allow travel to banned states in certain circumstances. (Gov. Code, § 11139.8, subd. (c).) These exceptions only apply if travel to a subject state is "required." (Ibid.)
Specifically, AB 1887 does not apply to state travel that is required for any of the following purposes:
Enforcement of California law, including auditing and revenue collection. Litigation. To meet contractual obligations incurred before January 1, 2017. To comply with requests by the federal government to appear before committees. To participate in meetings or training required by a grant or required to maintain grant funding. To complete job-required training necessary to maintain licensure or similar standards required for holding a position, in the event that comparable training cannot be obtained in California or a different state not subject to the travel prohibition. For the protection of public health, welfare, or safety, as determined by the affected agency, department, board, authority, or commission, or by the affected legislative office. (Gov. Code, § 11139.8, subd. (c).)
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1570]
TigerPulse: 100%
30
|
Re: California can't travel to many ACC locations
Sep 1, 2023, 10:10 AM
|
|
it can't be that big of a deal because they are playing @Utah this year
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [32927]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 18464
Joined: 2008
|
Re: California can't travel to many ACC locations
1
Sep 1, 2023, 10:10 AM
|
|
I'm sure Jim Phillips was aware of this when he begged Calford to join the ACC.......
not.
|
|
|
|
 |
Solid Orange [1391]
TigerPulse: 93%
28
|
He was probably a little more educated and understands
Sep 1, 2023, 10:28 AM
|
|
that the issue is moot, as Cal Berkeley already plays annually at states on that list.
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [3056]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: He was probably a little more educated and understands
Sep 1, 2023, 11:44 AM
|
|
I think he has a Stanford degree. Imagine that
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [5619]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Re: California can't travel to many ACC locations
3
Sep 1, 2023, 10:11 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [40343]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 22719
Joined: 2003
|
When Jim Phillips Burps It Smells Like CAL's Anusz***
1
Sep 1, 2023, 10:12 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [8213]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 16083
Joined: 2001
|
they just make laws, they don't actaully follow them
1
Sep 1, 2023, 10:18 AM
|
|
they then sue for not following, and send a check to the plantiff
|
|
|
|
 |
Solid Orange [1391]
TigerPulse: 93%
28
|
Re: California can't travel to many ACC locations
Sep 1, 2023, 10:26 AM
|
|
Cal already plays annually in sports at Arizona and Utah, so there goes the theory of this being an issue.
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [24894]
TigerPulse: 94%
54
Posts: 17252
Joined: 2002
|
Just like California to virtue signal LOL
1
Sep 1, 2023, 10:50 AM
|
|
.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Elite [5497]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: California can't travel to many ACC locations
1
Sep 1, 2023, 11:28 AM
[ in reply to Re: California can't travel to many ACC locations ] |
|
Exception: "To meet contractual obligations incurred before January 1, 2017."
They're playing conference games according to conference contracts set long ago.
New ACC contract would not meet this requirement.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1283]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Its just nutty
1
Sep 1, 2023, 10:59 AM
|
|
This sort of thing is why I couldn’t stay in California. I lived south of San Francisco for winters for 4 years 2010-2014. Every day I would read the San Fran papers and be engulfed with disbelief and disgust for the diktats and antics of California politicians in general and SF in particular. I would look at the Californians around me and wonder how they could endorse such garbage. And they felt so enlightened and superior to the rest of the country that they didnt know much about. Any time I hear about California’s social problems with the homeless and petty criminality, I think “that’s what you voted for.”
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Day Hero [4450]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Its all about virtue signaling
1
1
Sep 1, 2023, 11:03 AM
|
|
No rational person would otherwise continue to vote in the people who have destroyed their urban areas with idiotic policies and lack of law enforcement
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7763]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
Posts: 16315
Joined: 2002
|
I hadn't thought about that, but it's technically true.***
Sep 1, 2023, 11:05 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [44717]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 11702
Joined: 2015
|
Re: California can't travel to many ACC locations
Sep 2, 2023, 7:58 AM
|
|
Like everything about California they say one thing but do the opposite. Voters voted that current regime so they probably have not a clue. Parts of that state have become drug infested homeless camps. Think they are a sanctuary state or has cities that claim to be a sanctuary state but raise hell when you bus migrants there.
Not sure why or how they feel Texas should have carried the torch on figuring out this mess the current administration fails to act on.
|
|
|
|
 |
Associate AD [1019]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
Re: California can't travel to many ACC locations
1
Sep 2, 2023, 7:59 AM
|
|
I’m proud to see South Carolina on this list.
|
|
|
|
 |
Walk-On [113]
TigerPulse: 100%
11
|
Re: California can't travel to many ACC locations
Sep 2, 2023, 8:23 AM
|
|
AB 1887 only impacts state funded and state sponsored travel, it doesn’t affect travel paid for or reimbursed using non-state funds. Since neither Stanford or Cal use state monies to pay for athletic travel it seems like a non-issue to me but what do I know ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
|
|
|
Replies: 16
| visibility 102
|
|
|