|
Replies: 40
| visibility 4090
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 48607
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently?
3
Sep 9, 2025, 7:00 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Asst Coach [800]
TigerPulse: 100%
23
|
Re: TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently?
1
3
Sep 9, 2025, 7:12 AM
|
|
Any comments from Matt Luke yet? I thought in his second year the OL was going to take off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12446]
TigerPulse: 75%
47
Posts: 12436
Joined: 2017
|
Re: TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently?
2
Sep 9, 2025, 7:15 AM
|
|
Yeah. He said the next 10+ games will be exactly like the first 2 games.
Since that’s the way simple minded fans think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [54053]
TigerPulse: 79%
59
Posts: 38717
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2913]
TigerPulse: 99%
33
|
At least you are consistent. Another stupid poast.***
1
1
Sep 9, 2025, 8:40 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8505]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 16362
Joined: 2001
|
He is accurate on this. Dabo made that change before
2
Sep 9, 2025, 10:05 AM
|
|
last season or the year before. He limits in season access to the assistants. The coordinators have certain dates to speak, that’s it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [42678]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 15771
Joined: 2014
|
Re: He is accurate on this. Dabo made that change before
1
Sep 9, 2025, 10:13 AM
|
|
Yep. Another adjustment by Dabo to be more like most of the other programs in the nation. Like using the portal and NIL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2913]
TigerPulse: 99%
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [431]
TigerPulse: 56%
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [28419]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16782
Joined: 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7898]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [30994]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 21440
Joined: 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [42678]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 15771
Joined: 2014
|
Re: TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently?
9
9
Sep 9, 2025, 8:02 AM
|
|
Hard to argue with anything here. We are a lot better on paper than we have played so far. Really hope that translates to the field soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9408]
TigerPulse: 98%
44
|
"We are a lot better on paper than we have played so far."
12
12
Sep 9, 2025, 8:12 AM
|
|
Been saying that for 5 years now.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5553]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently?
3
Sep 9, 2025, 8:30 AM
|
|
Well for 5 years now it's got us 9+ wins. I'd say that's good enough on paper. But once you dissect it and look under the microscope...well, here we are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12192]
TigerPulse: 64%
47
Posts: 15204
Joined: 2006
|
Re: TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently?
2
Sep 9, 2025, 8:52 AM
|
|
It depends on whether we start playing up to our potential and who we play. We probably have more NFL draft picks on this team than any team lately and maybe a record number so absolutely we should consistently win this year. Football is a year to year product because of the comings and goings of the Portal so to even think about future years is simply a waste of time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19115]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 11151
Joined: 2008
|
Re: TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently?
3
Sep 9, 2025, 9:11 AM
|
|
Most of those draft picks are on defense. Our main one on offense hasn't done anything to help his case, either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7898]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently?
1
Sep 9, 2025, 9:22 AM
|
|
Unless he drastically improves, he’ll go from a 1st round pick to a 2nd or 3rd. I hope he turns things around at GT.
Message was edited by: Stillapirate®
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [81]
TigerPulse: 99%
9
|
Re: TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently?
2
Sep 9, 2025, 10:11 AM
|
|
Likely a late round based on the poor decisions and inability to read a defense. NFL coaches aren’t going to invest in a QB without good instincts
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6545]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently?
2
Sep 9, 2025, 9:37 AM
|
|
The talent is....the coaching isn't. Mainly the OC and position coaches on offense
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12775]
TigerPulse: 89%
47
Posts: 15206
Joined: 2004
|
in this conference?....YES............Outside the conference?.....not so much.
2
Sep 9, 2025, 9:38 AM
|
|
as the numbers/trends have shown the last 4+ years
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [424]
TigerPulse: 80%
17
|
Re: TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently?
2
Sep 9, 2025, 9:39 AM
|
|
Answer= NO
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [933]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Re: TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently?
2
Sep 9, 2025, 9:40 AM
|
|
The obvious answer is NO! The bigger question is why is our coaching staff(from the top down) having such a tough time maximizing our football potential? Where is the proper instruction? Where is the aggressiveness on both sides of the ball? Is it possible that our staff does too much "hand holding" instead of implenting "tough love" when needed? Time is running short- Ga. Tech does not play patty-cake football.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [993]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Re: TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently?
1
Sep 9, 2025, 9:54 AM
|
|
I hope not either. Maybe we should have done what Syracuse’s coach did and make the team run sprints after winning the Troy game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1732]
TigerPulse: 61%
31
|
Re: TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently?
1
Sep 9, 2025, 12:57 PM
|
|
dabo was busy dancing in locker room with players after a huge win over Troy!!! lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [933]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Re: TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently?***
Sep 9, 2025, 9:42 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [289]
TigerPulse: 97%
14
|
Re: TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently?***
Sep 9, 2025, 12:13 PM
|
|
No it isn't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14959]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 24052
Joined: 2004
|
GT is physical under Key
3
Sep 9, 2025, 9:44 AM
|
|
Given what I've seen from this Clemson team, GT is probably going to win in the trenches on both sides of the ball. Can we overcome that? I dunno.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [289]
TigerPulse: 97%
14
|
Re: GT is physical under Key
Sep 9, 2025, 12:14 PM
|
|
No. Sorry, it's just no.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [933]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Re: TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently?
1
Sep 9, 2025, 9:50 AM
|
|
We can set things right Saturday. If we do not, to say that it is going to be a long year will be the "understatement" for all time. Here we go!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [319]
TigerPulse: 100%
15
|
Re: TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently?
3
Sep 9, 2025, 9:54 AM
|
|
The team I saw on tge field for the 1st half against Troy looked like they wanted to be anywhere other than on tge field.
Football is such an emotional game and this team looks like they have been reading how GREAT they are and not taking the ROY BUS attitude on tge field.
Fortunately it can be turned around in a short period of time, so let’s all hope they get their HEADS OUT OF THEIR REAR ENDS and start playing!!!!
100% Coach related . The coaches need to kick some bytt and it looked in the 2nd half they did.
Let’s hope it continues…. GO TIGERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [993]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Re: TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently?
2
Sep 9, 2025, 10:00 AM
|
|
Yes lets’ hope so. We will see on Saturday. I hope their has been some attitude adjustments will be made this week at practice. I love our players and our coaches work hard. They all want to win. But sometimes reading about how good you are and believing that you can just go out and perform on what’s been said about how good you are is a very different thing. You still have to work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Playmaker [358]
TigerPulse: 100%
16
|
Re: TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently?
2
Sep 9, 2025, 10:20 AM
|
|
I hope that they come out fired up, but I question this staff "kicking their butts". Instead of running sprints after a terrible performance, they were dancing in the locker room like they had won a natty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [506]
TigerPulse: 100%
19
|
Re: TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently?
Sep 9, 2025, 10:40 AM
[ in reply to Re: TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently? ] |
|
Hope in one hand and sh*t in the other and see which fills up faster! Hope is not a plan!!!!!!!!! If we continue to do what we have always done, we will continue to get what we always got..........
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1286]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently?
1
Sep 9, 2025, 10:41 AM
|
|
No, not really…..but….. we can talk about Cade all we want, but until that O line actually grows a pair this is pretty much what our O is gonna look like. Dude has 0 time in the pocket and they. Ant consistently run block for the backs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11186]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 12188
Joined: 2003
|
Its bad enough to lose consistently in big games!***
Sep 9, 2025, 11:44 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11186]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 12188
Joined: 2003
|
Its bad enough to lose consistently in big games!***
Sep 9, 2025, 11:44 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [109432]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 27125
Joined: 2006
|
It can win some games but not consistently against elite talent.***
3
Sep 9, 2025, 12:14 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19117]
TigerPulse: 95%
52
Posts: 28831
Joined: 2003
|
Yes, we'll be fine playing most of the ACC teams on our schedule, it's teams
2
Sep 9, 2025, 3:50 PM
|
|
with a pulse that we struggle with
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [106]
TigerPulse: 73%
11
|
Re: TNET: Is Clemson's current product good enough to win consistently?
2
Sep 9, 2025, 3:47 PM
|
|
If you get a chance to watch the video from Eric McLean it explains a lot. He breaks down all of the good the bad and the ugly and it’s very eye-opening. You can watch the video and that’ll make all the comments for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [692]
TigerPulse: 97%
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 40
| visibility 4090
|
|
|
50
