Replies: 36
| visibility 254
|
Rooter [205]
TigerPulse: 26%
13
|
This is complete sarcasm (and will probably get deleted) but
Dec 2, 2012, 2:12 PM
|
|
88-75, we still own you in basketball. 150 years of dominance!
See how stupid that makes me look?
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [29916]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 34830
Joined: 2009
|
you havent won a tournament game since 1967***
Dec 2, 2012, 2:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [19070]
TigerPulse: 95%
52
Posts: 17619
Joined: 2004
|
won 7 of 9 in hoops. That is something.
Dec 2, 2012, 3:02 PM
|
|
Pretty much owned them the last 9 years.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Immortal [66649]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 24686
Joined: 2011
|
|
|
|
 |
Heisman Winner [78262]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 120116
Joined: 1998
|
Re: not as stupid
Dec 2, 2012, 2:14 PM
|
|
as your logo
|
|
|
|
 |
Heisman Winner [79592]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 20607
Joined: 2008
|
And not as stupid as their football coach always
Dec 2, 2012, 2:58 PM
|
|
appears in any public forum.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2336]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
I don't think basketball is 150 years old. You're right,
Dec 2, 2012, 2:14 PM
|
|
that post did make you look stupid.
|
|
|
|
 |
Rooter [205]
TigerPulse: 26%
13
|
Good pick up, you know what I mean though lol***
Dec 2, 2012, 2:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Head Coach [972]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Re: Good pick up, you know what I mean though lol***
Dec 2, 2012, 2:22 PM
|
|
Yeah, you have dominated us in basketball over the years and have a good basketball history. It is MUCH better than your football history. Don't ever for a second minimize the accomplishments of the program you support. Just because the game happened a long time ago doesn't make the blood, sweat, and tears that went into obtaining those rivalry victories less significant.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2372]
TigerPulse: 97%
32
|
Re: They only have a 54% winning percentage on us in men's
Dec 2, 2012, 3:23 PM
|
|
basketball. I assume that was mainly home-and-home, although I can't be sure. Anyway, it hardly seems dominating to me. Hopefully we can keep playing well here.
Regarding football, we have a 62% winning percentage (neglecting the 4 ties), having won at a fairly consistent rate even before home-and-home competition began in 1959. Hopefully we can do a little better here and get on another streak of our own.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2078]
TigerPulse: 96%
31
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [30793]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 62760
Joined: 1999
|
You don't need that to make you look
Dec 2, 2012, 2:14 PM
|
|
stupid.
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [9771]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
Posts: 13655
Joined: 1998
|
don't worry
Dec 2, 2012, 2:15 PM
|
|
you don't just look stupid
|
|
|
|
 |
Junkie [588]
TigerPulse: 74%
20
|
no your jusy a dumb ### peroid***
Dec 2, 2012, 2:15 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Rooter [205]
TigerPulse: 26%
13
|
Do you misspell on purpose?***
Dec 2, 2012, 2:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Elite [5570]
TigerPulse: 73%
38
Posts: 19639
Joined: 2009
|
loser coot...just like ur coach and refs today***
Dec 2, 2012, 2:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Dynasty Maker [3393]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Ok, I'll bite. "Hey the past doesn't matter. We are the
Dec 2, 2012, 2:16 PM
|
|
present day winners. But thanks for the history lesson". Go Tigers...today's winner! Tough S### smart ####!
|
|
|
|
 |
Tiger Spirit [9870]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
Posts: 11156
Joined: 2003
|
Being a Coot is what makes you look stupid!***
Dec 2, 2012, 2:18 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1674]
TigerPulse: 93%
31
|
I don't get it. What you are saying is that Clemson
Dec 2, 2012, 2:18 PM
|
|
boasting about it's series dominance over USC in football makes Clemson fans look stupid. So, how does USC bragging about beating Clemson four years straight make USC fans look? Smart? Stupid?
|
|
|
|
 |
Rooter [205]
TigerPulse: 26%
13
|
I see Clemson quoting the overall record as a coping
Dec 2, 2012, 2:20 PM
|
|
mechanism for what's currently happening.
Personally if you care more about games even 5 years ago compared to this year, more power to you.
I was implying those games really don't matter, other than the current one.
And yes, I'm guilty of saying "4 in a row" because the streak is nice, but honestly it's all about the most recent game.
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [229]
TigerPulse: 99%
13
|
Re: I see Clemson quoting the overall record as a coping
Dec 2, 2012, 3:32 PM
|
|
And I see you chanting SEC because it's the only thing that gives Coots any credibility. And that's not much.
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Day Hero [4368]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Being stupid...
Dec 2, 2012, 2:19 PM
|
|
Makes you look stupid
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Day Hero [4477]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: This is complete sarcasm (and will probably get deleted) but
Dec 2, 2012, 2:20 PM
|
|
It's not what you say that makes you appear stupid. It's your user icon!!! Duh!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [11435]
TigerPulse: 84%
46
Posts: 14500
Joined: 2011
|
No we own you in football and basketball
Dec 2, 2012, 2:24 PM
|
|
Before your little 2 game streak we had won like 11 of 14 also before your 4 game streak well you know. Also if you wanna bring up the last 3 before this year, you have to bring up the rest, FACT
|
|
|
|
 |
Rooter [205]
TigerPulse: 26%
13
|
I'm confused though, you can't have it both ways
Dec 2, 2012, 2:35 PM
|
|
Either you own us because you own the overall series, or you own us because you've won the last game, can't be both though. And spare me the last 20 years of basketball games, I'm looking at the entire record.
So which is it? Football because you have the overall record, or basketball because you've won the most recent game?
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [11435]
TigerPulse: 84%
46
Posts: 14500
Joined: 2011
|
Fine we own you in football and baseball***
Dec 2, 2012, 4:34 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [22966]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 25003
Joined: 1999
|
If you'll look at the record for the last 35 years or more
Dec 2, 2012, 2:23 PM
|
|
you idiots maintain that slim lead ONLY because the teams quit playing twice per year. Clemson has dominated in basketball for a long while But to imply the record means "nothing" is just stupidity on your part
|
|
|
|
 |
Commissioner [944]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Re: This is complete sarcasm (and will probably get deleted) but
Dec 2, 2012, 2:27 PM
|
|
God made you look stupid!
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [27753]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 32032
Joined: 2003
|
Re: This is complete sarcasm (and will probably get deleted) but
Dec 2, 2012, 2:31 PM
|
|
Coach McGuire was a heck of a coach ... and never cheated!, I have a good friend here where I live who played in those early years and you wouldn't want to hear what was allowed back then. Makes the recent hotel scandal seem mild in comparison. Your best concern should be what is going to happen to '####' sports in the future. Tigers reign supreme always!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2372]
TigerPulse: 97%
32
|
Re: Is it true McGuire carried a purse?***
Dec 2, 2012, 2:48 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Junkie [588]
TigerPulse: 74%
20
|
funny how coots can run amuck on this board
Dec 2, 2012, 2:50 PM
|
|
But post can be deleted if you bust their ##### in a thread....
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Day Hero [4369]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
That statement doesn't make you looks stupid ...
Dec 2, 2012, 2:55 PM
|
|
but coming to this site makes you pathetic!
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2278]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Yep...makes you look tupid...can't really add anything....
Dec 2, 2012, 2:56 PM
|
|
...(just funning with you)..
|
|
|
|
 |
Junkie [588]
TigerPulse: 74%
20
|
im not always the worlds biggest dumb ###
Dec 2, 2012, 3:01 PM
|
|
But when I am...I make sure I have on my usuck Jr shirt.......stay classless my feathered friends.
|
|
|
|
 |
Devotee [304]
TigerPulse: 100%
15
|
Re: This is complete sarcasm (and will probably get deleted) but
Dec 2, 2012, 3:43 PM
|
|
Now just think how stupid it would have been for Clemson fans to chant ACC after the win today.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [3258]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
We probably shoud have.***
Dec 2, 2012, 4:34 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [3258]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
You are absolutely correct. Like we own football/baseball!
Dec 2, 2012, 3:48 PM
|
|
Check it out facts are facts.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 36
| visibility 254
|
|
|