Replies: 44
| visibility 5
|
110%er [5436]
TigerPulse: 70%
Posts: 9310
Joined: 11/29/99
|
Drop the Cupcakes...who'd you rather play?
Jul 6, 2012, 9:35 PM
|
|
While I understand the 'tune up' game to start the season was the original thought to playing FCS schools, now it's gone to "Kick-Off Classics" and it's a big game to start the season. I would rather play a 12 game schedule against solid opponents for everyone. The new playoff system should get this to the forefront of scheduling as strength of schedule will be more valued.
I like to keep the games with Auburn & USC is a given, but what about the 2 other games we could schedule?
My choices would be: GEORGIA, WEST VIRGINIA or PENN STATE. (I can already hear the WVU jokes coming.)
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4114]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 5239
Joined: 10/23/10
|
You could throw Alabama in the list also....
Jul 6, 2012, 9:41 PM
|
|
You have a fine list.... Alabama would make a good choice also... relatively close, good program, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3257]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7167
Joined: 7/27/99
|
what about packers and saints! you have to have gimmies.***
Jul 6, 2012, 9:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5436]
TigerPulse: 70%
Posts: 9310
Joined: 11/29/99
|
We do...Duke & Wake and every other conference has doormats
Jul 6, 2012, 10:22 PM
|
|
When all the conferences go to 16 teams in the next few years, there will several FBS schools that get 'demoted' to FCS.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11435]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 14500
Joined: 1/2/11
|
yeah Wake was one missed FG from winning atlantic
Jul 6, 2012, 11:27 PM
|
|
Real door mat
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4114]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 5239
Joined: 10/23/10
|
|
|
|
|
Rooter [205]
TigerPulse: 26%
Posts: 426
Joined: 3/5/12
|
You mean the team that got thumped at home by a team
Jul 8, 2012, 2:23 PM
|
|
who finished 2-6 in the SEC? Please enlighten me on how good the ACC is again.
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22965]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 25005
Joined: 6/24/99
|
add this chickentroll to the list and ignore this post***
Jul 8, 2012, 2:25 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooter [205]
TigerPulse: 26%
Posts: 426
Joined: 3/5/12
|
I'm already on the list, and I wasn't aware "trolling" meant
Jul 8, 2012, 2:28 PM
|
|
asking about the truth. Sensitive much?
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22965]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 25005
Joined: 6/24/99
|
Re: I'm already on the list, and I wasn't aware "trolling" meant
Jul 8, 2012, 2:29 PM
|
|
making inflammatory statements qualifies you as just another stupid chickentroll
moronic much??
|
|
|
|
|
Rooter [205]
TigerPulse: 26%
Posts: 426
Joined: 3/5/12
|
So you don't want to be told your conference is terrible,
Jul 8, 2012, 2:32 PM
|
|
sorry I'm the one to open your eyes. Slide those orange blinders back over your eyes and ignore me, how dare I speak ill of the ACC or Clemson.
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22965]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 25005
Joined: 6/24/99
|
Re: So you don't want to be told your conference is terrible,
Jul 8, 2012, 2:35 PM
|
|
Your opinion on Tigernet is unwanted, unasked for, unnecessary and irrelevant.
Being just another slimy chickentroll, you add nothing to the conversation. Drag your feathered ### back to fgf where someone might give an "eff" what you say or think.
|
|
|
|
|
Rooter [205]
TigerPulse: 26%
Posts: 426
Joined: 3/5/12
|
Seeing you get up in arms about a fact is much more fun
Jul 8, 2012, 2:39 PM
|
|
I think I found my follower. Seeing that you are either 35 or 36 years old (assuming you were born in 76) I would think you'd have better things to do than thumbs down every single one of my posts, but whatever makes you happy.
Also, I did add something to the conversation. How many times have fans over here called it the "SEC Least", yet when I pose a question on how one of the almost "top" teams in the ACC gets throttled by one of those lowly teams, it's irrelevant?
But, like I said, stay in this Clemson bubble of a website, where anything negative about Clemson or the ACC is complete rubbish. I thought you were going to ignore me anyhow.
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [802]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 1234
Joined: 8/12/11
|
Actually that is me TDing every one of your posts.
Jul 8, 2012, 2:42 PM
|
|
get lost. I don't go to FGF to hear stupidity, nor does he. So go back to your friends.
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [802]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 1234
Joined: 8/12/11
|
|
|
|
|
Rooter [205]
TigerPulse: 26%
Posts: 426
Joined: 3/5/12
|
Lol... oooo I'm so angry I thumbs downed you!
Jul 8, 2012, 2:59 PM
|
|
it's cute you double posted considering I actually, partially listened to what you said (I don't go to FGF either). I'll have to keep posting to keep your world spinning.
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [802]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 1234
Joined: 8/12/11
|
what ever makes you happy dumb ###.***
Jul 8, 2012, 3:00 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [32]
TigerPulse: 39%
Posts: 54
Joined: 5/9/12
|
Re: Drop the Cupcakes...who'd you rather play?
Jul 6, 2012, 9:59 PM
|
|
Texas A&M quality opponent and they seem to do things the right way. Similar to Clemson—good fans and family values
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5436]
TigerPulse: 70%
Posts: 9310
Joined: 11/29/99
|
I thought about Tex-AM..could help with recruiting out there***
Jul 6, 2012, 10:18 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10793]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11745
Joined: 6/29/01
|
Look, I'm for playing a tough out of conference game or two,
Jul 6, 2012, 10:11 PM
|
|
but there's just no sense in scheduling like that. Unless of course say FSU and Ga. Tech were to leave the conference...then we may have no choice.
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [381]
TigerPulse: 77%
Posts: 376
Joined: 9/10/11
|
Re: Look, I'm for playing a tough out of conference game or two,
Jul 6, 2012, 11:46 PM
|
|
Funny how some people complain about being in a weak, basketball driven acc, yet the second someone says let's schedule some quality ooc games, they cry about it being too hard. Seriously, you cant have it both ways. I say load out up. Play the best. Leave no doubt!
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [32]
TigerPulse: 39%
Posts: 54
Joined: 5/9/12
|
Nicely put — either you want a better schedule or you don’t***
Jul 7, 2012, 12:40 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4114]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 5239
Joined: 10/23/10
|
Lets Play Notre Dame!!!***
Jul 6, 2012, 10:11 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11435]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 14500
Joined: 1/2/11
|
yeah lets make the path almost impossible
Jul 6, 2012, 11:25 PM
|
|
While everyone else plays a couple cup cakes.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5436]
TigerPulse: 70%
Posts: 9310
Joined: 11/29/99
|
Try thinking a little....EVERY team would be doing the same
Jul 7, 2012, 1:40 AM
|
|
thing in all the conferences. Starting to win against better competition is the ONLY thing to give the ACC any credibility in the new playoff system.
Stop hiding behind your mamma's skirt and come out and play with the big boys...
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16557]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12872
Joined: 11/14/09
|
There's a bigger contingent of fans than you think that
Jul 7, 2012, 12:04 AM
|
|
would rather keep the schedule lighter versus toughen it up. The idea that tougher competition makes a strong team stronger is completely lost on many. A decade of ACC mediocrity based on spreading the competition out is strangling every team in the league, and it's about to get worse.
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16557]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12872
Joined: 11/14/09
|
Though loading up with what you're suggesting would be a
Jul 7, 2012, 12:05 AM
|
|
little overboard.
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [108392]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 64974
Joined: 2/25/06
|
where? where are these people of which you speak?
Jul 7, 2012, 12:11 AM
[ in reply to There's a bigger contingent of fans than you think that ] |
|
is this another feign to your idea of ####### half the league so cu can have a seventh home game?
great. duke used to sell it's home games to the highest bidder. they stopped it because of the competition issue. you want to do the same to half the league by design.
lmao
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [94496]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 95657
Joined: 12/25/09
|
Yep, if Dook didn't share revenues with Clemson I wouldn't
Jul 7, 2012, 12:16 AM
|
|
care that all their home games were third tier and worthless.
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16557]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12872
Joined: 11/14/09
|
Dude, you're starting to creep me out a little.
Jul 7, 2012, 12:37 AM
[ in reply to where? where are these people of which you speak? ] |
|
Don't hijack a thread about playing more competitive teams because you're upset that UVA could lose a home game every other year until they raise their game up another notch which was discussed on a whole different thread.
You and others have more than covered that an ACC football division formed by the more competitive programs would be too hard of a schedule to play and would hurt a team's chances for the post-season. I don't think that speaks for everyone at all, but you definitely have company.
Didn't have to look very far, did I?
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [108392]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 64974
Joined: 2/25/06
|
i might be creeping you out, but i'm not crediting you with
Jul 7, 2012, 1:18 AM
|
|
things you never said; keep that stupidity to yourself and we'll be fine.
sorry i'm the only one that took the time to answer your idiocy. it won't happen again.
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16557]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12872
Joined: 11/14/09
|
My bad. Your beef wasn't against the toughness of schedule,
Jul 7, 2012, 2:27 AM
|
|
but the home game. Yeah I'm going to toss out what a division would look like when people are talking about cupcakes on schedules, because what the OP was talking about is about to come at a steep price. I got mixed up when you chimed in hijacking my response into something else.
I'm sure the status quo will work out just fine.
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [108392]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 64974
Joined: 2/25/06
|
it is your bad. glad we got that worked out. your
Jul 7, 2012, 8:20 AM
|
|
contention in throwing out your madness was putting the tougher teams in one division insuring they play each other year in, year out. sorry, it's not a stretch much less a hijack, when the op is discussing scheduling.
get it right at least once.
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16557]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12872
Joined: 11/14/09
|
Madness is doing the same things over and over and
Jul 8, 2012, 1:32 PM
|
|
expecting different results. I suppose the best solution is that everyone just needs to get better, right? That's going to be real interesting in the coming years as the league further diminishes the financial abilities of the teams it's counting on to save it, as well as saddling them with SOS challenges with the home game loss every other year and its OOC repercussions, plus the extra ACC team on the schedule (check out the new division rival FSU and Clemson has - that'll grow us something good - yeah, buddy). You can choose not to believe or understand this all you want to - it won't change what's coming down the pipeline.
The league needs significant change or football programs will leave because they can't afford to stay, despite the "seat at the table" and OB deal. It's not enough.
Ask the competitors who they want to play year in and year out, especially those competing and coaching at this level, and you're going to hear that they want to play the best as often as possible because it's part of a champion's nature to do so. You know, it's just possible that the ACC's manufactured division alignments since expansion to 12, which stress balance and watered down competition, do more harm than good to the league's more competitive teams. 2-13 BCS records, scant national opportunities, inexplicable losses to inferior teams, etc. Just wait until these competitive programs try to absorb the financial and scheduling hit on top of this once we go to 14.
Dream on.
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [94496]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 95657
Joined: 12/25/09
|
Dook and BC.***
Jul 7, 2012, 12:05 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [83459]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 80283
Joined: 11/29/99
|
LOL, how about NY Giants and Packers?***
Jul 7, 2012, 8:05 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [576]
TigerPulse: 46%
Posts: 1919
Joined: 7/30/11
|
Re: Drop the Cupcakes...who'd you rather play?
Jul 7, 2012, 8:32 AM
|
|
I would like to see OU play Clemson in the near future (it will never happen). It would be interesting to see how Bob's offense would do against Brent's defense.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2714]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 3602
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Drop the Cupcakes...who'd you rather play?
Jul 7, 2012, 8:46 AM
|
|
big12
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [142]
TigerPulse: 52%
Posts: 402
Joined: 6/5/12
|
Re: Drop the Cupcakes...who'd you rather play?
Jul 7, 2012, 9:10 AM
|
|
Give Dabo a few more years to build the Tigers, and all of the teams on our schedule will look like cupcakes. We might have to play all-star teams to get some competition.
CLEMSON = GREATNESS
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [576]
TigerPulse: 46%
Posts: 1919
Joined: 7/30/11
|
Re: Drop the Cupcakes...who'd you rather play?
Jul 7, 2012, 9:24 AM
|
|
shouldn't the schedule already be like that playing in the ACC?
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [929]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 628
Joined: 7/30/11
|
I'd like to play the real USC
Jul 8, 2012, 10:31 AM
|
|
Have we ever played them before?
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [142]
TigerPulse: 52%
Posts: 402
Joined: 6/5/12
|
Re: I'd like to play the real USC
Jul 8, 2012, 3:02 PM
|
|
As long as we beat South Carolina every year, I have know problem calling them USC. I'd rather South Carolina finish second to us every year and be called USC than to call a bunch of California rich kids USC. The better South Carolina (the state and its people) perform in education, sports, business, etc., the better. I sure as hell don't like being compared to Mississipi. As much we may not like to admit, we've got a lot more in common with South Carolina than we do Southern California.
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [32]
TigerPulse: 12%
Posts: 60
Joined: 4/28/12
|
nah
Jul 8, 2012, 11:21 AM
|
|
playing wake, duke, nc state, maryland, north carolina, and virginia is tough enough
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [929]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 628
Joined: 7/30/11
|
All but Wake have a winning record vs the coots^^^^***
Jul 8, 2012, 11:23 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7212]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9378
Joined: 7/11/03
|
Rotate among Georgia, Tennessee, Florida, Auburn...
Jul 8, 2012, 7:16 PM
|
|
Bama and LSU
|
|
|
|
Replies: 44
| visibility 5
|
|
|