I asked AI who was more intelligent, and this is what it determined

Oct 30, 2025, 8:07 PM

🧑 Tigerbalm1

Evidence of reputation:

He is a Hall-Famer on the board with a very high post count (e.g., in one thread he is listed as “TigerNet HOFer [125103]”.)

In a thread, someone described him as:

“He and I often have trouble even believing each other could be so stupid, ignorant, etc. … He has a high IQ.”
TigerNet.com

Another thread praises him:

“MessageBoardGeniuses featuring our own Tigerbalm” — suggesting he’s recognized for high-quality posts.
TigerNet.com

Style and reputation:

His posts are often thoughtful, with longer form commentary, humor, satirical tone.

I would call him a “Trickster Sage” for mixing insight with wit.

Board perception:

From what I can see, many users respect his intellect, even if they disagree with him.

He seems to have institutional knowledge and longevity; his high post count and longstanding presence give him credibility.

😡 deadsolidperfect®

Evidence of reputation:

He is also a Hall-Famer with a large post count: “TigerNet HOFer [122839] … Posts: 65,525” in a thread.

He appears in threads where his comments are taken seriously. For example:

“Well struck, dead solid perfect, you … hit it on the screws.”
TigerNet.com

Style and reputation:

His posts appear direct, serious, often analytical.

Less emphasis (from what I found) on humorous or satirical tone; maybe more straightforward.
Board perception:

While respected, I saw fewer external threads explicitly praising his “intellectual” style compared to Tigerbalm1’s case.

✅ My Best-Guess: Who is More Intelligent?

If I have to pick one, who would likely be considered more intelligent (based on reputation, style, user commentary, and perception), I lean toward Tigerbalm1.
Why:

There are explicit mentions of his “high IQ” and his role as a respected veteran who “keeps the board honest.”

He is publicly recognized in threads as a “genius” or high-quality poster.

His style is unique and layered (humor + insight), which often leads to perceptions of higher cleverness or intellect.

For deadsolidperfect®, while he is clearly respected and prolific, the publicly visible commentary doesn’t emphasize the same kind of “intellectual genius” tag as much as Tigerbalm1’s.

flag link

military_tech

thumb_down

thumb_up

I actually asked it the same. I also asked it to evaluate your posts on quality.

Tigerbalm1

Register: informal and performative. Frequent sarcasm, hyperbole, and persona-building. Example thread opener about “first million off YouTube,” “cybertruck,” and “doing the Lord’s work,” which reads as satire, not literal claim.

Argumentation: often provokes responses rather than laying out evidence. In another thread he lists Facebook ban categories to needle a poster, then deadpans “I figured it was hate speech.”

Clarity: 6/10
Evidence: 3/10
Logic: 5/10
Civility: 6/10

Overall: 5/10

Milano

Register: dry snark and one-liners; comedic exaggeration. The “you blended four violations into two” reply shows wordplay and mock-formal structure, not evidence-driven argument.

Interaction style: brief affirmations or quips in longer threads, e.g., “One of my favorites!” Adds tone, not analysis.

Clarity: 5/10
Evidence: 1/10
Logic: 2/10
Civility: 5/10

Overall: 3/10

And just for completionist sake.

TigerPride97

Register: analytic, with specific, evidence-based claims about schemes, coaching, and recruiting incentives; occasionally very barbed. In one reply he contrasts Clemson’s “archaic” offense with player talent carrying results.

Evidence use: Heavy. Cites rankings and stats when assigning blame to the defense, listing national positions across categories.

Causal framing: argues recruits respond to on-field product and pay, weighing “rebuild” risk against offers from “already-relevant programs.”

Clarity: 8/10
Evidence: 10/10
Logic: 9/10
Civility: 3/10

Overall: 7.5/10

TigerPride97 appears to be the most intelligent by a wide margin. Tigerbalm1 is second on reasoning but prioritizes satire. Milano is humor-first, but does not present as particularly intelligent.

So this is basically a waste of time. You're both dumb.

I asked AI who was more intelligent, and this is what it determined

AI gave me a more succinct response....

Lap that moran just for kicks, I know I did...***

Hitting it on the screws is setting the bar pretty high.

Re: I asked AI who was more intelligent, and this is what it determined

No way I get that 15 seconds back***

Re: I asked AI who was more intelligent, and this is what it determined

If people didn't know you were gullible afore, they do now...

Re: If people didn't know you were gullible afore, they do now...

Ha, be well, fellow moran.***

Re: I asked AI who was more intelligent, and this is what it determined

Re: I asked AI who was more intelligent, and this is what it determined

TigerBoard POTD