|
Replies: 15
| visibility 5
|
Scout Team [171]
TigerPulse: 42%
12
|
How did they shut out a team that averages
Sep 3, 2015, 9:45 PM
|
|
40 a game for the second half??? Fedora is an idiot!
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [10883]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 12942
Joined: 2012
|
Re: How did they shut out a team that averages
Sep 3, 2015, 9:46 PM
|
|
Did you watch the game or is this a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [284]
TigerPulse: 100%
14
|
Re: How did they shut out a team that averages
Sep 3, 2015, 9:55 PM
|
|
Well they threw 3 INTs in the red zone for starters. Plus two of them should have been TDs with wide open WR in the back of the end zone. It was hard to watch for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [238]
TigerPulse: 40%
13
|
If they were wide open they wouldn't have been intercepted.
Sep 3, 2015, 10:07 PM
|
|
They were covered with the defender in front (which was obvious to see) but the QB tried to force it their anyways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2102]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: How did they shut out a team that averages
Sep 3, 2015, 9:57 PM
|
|
> 40 a game for the second half??? Fedora is an idiot!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2930]
TigerPulse: 96%
33
|
They ran it down their throat to red zone then thought they
Sep 3, 2015, 10:11 PM
|
|
had to throw it. Hood had 135 yards on 12 carries but decided to put him on bench when entered red zone. That game shouldn't have been close. Fired that O,coordinator tonight
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [665]
TigerPulse: 87%
21
|
This is the same UNC team that got murdered by NC St. and
Sep 3, 2015, 10:13 PM
|
|
Rutgers to end the year last season. I just don't understand why people were favoring UNC in this game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7136]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
Posts: 10820
Joined: 2003
|
Re: This is the same UNC team that got murdered by NC St. and
Sep 3, 2015, 10:15 PM
|
|
This morning on talk radio, the betting expert said USC was a "safe bet." Guess someone was not favoring UNC. I wish both the freaking low class teams could have lost the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [238]
TigerPulse: 40%
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [665]
TigerPulse: 87%
21
|
Well throw some football knowledge on me then
Sep 3, 2015, 10:28 PM
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [238]
TigerPulse: 40%
13
|
UNC lost to Rutgers in the last game they played.
Sep 3, 2015, 10:35 PM
|
|
But just because they were playing SCar, people here thought they were world beaters and and would blow them out. Both were bad teams, and as you can imagine, the team that made less mistakes won. This never going to be a definitive win for either team if you looked at the matchup objectively, but that is something that morons on this board are incapable of doing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
I bet on SCar.
Sep 3, 2015, 10:47 PM
|
|
Won $100.
Would have been happy to lose it too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10883]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 12942
Joined: 2012
|
Re: UNC lost to Rutgers in the last game they played.
Sep 3, 2015, 11:34 PM
[ in reply to UNC lost to Rutgers in the last game they played. ] |
|
You're shocked that Tiger fans had USuCk losing to the UNCheat? You must be new to the rivalry.
Plus the coots sucked big time last season and lost a lot on offense...it certainly wasn't out of the realm of possibility that UNC could have won. You'd be an idiot if you think you won that game handily.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24060]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 20305
Joined: 2011
|
U mean, averaged LAST YEAR ?This is 2015 not 2014.
Sep 3, 2015, 10:22 PM
|
|
What I saw out of the UNCheat 2015 Offense tonight, unless some MAJOR changes are made, they'll never match their 2014 output.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1876]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
However, they gave the game to the coots-distressing.***
Sep 3, 2015, 10:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [4060]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
The ansswer would be your 2nd choice...
Sep 3, 2015, 11:01 PM
|
|
Fedora will have some serious explaining to do at the next booster club meeting. But, guess what? Heather Locklear, or whatever her name is, will rank Fedora as one of the top 2 coaches in the ACC over Dabo. Bank on it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 5
|
|
|
50
