|
Replies: 81
| visibility 10304
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 48614
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
1
Aug 5, 2025, 1:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [6983]
TigerPulse: 99%
41
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
5
5
Aug 5, 2025, 1:05 PM
|
|
Bear might not be able to actually see the games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1205]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
3
Aug 6, 2025, 6:29 AM
|
|
I don't know, he should be able to see next wk with how thick them coke bottles are!! Dude has bullet proof glass over his eyes! He can look into your soul with them magnifiers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [790]
TigerPulse: 100%
22
|
He looks like an
2
Aug 5, 2025, 1:10 PM
|
|
overweight version of Dana White.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [34466]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 17076
Joined: 2015
|
Re: He looks like an
1
Aug 5, 2025, 7:30 PM
|
|
overweight version of Dana White.
😂😂😂
INCREDIBLE!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1764]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
7
7
Aug 5, 2025, 1:13 PM
|
|
What people do not mention in the Texas game is the horrible clipping call that negated a pix-6. Had that call been overturned, as it should have been, then late in the game Clemson is tied and a different outcome is possible. I like having someone pulling back. We do have a tough schedule. We have many "losable" games, and we will get everyone's best shot. I think we can go undefeated, but I like having others pick against us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [598]
TigerPulse: 96%
20
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
2
Aug 5, 2025, 3:08 PM
|
|
Yes, totally agree and will add that Sammy Brown was bear hugged on the first Texas TD run on fourth down. That likely gets downgraded to a FG. Sammy was also bear hugged again later in a long run that led to a Texas TD. That drive might have failed. Along with the bad call on the pick six, that's -17 points. It was not even close to a fairly refereed game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [54067]
TigerPulse: 79%
59
Posts: 38725
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [25533]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 14807
Joined: 2013
|
Only lost by 2 to McNeese St.
3
1
Aug 5, 2025, 5:05 PM
|
|
That one was a nailbiter throughout.
~JKB
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2005]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: We were down 18 at halftime and lost by 14.
2
Aug 5, 2025, 5:19 PM
[ in reply to We were down 18 at halftime and lost by 14. ] |
|
I'm sorry but you are the last person who can talk about mental gymnastics. Brad Brownell could lose every game this year and you would spin it to look like he did something great.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [54067]
TigerPulse: 79%
59
Posts: 38725
Joined: 2003
|
No I wouldnt, and you know it.
3
Aug 5, 2025, 11:15 PM
|
|
At least our basketball team actually wins big games and punches above its weight class. Conversely, football is 0-5 in its last five games against top 5 teams, and 0-3 in its last 3 SEC games. Perhaps you should wait until our football team starts playing like a top team again before derailing a football thread in a pathetic attempt to discredit another CLEMSON team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [767]
TigerPulse: 61%
22
|
Re: No I wouldnt, and you know it.
Aug 6, 2025, 4:38 AM
|
|
At least our basketball team actually wins big games and punches above its weight class. Conversely, football is 0-5 in its last five games against top 5 teams, and 0-3 in its last 3 SEC games. Perhaps you should wait until our football team starts playing like a top team again before derailing a football thread in a pathetic attempt to discredit another CLEMSON team.
Why do you hate Clemson football so much
JK
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [109452]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 27131
Joined: 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7297]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
That's the funniest thing I've read all week
1
Aug 6, 2025, 3:14 PM
[ in reply to No I wouldnt, and you know it. ] |
|
and I read MSNBC!!!!
Thanks, Judge! I needed the laugh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2054]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Yes you would and WE KNOW IT
Aug 6, 2025, 4:09 PM
[ in reply to No I wouldnt, and you know it. ] |
|
... that's your problem. What in the world happened with you as far as Dabo ? Seriously. You need to dig deep or just admit it. I don't know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19088]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 12604
Joined: 2007
|
Re: No I wouldnt, and you know it.
1
Aug 6, 2025, 4:52 PM
[ in reply to No I wouldnt, and you know it. ] |
|
Dabo has 9 ACC championship, has appeared in 4 national finals, and won 2 national championships. Brownell has none of those. In the preceding 15 seasons before they each became full-time head coach, football finished ranked 4 times and basketball finished ranked 3 times. Basketball’s 14th place finish under Purnell was higher than any Clemson football team finish since 1990. So much for all the natural advantages of our basketball program. By any meaningful metric, basketball does not “win big games” or “punch above its weight class” relative to our football program. That’s a statement that simply demonstrates your contempt for Clemson. Something you can’t avoid even as you talk out the other side of your mouth and pretend you’re “excited” about this season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2538]
TigerPulse: 85%
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [64690]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 63904
Joined: 2007
|
Re: We were down 18 at halftime and lost by 14.
Aug 23, 2025, 11:11 PM
[ in reply to Re: We were down 18 at halftime and lost by 14. ] |
|
But if Brownell won every game, you would spin it into something negative towards the Judge even if his comments were in line with everybody else's. Haters will always hate, sickening isn't it!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [923]
TigerPulse: 92%
24
|
Re: We were down 18 at halftime and lost by 14.
3
Aug 5, 2025, 5:52 PM
[ in reply to We were down 18 at halftime and lost by 14. ] |
|
Every game, every week fans do that with their teams. It’s annoying. Texas was the better team and won.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [931]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Re: We were down 18 at halftime and lost by 14.
1
Aug 5, 2025, 9:30 PM
[ in reply to We were down 18 at halftime and lost by 14. ] |
|
If this statement came from a rationale-based, logical thinker, it would have merit. I actually agree with you to an extent. Blown calls on both sides, for sure. More blown against us, but still there were errors the other way as well.
But if this were basketball, you’d have 11,000 excuses and leaps of faith that make Jim Jones followers look sane.
Your biases are well known. Any “ability” to be rational about our football team is far overshadowed by your inability to get thine nose out of BB’s keister.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [54067]
TigerPulse: 79%
59
Posts: 38725
Joined: 2003
|
I didnt make excuses for our loss to McNeese State.
4
Aug 5, 2025, 11:24 PM
|
|
It was a poor performance and we deserved to lose. Period.
I can also get over that loss since I can point to some awesome performances and wins by our basketball team last year. We beat Kentucky, Duke, and UNC, and set a program record for wins. That eases the sting.
Unfortunately, I can’t do that for last year’s football team. What did we do to ease the pain of a double digit loss to Texas in the postseason? We lost to Georgia by 31 in an opener we were not prepared for, lost to the Coots, lost to Louisville, and played inconsistently all year. Our best win was against an overrated SMU team, and even that win wasn’t all our doing.
Our football program can’t claim be elite when it has been clear the last four years that we pad our win totals against teams that care way less than we do about football, and mostly lose to teams that care as much as we do about football. Hopefully this year we will turn the tide.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19088]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 12604
Joined: 2007
|
Re: I didnt make excuses for our loss to McNeese State.
1
Aug 6, 2025, 12:27 AM
|
|
Now do their relative tenures. No real Clemson fan is buying your schtick. It’s so stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [767]
TigerPulse: 61%
22
|
Re: I didnt make excuses for our loss to McNeese State.
2
Aug 6, 2025, 4:41 AM
[ in reply to I didnt make excuses for our loss to McNeese State. ] |
|
This guys absolute love of basketball, I’d swear your a dookie or tarhole in hiding, why bash the most important sport our school does, ya know the one that makes the money to allow the other sports to even exist
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7297]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
I've always tended to take comfort
Aug 7, 2025, 4:18 PM
[ in reply to I didnt make excuses for our loss to McNeese State. ] |
|
in the three national championships and umpteen ACC championships when the football team has a "down" year ("Down" meaning not winning the natty.)
I wish I could do same when the basketball team shats the bed every.single.season. But there isn't. Because CBB/the basketball team shat the bed every.single.season.
It's really a vicious cycle, is what it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [931]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Re: I didnt make excuses for our loss to McNeese State.
Aug 9, 2025, 2:46 PM
[ in reply to I didnt make excuses for our loss to McNeese State. ] |
|
I don’t camp out on here, running multiple businesses is tough, so sorry for the tardiness.
I can tell you, without any doubt whatsoever, any objective human can say that the McNeese St loss was waaaaay more humiliating than the Texas loss in FB. As for lessening the sting, I’d say getting rid of the problem on defense (Wes), having an unbelievably young team make it to the Texas game is a bit more impressive than making it into the bball tourney and completely folding.
Haven try you said a dozen times that in bball losses to inferior teams happens a good bit? If so, let’s chalk up 1.5 of those 3 good wins to that. Especially seeing how the team just collapsed down the line.
So, no, getting lucky and the ball bouncing out way in numerous games last year in bball doesn’t take the sting out of that McNeese loss. At all. Seeing a super young team compete despite being handcuffed by an idiot coaching the d gives hope for this year. Where is the hope for bball? In the transfers that we will POSSIBLY love for one year? It’s hard to even remember names year to year.
Haven’t been elite in football for a while. I’ve beat the internal hires drum ad nauseum. Seems that is remedied, for now.
To close: for years you’ve used the $ and support excuse for Brownell’s reason for underperforming. If it’s all about dollars, Clemson should’ve been beaten by 70 vs Texas. That’s a fact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2054]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: I think anyone on here with any kind of knowledge............
Aug 6, 2025, 7:38 AM
[ in reply to We were down 18 at halftime and lost by 14. ] |
|
knows your bias against Dabo and for bb. Just what exactly is the problem ? Really.
How about go to another forum ?
You have this really weird take on things. Something's not right.
Message was edited by: 86Orange®
Message was edited by: 86Orange®
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6727]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
1
Aug 5, 2025, 1:17 PM
|
|
Him being a Miami Hurricane football fan doesn't surprise me being down on Clemson. Him later working with the football team eventually led him to ESPN radio. Wouldn't say he is a football guru.
Reminds me of a heavier "Finebomb"
Sounds like he is Jealous of Clemson
We will see what turns out when the dust settles on the season.
GO TIGERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [54067]
TigerPulse: 79%
59
Posts: 38725
Joined: 2003
|
Why would he be jealous of Clemson?
1
2
Aug 5, 2025, 3:22 PM
|
|
I don't get this line of thinking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3243]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Why would he be jealous of Clemson?
3
Aug 5, 2025, 6:28 PM
|
|
Why are you so jealous of the football team?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4639]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Why would he be jealous of Clemson?
1
Aug 5, 2025, 6:41 PM
|
|
Because it has actually accomplished something and won a championship.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [34466]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 17076
Joined: 2015
|
But bUt BuT men's basketball has a Gold medal!!!!
1
Aug 5, 2025, 7:33 PM
|
|
😆🙄
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [54067]
TigerPulse: 79%
59
Posts: 38725
Joined: 2003
|
Why would I be jealous of Clemson football?
1
Aug 5, 2025, 11:26 PM
[ in reply to Re: Why would he be jealous of Clemson? ] |
|
Again, just a weird line of thinking to accuse people who say anything you don’t like of being jealous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2054]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: OH BS !
Aug 8, 2025, 2:20 PM
|
|
.. and, AGAIN, you know it. Answer the question.
BTW.. BB hasn't even gotten CLOSE to Dabo.... all due to HIM and nothing else.
Answer the question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9426]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
6
6
Aug 5, 2025, 1:26 PM
|
|
Can't disagree with much that he said. Our D was gashed several games last year, but I do think coaching matters so Coach Allen will be a difference maker for us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2029]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
6
6
Aug 5, 2025, 2:06 PM
|
|
A lot of that is factually correct and fair, IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7728]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [54067]
TigerPulse: 79%
59
Posts: 38725
Joined: 2003
|
Ten wins shouldnt be tough for us.
2
Aug 5, 2025, 11:32 PM
|
|
Of our 12 regular season games, 9 are against teams that place nowhere near the emphasis we do on football. We are way more talented and should absolutely beat teams like Boston College, Duke, Furman, Troy, Syracuse, etc.
That leaves LSU, Florida State, and South Carolina.
Even if we go 1-2 in these games, we are still 10-2.
We can also go 2-1 against the three real teams on our schedule, lose a game we shouldn’t, and finish with 10 wins.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2822]
TigerPulse: 64%
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7162]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
The gashing was poor scheme and poor effort... all fixable with the right coach***
Aug 5, 2025, 1:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2851]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
"Former" lol***
Aug 5, 2025, 1:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3623]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
1
Aug 5, 2025, 1:45 PM
|
|
There’s a reason he got fired. If you actually watched him, he was wrong a lot more than he was right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12200]
TigerPulse: 64%
47
Posts: 15211
Joined: 2006
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
1
2
Aug 5, 2025, 1:47 PM
|
|
We don't know what we don't know and LSU doesn't know what a don't know so buckle up the chin straps for an epic battle. Since the game is not a conference game it is not a must win for either team but for national perception, it really is. There should not one person who makes the mistake of thinking this will be anything but a 60 minute slugfest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [83829]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 31314
Joined: 2018
|
Speaking of slugs***
3
Aug 5, 2025, 6:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [29685]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
|
Re: Speaking of slugs***
1
Aug 5, 2025, 7:01 PM
|
|
Good old valley coot 🤣
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9595]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
4
Aug 5, 2025, 1:53 PM
|
|
Well we didn't look great at times last season, even on offense, so I can kinda see where people want to see us do it before they totally get on board. Yes we did acquit ourselves pretty well against Texas but we also beat SMU on a miracle FG, barely beat a meh Pitt team on a 50 yd QB scramble and had another ugly win against Va Tech. Sandwiched among those games was a loss to SC and the Citadel running for 300 yds against us. So if you look at the second half of our season last year there are a lot of reasons to doubt we are suddenly gonna be unstoppable this year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19061]
TigerPulse: 95%
52
Posts: 27574
Joined: 2006
|
hes not wrong though as myself and others on here have stated
2
Aug 5, 2025, 2:06 PM
|
|
i recall us struggling against pitt, louisville, south carolina and a few other teams last season. had a great second half against texas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [35935]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 19765
Joined: 2008
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
Aug 5, 2025, 2:26 PM
|
|
I stopped counting the times "the Bear" was wrong on nearly all of his pregame picks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1828]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
2
Aug 5, 2025, 3:33 PM
|
|
I don't bet on games much anymore but I used to just fade everything he picked on Gameday and it turned out pretty good. If this guy likes your team you're in trouble.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [41068]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 23041
Joined: 2003
|
Bear should stick to cruising Chuck E Cheese parking
Aug 5, 2025, 2:26 PM
|
|
Lots in his “free candy” van.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22795]
TigerPulse: 99%
53
Posts: 19722
Joined: 2004
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
Aug 5, 2025, 2:27 PM
|
|
Figures! Bear works for FOX and BIG now...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4700]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
4
Aug 5, 2025, 2:29 PM
|
|
I agree with him somewhat. I’ve got to see it to believe it. I think we will be an improved team. How improved remains to be seen. I wish the media wouldn’t be hyping Clemson up so much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62386]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 45932
Joined: 2003
|
Clemsonsuzi says..."hey..he kinda looks like......"
5
5
Aug 5, 2025, 2:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10248]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Hes shaded Clemson before
1
Aug 5, 2025, 2:57 PM
|
|
Dude can barely see anyway
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1086]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
1
Aug 5, 2025, 3:02 PM
|
|
Do you trust a guy looking through 2-inch thick glasses? He's still butt-hurt that Clemson has won more head-to-head games since 2010 against Ohio State and Notre Dame. HE CAN"T HANDLE THE TRUTH !!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7609]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
1
Aug 5, 2025, 3:03 PM
|
|
Of all the times, that I saw this goober on gameday, I can't recall him ever making a correct call. He is just a clown that they use as some kind of comic relief.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10248]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
1
Aug 5, 2025, 4:18 PM
|
|
They sat him in the corner like a dog
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7297]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Who cares what that yak-tongued
Aug 5, 2025, 3:04 PM
|
|
flapwagon has to say about anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [54067]
TigerPulse: 79%
59
Posts: 38725
Joined: 2003
|
He isn't wrong about last year.
4
3
Aug 5, 2025, 3:20 PM
|
|
While winning the ACC and making the CFP are nice accomplishments last year, we were clearly not one of the best teams in the country. As he mentioned, we were blown out by Georgia, lost to SC, lost to Louisville, and probably should have lost to both Pitt and SMU. We didn't do anything last year to suggest that we were an elite team, or that we were poised this year to be dramatically better.
We shouldn't be beating our chests for "only" losing to Texas by 14. If we want to be elite, we need to win those games or at least keep it close. We didn't.
Any predictions for us to be national championship contenders require that we be significantly better this year. Can that happen? It sure can. I believe that our defense will be a lot better. I expect Cade to have even better rapport with his receivers. Our line should be a strength. But there are some concerns too. Do we have the talent to compete with top 5 teams? Do we have the poise to not make critical errors during crunch time? Do we have the coaching to develop our players and help them get better?
Time will tell. I haven't read the comments yet, but when I do I anticipate that they will mostly be critical of this guy and of ESPN, with statements about how we are being disrespected and how awesome we will be. I hope that's true, but you can't blame people for being hesitant to buy into the hype. It's been half a decade since we've met preseason expectations. Here's to this year being different.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7297]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
I've never understood
1
2
Aug 5, 2025, 3:29 PM
|
|
"He isn't wrong." It's the emasculated, glass-jawed version of "He's absolutely right."
In other words, stop back-pedaling. Lean in to that Eeyore-like disposition of yours. You'll be happier! We'll be happier! Brad will be happier!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19120]
TigerPulse: 95%
52
Posts: 28831
Joined: 2003
|
Well why don't you tell us what he was wrong about?***
1
Aug 5, 2025, 6:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7297]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Goodness. Do try and keep up.
Aug 6, 2025, 3:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19088]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 12604
Joined: 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7297]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Like Private Pyle from Full Metal Jacket,
Aug 7, 2025, 4:12 PM
|
|
don't stop what you're doing to help him do what he's doing. He'll figure things out hopefully eventually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2054]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Stop explaining what football needs to be elite
Aug 8, 2025, 2:22 PM
[ in reply to He isn't wrong about last year. ] |
|
They've been there multiple times to the top of the mountain.... bb & bb have not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1828]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
Aug 5, 2025, 3:31 PM
|
|
Lol yeah this guy is lost. Saying South Carolina is going to get more than 7.5 wins easily when they look like an 8-4 win team AT BEST... And Clemson isn't losing 3 regular season games. It just isn't happening... unless the defense completely comes out flat again in which case it might be ok in the end because we can bring Venables back after he gets fired.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1154]
TigerPulse: 96%
26
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
Aug 5, 2025, 3:43 PM
|
|
This guys opinion is worth about as much as a wet fart
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8864]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
Aug 5, 2025, 4:08 PM
|
|
Good!! We have heard enough "Rat Poison" to last a decade.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1115]
TigerPulse: 100%
26
|
another blowhard making his argument on last year team.
Aug 5, 2025, 4:17 PM
|
|
That team doesn't exist and this year's team isn't set yet. These guys have opinions and spout nonsense to justify their paycheck. Ms. Cleo had more credibility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17393]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 18660
Joined: 1999
|
This is great messaging. 1) I'm glad he's acknowledging that we have a tough
1
Aug 5, 2025, 4:22 PM
|
|
schedule. BC, GT, SMU, Louisville...he's almost acting like schools in the ACC play football (probably the REAL reason he got fired...ha ha). Of course Top 10 LSU and Top 15 SC. It's a tough schedule.
2) He's not wrong. We have a lot of questions that need answering...RB, run D, etc.
Gotta be tired of the rat poison by now. Time for some expert doubt. Time for some "We have to prove 'em wrong."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2180]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: it's a very logical and factual take and I tend to agree..
2
Aug 5, 2025, 4:30 PM
|
|
I know we SHOULD be better this year but we have had some inconsistencies even on offense in recent years, including injuries, which probably happens at some point again .. it's football.
I expect us to go compete for a national title but we have a lot to prove and it starts against LSU.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9427]
TigerPulse: 98%
44
|
Dude is a buffoon. One of the most clueless takes Ive ever read.***
Aug 5, 2025, 4:36 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [792]
TigerPulse: 75%
22
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
Aug 5, 2025, 5:32 PM
|
|
Here we go again........another jock sniffing, frustrated wanna be athlete that is nothing but a keyboard goofball. Why would anyone in their right mind pay attention to this Pillsbury Dough Boy, wtih a head that resembles a que ball and glasses thick as coke bottles? Never played 1 down of organized athletics just sits on a keyboard and BLAH,BLAH, BLAH. Him, Paul Finebaum, Stephen A, Colin Cowherd, Nick Wright, Skip Bayless are a bunch of ###### bags who need to #### on sports related matters. On August 30th all questions will be answered.
GO TIGER!!! BEAT LSU!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [83829]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 31314
Joined: 2018
|
Stopped reading at gutted defense.
1
Aug 5, 2025, 6:02 PM
|
|
The fugg is he talking about "gutted" 😂
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [-82]
TigerPulse: 78%
-1
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
Aug 5, 2025, 6:41 PM
|
|
lol, Former analyst.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4639]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
Aug 5, 2025, 6:43 PM
|
|
Im not really a fan of this dweeb. He's nothing more than a degenerate gambler and less charismatic modern day version of Jimmy The Greek. Not saying hes not correct on a few things, but he never really gives us any credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4927]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
Aug 5, 2025, 7:11 PM
|
|
The key word is "FORMER" ESPN analyst. If he was actually good or unique at his job he wouldn't be a "former" analyst. As it stands his opinion carries no more weight than mine or yours.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [10007]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Who? Never heard of her.***
Aug 5, 2025, 10:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1269]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
Aug 5, 2025, 11:35 PM
|
|
Well keep in mind this is a GameDay gimmic Camerman turned expert. snd collector of fools money who pay for his pucks. Might as well lusten to Big Ears communication major with no knowledge of the sport.
Just pkay the games!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1205]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Love it! Fuel the fire in that locker room!!
Aug 6, 2025, 6:25 AM
|
|
We need the ammo! Too much love going around and making these boys think they're invincible. Go Tigers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21730]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 19118
Joined: 2012
|
agree for the most part with with the 2024 Fallica retrospective put forward
Aug 6, 2025, 8:32 AM
|
|
but my agreement with him ends there
I think Schwartz has the better take/perspecitve. We have not only many returners but returners with talent..many with NFL talent.
Skill on offense. O-Line appears to be one of the better ones in recent memory (though we often hear that and ….well, we will see).
Stertong d efense - especially that front lone - scary.
Haven’t paid as much attention in 2025 so far because of work and the rest of real life - so my concern is depth. Maybe we have it. Maybe not.
I’ll hang up and listen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3811]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: TNET: Former ESPN analyst: "I'm pumping the brakes on this Clemson love affair"
Aug 6, 2025, 10:05 AM
|
|
He picked games against the spread on ESPN College Gameday. Always well below .500. It’s good he’s pumping the brakes on us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [25970]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 16604
Joined: 1995
|
I agree.
Aug 23, 2025, 11:12 PM
|
|
People think we are going to all of a sudden learn how to tackle with 7 months of Allen? I mean I hope, but nah bro.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 81
| visibility 10304
|
|
|
50
.png)
