Replies: 22
| visibility 1861
|
Clemson Icon [24052]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 15552
Joined: 1995
|
The 2nd Amendment is Still Part of the Constitution, Right?
5
5
Feb 6, 2025, 8:25 PM
|
|
So let me get this straight... MAGA used to be all about defending the Constitution. But now that Musk is tossing parts of it in the shredder, suddenly they’re cool with stricter government control? Does this mean they're ready for some sensible gun laws too? No?
Weird. Almost like they only care about the Constitution when it fits their playbook.
If you think Musk’s government takeover is totally fine, let me break it down:
📌 Separation of Powers? Torched. Musk decided Congress doesn't matter and started shutting down agencies on his own. That’s not "efficiency"—that’s ignoring the rules of the law.
📌 Government Data? Wide Open. DOGE (seriously, that's the name) now has access to Treasury payment systems, leading to lawsuits over privacy concerns. Ever trust a billionaire with your bank info? No? Thought so.
📌 Federal Employees? Benched. People are getting forced out of government jobs without due process. You know, the same deep state that suddenly doesn’t seem so deep anymore?
📌 Constitutional Crisis? Inbound. Legal experts say Musk is testing the limits of presidential power. This doesn’t end well.
So, what’s the deal? Are we still pretending to care about the Constitution, or do we only bring it up when it's politically convenient? Tough questions.
I’ll hang up and listen.
|
|
|
 |
Paw Master [17045]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 18482
Joined: 2015
|
Et tu, Joy Behar?***
3
Feb 6, 2025, 8:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Tiger [38272]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 43914
Joined: 2001
|
extreme MAGA***
1
Feb 6, 2025, 8:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Valley Legend [12394]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
Posts: 12884
Joined: 1999
|
funny how the swamp started with Congress and now it's the entire government***
Feb 6, 2025, 9:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2217]
TigerPulse: 97%
32
|
Trump quite literally said he could ignore the Constitution.***
1
Feb 6, 2025, 9:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Phenom [14755]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
|
Here ya go...
6
6
Feb 6, 2025, 9:10 PM
|
|
Claim: Separation of Powers? Torched. Musk decided Congress doesn't matter and started shutting down agencies on his own. That’s not "efficiency"—that’s ignoring the rules of the law.
Fact: DOGE is only auditing and making recommendations to the Executive Office of the President (EOP) and Agency Administrators. From that point either the President or Agency leadership makes a decision on cutting a program, contract or removal of workers. No Statutory Agency has been permanently shut down or disbanded as that takes an act of Congress.
Claim: Government Data? Wide Open. DOGE (seriously, that's the name) now has access to Treasury payment systems, leading to lawsuits over privacy concerns. Ever trust a billionaire with your bank info? No? Thought so.
Facts: All DOGE audit members are in fact permanent or Special Government Employees (including Elon Musk who is an SGE) and have been granted proper security clearances. Furthermore each Federal Agency was instructed by EO to do the following:
"In consultation with USDS (United States DOGE Service), each Agency Head shall establish within their respective Agencies a DOGE Team of at least four employees, which may include Special Government Employees, hired or assigned within thirty days of the date of this Order. Agency Heads shall select the DOGE Team members in consultation with the USDS Administrator. Each DOGE Team will typically include one DOGE Team Lead, one engineer, one human resources specialist, and one attorney. Agency Heads shall ensure that DOGE Team Leads coordinate their work with USDS and advise their respective Agency Heads on implementing the President‘s DOGE Agenda." So each Agency has it's own DOGE members "in house". Specific to the Treasury Dept: Via Justice Dept and Court ruling yesterday - "Tom Krause and Marko Elez, two DOGE-connected “special government employees” of the Treasury Department, were granted “read-only” access to Bureau of Fiscal Service systems “as needed for the performance” of their respective duties, the judge ruled.
Also see this: https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1887654927314325753
Claim: Federal Employees? Benched. People are getting forced out of government jobs without due process. You know, the same deep state that suddenly doesn’t seem so deep anymore?
Facts: As the Agency DOGE teams look at a particular Agency they have opted to put SOME Federal workers on "paid leave" and/or "freeze" their access as they conduct the audit. As the DOGE conducts it's audit and provides information to the Agency head and the EOP - decisions are being made (among many) as to what contracts may be cancelled/kept and what Federal positions may no longer be required. It is not unusual for Federal workers to lose their jobs when an Agency decides the function they were performing is no longer required or that section of the Agency is going away. I saw this happen many times inside the DoD under EVERY Administration - Democrat and Republican. On top of this - Federal workers have been offered an opportunity to leave Federal employment with an 8 month severance package. 60,000 Federal workers have shown interest in this offer and I dare say most private sector employees would not get this good of a deal.
Claim: Constitutional Crisis? Inbound. Legal experts say Musk is testing the limits of presidential power. This doesn’t end well.
Facts: The only court ruling regarding DOGE to date is that the Treasury must limit access to "2" members of the Treasury DOGE team. The Judge must recognize DOGE is legal otherwise they would not have granted members of the DOGE team read-access to the full Treasury database for the "performance of their respective duties". I suggest you read the actual EO that created DOGE: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/establishing-and-implementing-the-presidents-department-of-government-efficiency/ DOGE's formation and what they are doing is well within the President's Executive authority, the Constitution and our laws - specifically section 3161 of title 5, United States Code.
Also recommend you read my previous post here: https://www.tigernet.com/clemson-forum/message/short-answer-is-because-they-are-government-employees...-36377150#36377150
|
|
|
|
 |
Asst Coach [817]
TigerPulse: 58%
23
|
Re: Here ya go...
Feb 7, 2025, 8:13 AM
|
|
Keep on dreaming those sick disgusting dreams. You sheep are a disgrace.
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [27850]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 48316
Joined: 2010
|
That's one way to respond re your obvious stupidity...***
Feb 8, 2025, 10:36 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [8392]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: The 2nd Amendment is Still Part of the Constitution, Right?
Feb 6, 2025, 9:25 PM
|
|
You can certainly tell which board morons hang out too much on reddit.
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Day Hero [4445]
TigerPulse: 96%
36
|
Re: The 2nd Amendment is Still Part of the Constitution, Right?
Feb 6, 2025, 9:38 PM
|
|
Just wait until the cage match between Bannon and Musk…they are not on the same page, to say the least.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Phenom [14755]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
|
Steve Bannon is a gaslighting carnival barker that the Trump Administration
1
Feb 6, 2025, 9:50 PM
|
|
would do well to keep far away...
Bannon loves to pretend he and his particular echo chamber are the judges/purveyors of "true MAGA" and as such lay claim that they are the ones who got Trump re-elected. It's all a horseshid shtick...
The truth is that Bannon does everything in his power to cling to Trumps political ball sack in order to make a living. As such Bannon will say/do whatever is necessary to promote his own interests over all others. He claims to be the purveyor of the real MAGA agenda in order to mine his limited MAGA echo chamber for every dollar he can get out of it. Part and parcel to Bannon's scheme is that he likes for his audience to believe he has a lot of influence with Trump. Enter Elon Musk who actually does have a lot of influence with Trump and Bannon is going to start throwing a tantrum towards Musk.
The fact is Bannon pretends a lot of things but did very little towards getting Trump elected. He.ll, Bannon was radio silent sitting in jail for the 3 months leading up to the election. Other than the Trump campaign, there are 3 organizations that did the heavy lifting that moved the needle to get Trump elected. Elon Musk's America Pac, Scott Presler's ground operations, and Charlie Kirk's Turning Point organizations did a thousand times more real work towards getting Trump votes than anything Bannon has EVER done.
At this point I don't really think Bannon has much influence with Trump. Musk is tied to Trump's hip and no matter how many temper tantrums Bannon may throw - that ain't gonna change.
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [2684]
TigerPulse: 95%
33
|
Re: Steve Bannon is a gaslighting carnival barker that the Trump Administration
Feb 6, 2025, 10:25 PM
|
|
Bannon is not well mentally. Sick dude.
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [2684]
TigerPulse: 95%
33
|
Re: The 2nd Amendment is Still Part of the Constitution, Right?
Feb 6, 2025, 10:23 PM
|
|
GOP been hypocrites for years.
They want less government, but the states are gonna tell a woman what to do with her pregnancy.
They want less government, but we’re gonna throw around a bunch of tariffs.
They want less government, but they’re gonna tell us which books our kids can read in school.
They want less government, but DeSantis went full throttle trying to crush one of Florida’s largest employers.
They want less government, but The federal government continues to spends billions of dollars each year subsidizing the coal industry.
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [27850]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 48316
Joined: 2010
|
What's it like to be a consistent LOSER...?***
Feb 7, 2025, 8:40 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [18974]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 10943
Joined: 2016
|
Re: The 2nd Amendment is Still Part of the Constitution, Right?
2
Feb 7, 2025, 8:49 PM
|
|
What's unconstitional about identifying corruption and waste of taxpayers money? When federal employees get under 2.5 million, we'll be going in the right direction.
Areas looked at so far are under the Executive branch. Presidential perogative.
How do you audit without access? You can't!
Cut the waste and get rid of the dead wood. You can't watch Netflix at home all day and expect pay for nothing forever.
What legal experts? The ones that have been getting rich off the taxpayers for decades.
What's so bad about exposing the corruption that has crept into the government? Can you direct me to the amendment or article of the constitution that says corruption and stealing taxpayer money is acceptable? I'm having a hard time finding it.
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1905]
TigerPulse: 85%
31
|
Re: The 2nd Amendment is Still Part of the Constitution, Right?
1
Feb 8, 2025, 6:19 AM
|
|
Trump is your President
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [5720]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
You guys are nuts
1
Feb 8, 2025, 10:54 AM
|
|
The notion that a president cannot fire a federal employee without due process is laughable
Due process doesn’t apply to employment and the courts will settle that
The notion that the president cannot direct someone to inspect the government’s spending data is hilarious too. This should be one of the President’s primary executive powers
Finally, and this one is the biggest. The notion that the president has to spend every penny allocated by congress has got to be the absolute dumbest notion a liberal mind has ever conceived. If a president and the executive branch can save money, do things more efficiently, and eliminate wasteful spending that should be celebrated.
But no, you morons are challenging it in court. Doing everything you can to spend this country into a third world crap hole
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [24158]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 13640
Joined: 2007
|
Due process does indeed apply to employment of federal employees***
Feb 8, 2025, 11:00 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [24158]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 13640
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Due process does indeed apply to employment of federal employees***
Feb 8, 2025, 11:06 AM
|
|
Unlike private-sector workers, federal employees can’t be fired instantly. Government agencies must follow a specific procedure to fire someone. This process requires them to have documented performance- or conduct-based reasons for removing an employee. It also requires them to allow an employee to challenge a removal before they’re officially terminated from a federal government job.
https://www.pinesfederal.com/legal-blog/legal-rights-for-fired-federal-employees/
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [27850]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 48316
Joined: 2010
|
Good... Time for them to lawyer-up and see how it feels.***
Feb 8, 2025, 11:13 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [5720]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7453]
TigerPulse: 87%
42
Posts: 10103
Joined: 2001
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [27850]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 48316
Joined: 2010
|
Where were you when Biden was sidestepping SCOTUS ruling on Student Loans?***
Feb 11, 2025, 12:21 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 22
| visibility 1861
|
|
|