Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
Did we already talk about the Charlotte Richmond game?
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 11
| visibility 1

Did we already talk about the Charlotte Richmond game?


Mar 15, 2013, 10:26 AM

8FTs in 4.7 seconds to win

http://www.sbnation.com/college-basketball/2013/3/14/4104940/2013-atlantic-10-tournament-charlotte-richmond-video-finish-ending-technicals

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Did we already talk about the Charlotte Richmond game?


Mar 15, 2013, 10:29 AM

Sometimes I agree that refs should let players play at the end of the game but players can't be stupid and expect the refs to let it slide. The player brought it on himself with the push and you can't blame someone else when you make a mistake.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


Agree on that


Mar 15, 2013, 10:30 AM

The Charlotte player played it perfectly, he suckered the defender into pushing him, but once the arms are extended the ref can't not call it. And if it's called it's a T since it's a dead ball scenario.

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


I see both sides of this....


Mar 15, 2013, 10:37 AM [ in reply to Re: Did we already talk about the Charlotte Richmond game? ]

obviously a push... but I think the official has to account for game situation a little there too. Do you really want to give a tech in that situation?

Consider the Charlotte player was on the outside, and originally had a headlock on the Richmond player. That said, the Richmond guy has to have more control.

Later, there is NO EXCUSE for giving Charlotte 3 FTs.. NONE.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"I've been working since I was 15 continually until now. I worked 40 hours a week at 15, when it wasn't even legal for 15 year olds to work that many hours."


The 3 FT's was a bad call in my opinion


Mar 15, 2013, 10:41 AM

But the coach really put the nail in the coffin with is reaction.

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


hard to blame him though.... after the "T" and then the


Mar 15, 2013, 10:44 AM

3 FTs

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"I've been working since I was 15 continually until now. I worked 40 hours a week at 15, when it wasn't even legal for 15 year olds to work that many hours."


Re: I see both sides of this....


Mar 15, 2013, 10:47 AM [ in reply to I see both sides of this.... ]

As much as I hate to see a call determine a game a part of me thinks it is crazy to suggest a call shouldn't be made because of the situation. It is the refs job to call a fair game both ways. Just because one team committed the foul early and the other team waited until the end you can't call one foul and not the other. It is the players job to know the situation of the game and not cost their team a win not the refs job.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


All I know


Mar 15, 2013, 10:54 AM [ in reply to I see both sides of this.... ]

is Clemson would have missed all of thosr foul shots

badge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Orange Googlers Unite

Save Tigernet--Boot the coots(you know who I mean).


How is that an automatic technical?


Mar 15, 2013, 11:30 AM [ in reply to Re: Did we already talk about the Charlotte Richmond game? ]

The reason they stated was that the free throw was made so the play was dead.

Well, if that is the case, wouldn't any foul committed on an inbounds play after a made basket also be a technical foul? The shot was made and the clock hasn't started.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: How is that an automatic technical?


Mar 15, 2013, 11:34 AM

Yes. It should be.

badge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


Re: Did we already talk about the Charlotte Richmond game?


Mar 15, 2013, 11:43 AM

For what it's worth, the Over/Under in Vegas was 130.5. Total points scored: 131.

Justtt sayin.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Let them play at end of game


Mar 15, 2013, 11:43 AM

I really hate when the refs "swallow their whistle" in the last few seconds of the game and don't call it the same way they called the rest of the game. A foul is a foul whether it happens at the 19:59 mark or the 0:01.2 mark on the clock. I applaud the refs in the Charlotte game for calling it as the rules are written. Doesn't matter that there were less than 5 seconds left.

badge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 11
| visibility 1

TigerBoard POTD

Hill Watch 50 days!!!

by O.J.

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic