|
Replies: 13
| visibility 1564
|
CU Medallion [19053]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 18878
Joined: 2010
|
Tom Luginbill just said on ACCN Clemson defense had gaping holes for LSU to
1
Aug 31, 2025, 9:15 AM
|
|
run through and Clemson has too much talent for that. He thought that would have gotten fixed from last year.
|
|
|
|
 |
MVP [519]
TigerPulse: 97%
19
|
Re: Tom Luginbill just said on ACCN Clemson defense had gaping holes for LSU to
1
Aug 31, 2025, 9:18 AM
|
|
Or why didn’t we make any adjustments? It was blatantly obvious what LSU’s gameplan was, which were quick pass attempts, less than 3 steps and ball was out. Had way too much space in the middle of the field and kept getting burnt on counters
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11518]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 13429
Joined: 2014
|
Maybe so, but the defense wasn't the problem last night! If we hold a team to 17
3
Aug 31, 2025, 9:19 AM
|
|
points, we should win the game!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24725]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 19228
Joined: 1998
|
Garret Riley made about $200,000 last night on per game basis***
Aug 31, 2025, 9:20 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1727]
TigerPulse: 61%
31
|
Re: Garret Riley made about $200,000 last night on per game basis***
Aug 31, 2025, 9:27 AM
|
|
What did Dabo make ? When do people hold him accountable ? He is right here on sidelines , can he not see obvious issues ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11907]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Re: Garret Riley made about $200,000 last night on per game basis***
Aug 31, 2025, 9:57 AM
|
|
Roughly $950k.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [519]
TigerPulse: 97%
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5795]
TigerPulse: 89%
39
|
Re: Maybe so, but the defense wasn't the problem last night! If we hold a team to 17
Aug 31, 2025, 9:26 AM
|
|
Yea well they didn't....period...Someone had to stop them and the defense did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [25965]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 16603
Joined: 1995
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7361]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13893
Joined: 2015
|
Re: They had a TD called back and how many TOs? 2 or 3?***
Aug 31, 2025, 10:32 AM
|
|
Defense played more them good enough to win the game. They can't hold them forever when the O goes 3 and out over and over again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1168]
TigerPulse: 94%
26
|
Re: Maybe so, but the defense wasn't the problem last night! If we hold a team to 17
1
Aug 31, 2025, 9:25 AM
[ in reply to Maybe so, but the defense wasn't the problem last night! If we hold a team to 17 ] |
|
This is an example of the stats not telling the entire story. Just like people pimping Cades stats after the Texas game. They ring hollow. Lets call a spade a spade. We got lucky with the overturned touchdown. I'll take it, but that was pure luck. Had that call been reversed for Clemson we would have been irate. Whenever LSU needed to keep a drive alive in the second half they were successful. Our Lbs were out of position, took poor angles, or washed outta the play entirely. Our leading tackler was a safety, that shoukd say something. Our vaunted d-line? Not really a factor. Yes they got the ball out quickly, but we never adjusted. When LSU countered in the second half with screens and outside counters they were successful. Lets remember too LSU didnt need to be aggressive. All they had to do was punt and let our hapless offense go 3 and out. We played well in the first half. LSU adjusted after half and took control of the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [519]
TigerPulse: 97%
19
|
Re: Maybe so, but the defense wasn't the problem last night! If we hold a team to 17
1
Aug 31, 2025, 9:28 AM
|
|
And now we have a mobile Haynes King coming up on the road.. oh joy
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7361]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13893
Joined: 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7361]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13893
Joined: 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 13
| visibility 1564
|
|
|
50
