|
Replies: 37
| visibility 870
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46562
Joined: 2012
|
Football Update: ESPN Prediction on Clemson-SC
Nov 25, 2013, 3:53 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Campus Hero [13551]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 16895
Joined: 2010
|
Sounds about right***
Nov 25, 2013, 3:54 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [185]
TigerPulse: 100%
12
|
Mark, did you reply to your own post?*****
Nov 25, 2013, 4:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2783]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
What does this writeup have to do with the game?
Nov 25, 2013, 3:57 PM
|
|
He's a tool. I think it's well known that he is completely down on Clemson. He hopes and yearns for us to lose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [502]
TigerPulse: 85%
19
|
I'm not saying we can't lose, but.....
Nov 25, 2013, 3:58 PM
|
|
Mark Schlabach predicting a Clemson loss to USC is akin to Paul Finebaum predicting an Alabama victory over Auburn. Schlabach is an SEC homer and has never liked the Tigers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2926]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Totally agree, not surprised and glad he picked them!***
Nov 25, 2013, 7:08 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [261]
TigerPulse: 22%
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [68]
TigerPulse: 55%
7
|
He done works for eSECpn, what did you expect?***
Nov 25, 2013, 4:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [69782]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90820
Joined: 2001
|
E$ecPN going with the $EC team....
Nov 25, 2013, 4:03 PM
|
|
now there's a shocker !!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11024]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
This is a misrepresentation...should be
Nov 25, 2013, 4:04 PM
|
|
SEC hack's prediction on Clemson SC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [399]
TigerPulse: 100%
16
|
Re: This is a misrepresentation...should be
Nov 25, 2013, 4:07 PM
|
|
PROTECT YOUR INVESTMENT!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [0]
TigerPulse: 52%
1
|
Re: Football Update: ESPN Prediction on Clemson-SC
Nov 25, 2013, 4:06 PM
|
|
Not a shock that we're not favored to win. Away game and they're basing future success on past losses.
Regardless of what happens, it's highly likely we're going to the Orange either way, whereas SCar CANNOT lose one game if they want a bowl outside of Tampa or Atlanta.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [3]
TigerPulse: 62%
1
|
Re: Football Update: ESPN Prediction on Clemson-SC
Nov 25, 2013, 4:38 PM
|
|
Well.... technically SCAR can lose to us, still win the SEC EAST, win the SEC Champ and go to the Sugah. : )
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2275]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
More like ESPN Mark Schlabach's Wet Dream on Clemson-SC
Nov 25, 2013, 4:07 PM
|
|
That tool hates Clemson! and USuC is an SEC Butt Buddy! I'm sure that in his pea brain head, it would make the dawgs win over the chickens look better. He can only hope.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10688]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Schlabach is still butthurt we whipped his puppies***
Nov 25, 2013, 4:07 PM
|
|
nm
Message was edited by: CTiger423®
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
schlabach is just butthurt,period. and he enjoys it.
Nov 25, 2013, 4:27 PM
|
|
ok, i couldn't resist that jab at him. the prick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [59298]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 45081
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2507]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
We beat SC in 2008 34-17
Nov 25, 2013, 4:16 PM
|
|
But I guess he forgot that and I love how he doesn't actually give any reasoning behind his prediction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [9014]
TigerPulse: 97%
43
|
I think he was talking about in Cootlumbia***
Nov 16, 2022, 1:55 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2507]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Yeah caught that after a second reading.
Nov 16, 2022, 12:50 PM
|
|
Still the fact remains that he didn't explain his position well at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2882]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: We beat SC in 2008 34-17
Nov 25, 2013, 4:29 PM
[ in reply to We beat SC in 2008 34-17 ] |
|
There is no way USuC goes to a BCS bowl unless they win the SEC(Period) They have 2 losses one to an unranked Tennessee team. Auburn will get that bit even if they lose to Bama they would have 2 losses to ranked teams. Guess what only 2 teams from each conference can go to BCS bowl. No way Bama doesn't make it. So again the SEC homers don't understand only two (2). They will have to win the SEC so this week means nothing to their BCS hopes. Tennessee took that away unless they back into the SEC Championship game and the state of Alabama blows up. Go Tigers send the coots to the toilet bowl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [651]
TigerPulse: 95%
21
|
He acts like that was a long time ago, but
Nov 25, 2013, 6:02 PM
[ in reply to We beat SC in 2008 34-17 ] |
|
we've only played there twice since then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [63]
TigerPulse: 24%
7
|
Re: Football Update: ESPN Prediction on Clemson-SC
Nov 25, 2013, 4:22 PM
|
|
He said hasn't won in Columbia. 34-17 was in Clemson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [369]
TigerPulse: 96%
16
|
Who cares what he thinks.
Nov 25, 2013, 4:29 PM
|
|
He thinks Georgia is going to score 51 on Tech with a backup QB...right. Those predictions he made look very suspect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3350]
TigerPulse: 97%
34
|
I love it when we are doubted. I have good vibe now***
Nov 25, 2013, 4:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14935]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 12319
Joined: 2006
|
Sat Night comes down to two players: Clowney
Nov 25, 2013, 4:36 PM
|
|
and Davis.
We all know Clowney isn't going to half-### this one like he has all season and Davis is a baller (not as good as his brother but a baller).
Shut both of them down, Tigers cruise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [305]
TigerPulse: 100%
15
|
3 players Shaw, Davis and Clowney
Nov 25, 2013, 7:38 PM
|
|
And on our side Tajh Boyd. If he's hot we could have a very good night...if not....not so good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2184]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Whatever.Clemson is better. Play like it, blowout ensues.***
Nov 25, 2013, 4:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [78262]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 120116
Joined: 1998
|
Re: Football Update: ESPN Prediction on Clemson-SC
Nov 25, 2013, 4:49 PM
|
|
an angry man still butt-hurt over the beating we gave his bulldogs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21024]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 17418
Joined: 2008
|
Nice - a shot at Dabo with hatred for Clemson dripping out
Nov 25, 2013, 4:50 PM
|
|
of his prediction. He sux. He sux BIG TIME!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5417]
TigerPulse: 88%
38
|
I'd say this prediction
Nov 25, 2013, 5:55 PM
|
|
Is pretty accurate. Don't any of you think for a second that Shaw and other players won't play the game of their worthless lives vs Clemson. They have been doing it the past 4 years and I can't see that changing, honestly. I have serious concerns about this game and our ability to be able to move the ball. I think some of you should really prepare yourselves for a loss here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12507]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
Posts: 12664
Joined: 2003
|
looks like a little more locker room material to me.***
Nov 25, 2013, 6:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24210]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 24532
Joined: 2003
|
How could anyone be mad about this article?
Nov 25, 2013, 6:10 PM
|
|
It seems pretty dang fair to me. I hope he is wrong, but its far from crazy to have his perspective.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21024]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 17418
Joined: 2008
|
I'd be mad at least 5 out of 10 times reading it.***
Nov 25, 2013, 7:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1898]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Yep - Last Year in the Valley
Nov 26, 2013, 12:04 AM
[ in reply to How could anyone be mad about this article? ] |
|
we had Tajh, Ellington, Nuk,& Watkins - Coots were without Shaw and Lattimore -- in our house!! With the writers - history counts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62760]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62783
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Football Update: ESPN Prediction on Clemson-SC
Nov 25, 2013, 9:12 PM
|
|
And Slurrier may say, I had a few beers before the game, who won!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2394]
TigerPulse: 83%
32
|
Wow! A shocker! In further news, water is wet!***
Nov 25, 2013, 9:15 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virtuoso [656]
TigerPulse: 95%
21
|
I stopped reading at "Mark Schlabach gives his insight"***
Nov 25, 2013, 11:57 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 37
| visibility 870
|
|
|
50
