Replies: 25
| visibility 210
|
Clemson Sports Icon [59350]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 45093
Joined: 2003
|
Did y'all see the graphic the announcers put up late during
5
5
Mar 4, 2023, 10:33 PM
|
|
the game of Joe Lunardi's 4 teams that he has definitely in OVER Clemson. The Quad 1 wins by Clemson dwarfed the other 4.....Not even close.
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1538]
TigerPulse: 69%
30
|
So it’s a conspiracy against Clemson?
1
9
9
Mar 4, 2023, 10:42 PM
|
|
Sounds like a right wing narrative.
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [24894]
TigerPulse: 94%
54
Posts: 17252
Joined: 2002
|
Marlborocountycoot = fromdapeedeeswamp = blue sky dog
4
Mar 4, 2023, 11:05 PM
|
|
.
|
|
|
|
 |
Heisman Winner [79993]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 29572
Joined: 2018
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Clemson Legend [102418]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 98934
Joined: 2009
|
Who doesn't?***
1
Mar 4, 2023, 11:25 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Immortal [62799]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62816
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Enjoys his own farts.^^^***
1
Mar 4, 2023, 11:58 PM
[ in reply to Enjoys his own farts.^^^*** ] |
|
They enjoy anybody's farts, other people's more than his own!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Immortal [62799]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62816
Joined: 2007
|
Re: So it’s a conspiracy against Clemson?
1
Mar 4, 2023, 11:55 PM
[ in reply to So it’s a conspiracy against Clemson? ] |
|
And this sounds like a Klucker that equals a chit p e c k e r, you know what I'm talking about right, a yard bird that is always seen pecking the white part out of chicken chit!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [44537]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 11683
Joined: 2015
|
Re: So it’s a conspiracy against Clemson?
3
Mar 5, 2023, 7:20 AM
[ in reply to So it’s a conspiracy against Clemson? ] |
|
Yea about like the other one they were ridiculed about on the Covid origins.
Everything is a conspiracy until it’s not and if it doesn’t fit the narrative.
Pfizer CEO says hello and thank you!
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1801]
TigerPulse: 88%
31
|
Re: So it’s a conspiracy against Clemson?
1
Mar 5, 2023, 9:18 AM
[ in reply to So it’s a conspiracy against Clemson? ] |
|
sounds like blue sky is a woke true believer who hails from Mississippi or Florida and severely misinformed
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Conqueror [11117]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 13633
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [18456]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 11978
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Did y'all see the graphic the announcers put up late during
2
Mar 4, 2023, 10:42 PM
|
|
Did you check that pesky quad 3 / 4 loss column?
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Conqueror [11399]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 13353
Joined: 2014
|
Apparently two quad four losses hurt us a lot more than 4
5
5
Mar 4, 2023, 11:07 PM
|
|
quad four wins help us!
|
|
|
|
 |
Heisman Winner [85987]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 38854
Joined: 2003
|
Evidently the NET multiplies games times the Quad rating.
2
Mar 5, 2023, 7:35 AM
|
|
1 Quad 1 win x 1 still equals 1 win.
1 Quad 4 loss x 4 equals FOUR losses.
I hate the NET, it has no provision for the relative importance of conference games, rivalry games, injured players, improvement over time, none of the factors that HUMANS would deem important when evaluating teams.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [18456]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 11978
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Evidently the NET multiplies games times the Quad rating.
1
Mar 5, 2023, 7:58 AM
|
|
But,it’s not just the NET though.
https://masseyratings.com/cb/compare.htm
None of the metrics like us because they all agree USuCk, Loyola-C, and Louisville are terrible teams. Losing to bad teams hurts no matter what system you employ. There are over 5000 games played. How are you gonna rate each one by additional metrics like the ones you’re talking about. But the committee does weigh those things after reviewing the NET, RPI, Sagarin, etc. The NET is actually less important for its index score than the quad 3/4 losses and quad 1 wins. These are used as tie breakers among the 16 or so contenders for the last 8 or so slots. Which is why in 4 years lower ranked net teams have gotten in than ever got in with equivalent rank in RPI, because to date they’ve rejected anyone with more than 1 quad 4 loss.
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1801]
TigerPulse: 88%
31
|
Re: Evidently the NET multiplies games times the Quad rating.
1
Mar 5, 2023, 9:30 AM
|
|
far too much credit for strength of schedule in an effort to encourage scheduling stronger teams. Rewarding a team for simply stepping on the court with another only to be beaten-Virtue scheduling
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Elite [5147]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: Did y'all see the graphic the announcers put up late during
2
Mar 4, 2023, 11:55 PM
|
|
|
the game of Joe Lunardi's 4 teams that he has definitely in OVER Clemson. The Quad 1 wins by Clemson dwarfed the other 4.....Not even close.
Here is the picture I took of the graphic .
|
|
|
|
 |
Tiger Titan [50729]
TigerPulse: 79%
58
Posts: 37006
Joined: 2003
|
That would be ridiculous for any of those four to get in over us.
3
Mar 5, 2023, 12:00 AM
|
|
Here’s hoping the committee uses logic and common sense. If they do, we are easily in.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1501]
TigerPulse: 76%
30
|
The NET and Ken Pom aren't "the committee"
1
1
Mar 5, 2023, 12:20 AM
|
|
What does their 'logic and common sense" say? Oh, wait..
|
|
|
|
 |
Heisman Winner [80098]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 20672
Joined: 2008
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Tiger [33817]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 14285
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Did y'all see the graphic the announcers put up late during
1
Mar 5, 2023, 9:28 AM
[ in reply to Re: Did y'all see the graphic the announcers put up late during ] |
|
Are the other teams getting more consideration based on reputation? Have they made the tournament more than us over the last 5-10 years? I’m not saying this is right at all, but we know that happens, just like with OK and Ohio St in football. And I honestly don’t know the answer to this and am frankly too lazy to research it.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Immortal [67123]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 24738
Joined: 2011
|
Re: Did y'all see the graphic the announcers put up late during
2
Mar 4, 2023, 11:59 PM
|
|
Hopefully, he will be proven wrong. That's ridiculous!
|
|
|
|
 |
Head Coach [903]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Re: Did y'all see the graphic the announcers put up late during
1
Mar 5, 2023, 7:16 AM
|
|
I must have looked at it wrong. What I saw was 2 of them had 6 versus our 4. But our conference and overall records are better. I think those 2 were WVU and Wisconsin. Forget the other 2.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22558]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
|
The compelling point that was made about that graphic was
3
Mar 5, 2023, 7:19 AM
|
|
Three of Clemson's Quad 1 wins were on the road. I don't believe the others could touch that. Surprised me.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [18456]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 11978
Joined: 2007
|
Re: The compelling point that was made about that graphic was
1
Mar 5, 2023, 9:16 AM
|
|
It’s redundant. Quads are adjusted for home/away/neutral. Quad 1 is quad 1.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22558]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
|
I can't help you with comprehension...
1
Mar 5, 2023, 9:29 AM
|
|
So I expressed ONLY the difference across the four that were in the graphic. You do with it what you choose...clearly I can't stand with your personal MENSA status.
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7167]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
Posts: 10840
Joined: 2003
|
Re: Did y'all see the graphic the announcers put up late during
1
Mar 5, 2023, 7:41 AM
|
|
That is what happens when we lose to terrible teams.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 25
| visibility 210
|
|
|