Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
CU DB impeded receiver's path - that was the reason
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic
Replies: 10
| visibility 923

CU DB impeded receiver's path - that was the reason

3
1

Nov 1, 2025, 4:13 PM
Reply

We would have wanted the same call.

But, CU dropped at least one pick six.. blew coverages.. no way that game came down to one questionable call.

I never understood what Dabo saw in Tom Allen.. seems things were better with Porkchop.. certainly not worse.

flag link
military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

False. A receiver is not entitled to run through a defensive back

8

Nov 1, 2025, 4:14 PM
Reply

To get to the football

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: False. A receiver is not entitled to run through a defensive back

1

Nov 1, 2025, 4:17 PM
Reply

And the pass was like 20 yds away from the receiver.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The FACT THATVTHE REFS followed this uo with an imaginary OPI


Nov 1, 2025, 4:20 PM
Reply

On us proves it was bogus.

2025 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: CU DB impeded receiver's path - that was the reason

1

Nov 1, 2025, 4:17 PM
Reply

Correct. Maybe defensive holding instead of pi, but still.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: CU DB impeded receiver's path - that was the reason

1

Nov 1, 2025, 4:19 PM
Reply

Holding might have occurred earlier, but that wasn't the call or when the flag was thrown. It was clearly OPI, though.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: CU DB impeded receiver's path - that was the reason


Nov 1, 2025, 4:28 PM
Reply

That is the most mentally handicapped remark I have ever read concerning a football play

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

AT was turning around towards the ball when the WR hit him, OF PI***


Nov 1, 2025, 4:43 PM
Reply



tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'm going to disagree.

1

Nov 1, 2025, 10:11 PM
Reply

During a legal forward pass (loose ball play), all eligible A players (by number and position) may catch the pass/loose ball in flight, untouched by B, and ALL B players are eligible to catch the pass in flight. Being both receiver (A) and defender (B) have equal rights, either player is entitled to whatever spot on the field they can get to first without contact. Pass interference restrictions for A begin with the snap and for B when the pass leaves the passers hand. From my initial review of the play, it looks like B has position and then A changes direction, engages B (DB) and is blocking B (DB) because B already had position. That sure looked like OPI to me.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I'm going to disagree.


Nov 1, 2025, 10:13 PM
Reply

It was a terrible call but we should still should have won the game if we simply stopped the two point play.

2025 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I'm going to disagree.

1

Nov 1, 2025, 10:18 PM
Reply

2 point play doesn't happen without a touchdown. Should have been Clemson ball.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 10
| visibility 923
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic