Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
BCS RANKINGS, i just dont understand.....
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 42
| visibility 1

BCS RANKINGS, i just dont understand.....


Nov 11, 2013, 9:33 AM

Im sorry but i just dont get it. These BCS rankings and the bias opnion towards the SEC. There is no concept to these ranking. I dont care what the score is, when your only loss is to a team that could beat anyone including A-LA-BAMA, I dont think you should be falling in the rankings while teams that have lost to UNRANKED teams move up. Someone please explain this BCS BS propaganda to me, because I honestly think college football hates Clemson and wants to give us no credit. Why is it mandatory that Clemson MUST win EVERY SINGLE GAME in order for anyone to give us props ...(including half of our fans....sad)

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: BCS RANKINGS, i just dont understand.....


Nov 11, 2013, 9:34 AM

Bring on the playoffs. Expand it to the top 16 teams with a selection committee and we can end this ridiculousness.

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

the 4 team playoff will always be


Nov 11, 2013, 9:36 AM

2 SEC teams and 2 others. every yr since most SEC teams dont play jack out of conference.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2005_majors_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-xtiger.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Well, if they start losing in that 4-team playoff then it


Nov 11, 2013, 9:56 AM

will stop being 2-SEC teams.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2011_pickem_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-soccerkrzy.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Cole @ Beach Cole w/ Clemson Hat


Wouldn't be this year, at this poinst anyway.***


Nov 11, 2013, 10:34 AM [ in reply to the 4 team playoff will always be ]



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-jospehg.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


seasons not over yet***


Nov 12, 2013, 1:02 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: BCS RANKINGS, i just dont understand.....


Nov 11, 2013, 9:38 AM [ in reply to Re: BCS RANKINGS, i just dont understand..... ]

If that's the case, then the SEC would have a total of one 1....mabye 2 teams in the playoffs. And I think it will finally expose the SE(BAMA)C for what it really is.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: BCS RANKINGS, i just dont understand.....


Nov 11, 2013, 10:48 AM [ in reply to Re: BCS RANKINGS, i just dont understand..... ]

You're right 4 Team Playoff system won't work either. ESECPN will keep these SEC teams ranked up there it needs to be at least 16 teams. There should be no preseason rankings. Alabama shouldn't just get to sit on the throne until someone knocks them off. The BCS is ridiculous and ESPN doesn't even try to hide their bias anymore. ACC and other conferences have to have PERFECT seasons to even be CONSIDERED for NCG while the SEC teams with 2 & 3 losses remain in top 25. It is ludicrous that SCAR is ranked #10. The BCS is a JOKE. Goooo Tigers! Fight like hell ###### and WIN!!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: BCS RANKINGS, i just dont understand.....


Nov 11, 2013, 9:34 AM

Georgia falling in the rankings is hurting... + the Jeff Sagarin poll which, for whatever reason, always has us 5 spots lower than every poll in America. Dont worry about it, we win in Columbia, we go to a big game. That is all we have control over.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: BCS RANKINGS, i just dont understand.....


Nov 11, 2013, 9:40 AM

I agree with you. We win our games, and the rest takes care of itself. believe the prediction I saw on here that we are in the Orange Bowl assumes we bet usuc this year. That is a good assumption. I think we finally are hungry again.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: BCS RANKINGS, i just dont understand.....


Nov 11, 2013, 9:47 AM

If i were a senior on that team..(besides the ones that are obviously first round picks....whick could possibly be 3 people this year), I would be past the point of hungry, wanting to push my body as far as i could. I want to see the tigers that I saw the opening against Georgia when all of my cloest 80,000+ friends were there. Come on I know you all saw it too. Im a tiger through and through but we have just seemed slumped after the BC game..not the FSU game.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: BCS RANKINGS, i just dont understand.....


Nov 11, 2013, 9:53 AM

But guess what guys, you have no reason to be upset or slumped. go out and blow everyone out of the water like you know you can do. One of the most prolific offenses, and by far one of the best pass rush d's in the nation. People should give Clemson nothing but credit. Alomst of the likes of LSU, you dont hear anyone talking smack about them, and theyve lost what 3 games, and not even ranked in the top 15. And I think we are better than Stanford haha just saying...

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The top & bottom computer ranking is dropped in the


Nov 11, 2013, 10:19 AM [ in reply to Re: BCS RANKINGS, i just dont understand..... ]

calculation.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2011_pickem_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-soccerkrzy.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Cole @ Beach Cole w/ Clemson Hat


Sagarin Ratings don't really affect us since each team's


Nov 11, 2013, 10:50 AM [ in reply to Re: BCS RANKINGS, i just dont understand..... ]

highest and lowest computer rating are dropped. The 5 middle ratings for each team are averaged for a final Average CPU Rating.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: BCS RANKINGS, i just dont understand.....


Nov 11, 2013, 9:35 AM

... And welcome to TigerNet. :)

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Auburn beat A&M so they have a better win than we do.


Nov 11, 2013, 9:38 AM

It's a virtual tie and doesn't really matter. It's the computers that are hurting us, not the people.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Everyone seems to think a four team


Nov 11, 2013, 9:42 AM

playoff will change the bias. I think that's funny. Ohio Staye has beat no one. If there were a four team playoff today..... The voters would put in 4 sec teams

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

We do Chicken right...it's not just for frying anymore!


Re: Everyone seems to think a four team- if that happened


Nov 11, 2013, 9:50 AM

you can be Ohio State would get the system changed though

badge-donor-05yr.jpgringofhonor-74tiger.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Everyone seems to think a four team- if that happened


Nov 11, 2013, 9:53 AM

yea urban would not have that

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

That's why we need 8 main conferences and an 8 team


Nov 11, 2013, 9:52 AM [ in reply to Everyone seems to think a four team ]

playoff. With 8 main conferences, we could fit anywhere between 96-128 teams (12 to 16 teams per conference). Winner of each conference goes to the playoffs. The four BCS bowls are the first round. The 4 winners each play a game and those winners are in the NCG. It would add exactly one week of football (2 huge semi-finals). You don't win your conference, you don't play. I don't understand what's so hard about that.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: That's why we need 8 main conferences and an 8 team


Nov 11, 2013, 9:55 AM

I like that...maybe possibly cutting out all the other bowls too??

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Well, no - you can't do that. But we could cut some...


Nov 11, 2013, 9:59 AM

In no way do I think a 6-6 team should be going to a bowl. And when they're playing in Boise, Idaho in front of 3200 people, that just doesn't make sense. At that point, you're just exploiting kids for the sake of some tv money. The players like it (I guess?) - but beyond some late night TV filler, I don't understand the logic.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: That's why we need 8 main conferences and an 8 team


Nov 11, 2013, 9:59 AM [ in reply to Re: That's why we need 8 main conferences and an 8 team ]

Do you honestly believe that Bowl games will be reduced!!!! I think $$$$$$ not!!!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: That's why we need 8 main conferences and an 8 team


Nov 11, 2013, 10:05 AM

Do i believe? No. Do i think it needs to happen? yes.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: That's why we need 8 main conferences and an 8 team


Nov 11, 2013, 10:18 AM

Doing away with all the Bowl games would be the wrong thing to do. Not only does it generate revenue for the teams and conference but, more importantly, it allows the competing teams to have an extra 12 days of practice. Clemson uses this extra practice just as it would an extra spring practice and works primarily with the young guys who will play a bigger role the next season. Teams such as Clemson who always get a bowl invite somewhere truly benefit from the bowl experience.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Why?


Nov 11, 2013, 10:46 AM [ in reply to Re: That's why we need 8 main conferences and an 8 team ]

What possible harm is more football over the holidays?

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


A huge bonus to my idea: only 1 SEC team in


Nov 11, 2013, 10:01 AM [ in reply to Re: That's why we need 8 main conferences and an 8 team ]

Sure, they'll 3itch and moan, and you'll hear about how it's impossible to beat Alabama and reach the playoffs, but even if another team got in, sooner or later they'd have to face Bama. You don't like it? Get better.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: A huge bonus to my idea: only 1 SEC team in


Nov 11, 2013, 10:07 AM

Yep, and that goes back to my comment about it finally exposing the Coat Tail Conference for what is truly is.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It's a special unbiased committee, and no, they won't


Nov 11, 2013, 10:20 AM [ in reply to Everyone seems to think a four team ]

put in 4-SEC teams. It would be similar to how this year is. Right now the committee would probably put Alabama, FSU, Ohio State, and Baylor/Stanford. Woah, only 1-SEC team!

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2011_pickem_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-soccerkrzy.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Cole @ Beach Cole w/ Clemson Hat


A Conference Championship will be a qualifying card ...


Nov 11, 2013, 10:25 AM

with the committee.

Next criteria will be quality out of conference wins.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I hope so.***


Nov 12, 2013, 1:04 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yep


Nov 11, 2013, 11:21 AM [ in reply to It's a special unbiased committee, and no, they won't ]

And should Baylor win out it would DEFINITELY be Bama, FSU, OHST, Baylor.

They are not going to leave out an undefeated AQ conference team in favor of a team with a loss.

It gets murkier when there are a lot of 1 loss teams and not so many undefeated teams, but this year would be simple (so far).

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


they also haven't lost to anyone


Nov 12, 2013, 1:03 PM [ in reply to Everyone seems to think a four team ]

in 2 seasons

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Nice tongue in cheek:"college football hates clemson'


Nov 11, 2013, 10:32 AM

I hope.

We were one of the darlings of ESPN until 51-14, now we're not, nor should we be.

Auburn has gotten better each week. They beat A&M on the road, a better win than any of ours.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-jospehg.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


If we're not in the running for 1 or 2 this year, then it


Nov 11, 2013, 10:34 AM

doesn't matter. Bottom line is...win and improve. AU still has Georgia and Bama. We still play the coots. OSU can still lose, Stanford can still lose. Had we narrowly lost to FSU instead of getting destroyed, I think we'd be higher. But we got our butts whipped and we're ranked where we should be IMO.

Our quality win is against UGA, who has been decimated by injuries. If we win out, we'll have a very good BCS ranking and will get a BCS game, which is all we can hope for at this point.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"IDIOT POSTER OF THE MONTH SO FAR...GWP-- You have won IPM Award for your failure to completely comprehend a clear post & then choose to attack someone who points out your ignorance. While you are not yet in the same No Class Catagory as deRoberts, ClemTiger117 & Tigerdug23, you are getting closer to the Sewer Dwellers." - coachmac


Re: BCS RANKINGS, i just dont understand.....


Nov 11, 2013, 10:45 AM

Hardest thing to swallow is watching The chickens climb after losing to a TERRIBLE Tenn team and a falling UGA team. If Clemson would had lost those same two games they would not be anywhere in the top 25. INSANITY!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

they beat # 5 at # 5's house***


Nov 12, 2013, 12:56 PM



military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Fiat Justitia et Pereat Mundus


Re: they beat # 5 at # 5's house***


Nov 12, 2013, 2:41 PM

So Carolina is the only team in AMERICA with 2 wins

ON THE ROAD

over teams in the BCS Top 20

THE ONLY TEAM !!!!!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Put your tin foil hat back on


Nov 11, 2013, 2:46 PM

And think about it for a while..... You'll see I'm right

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

We do Chicken right...it's not just for frying anymore!


Theyre not meant to be understood...theyre biased***


Nov 12, 2013, 2:15 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It's a couple of human polls and some computers.


Nov 12, 2013, 2:37 PM

The computers are the reason why we are behind Auburn right now. Do you really think some computer models are biased?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: It's a couple of human polls and some computers.


Nov 12, 2013, 2:46 PM

It is all a conspiracy to keep a little college in upstate South Carolina. They spend weeks and weeks and months trying to engineer system who soles purpose is to keep Clemson down.

Deep in a cave in the NCAa headquarters, the evil Dr. Nofootball is hard at work devising a system guarenteed to help the SEC and hurt Clemson......nothing else matters

If you got to Area 51 look behind the grassy knoll, past the big stone thingies, you will see guy with a FreeMason symbol, give him the secret password and he will tell you how he manipulates 7 computers and 120 voters to make sure it is Bama, TAM, LSU and USC in the final four.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: It's a couple of human polls and some computers.


Nov 12, 2013, 2:48 PM

It is all a conspiracy to keep a little college in upstate South Carolina down. They spend weeks and weeks and months trying to engineer a perfect system whose sole purpose is to keep Clemson down.

Deep in a cave in the NCAa headquarters, the evil Dr. Nofootball is hard at work devising a system guaranteed to help the SEC and hurt Clemson......nothing else matters

If you got to Area 51 look behind the grassy knoll, past the big stone thingies, you will see a guy with a Free Mason symbol, give him the secret password and he will tell you how he manipulates 7 computers and 120 voters to make sure it is Bama, TAM, LSU and USC in the final four.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 42
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic