|
Replies: 8
| visibility 766
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [101133]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 48687
Joined: 2009
|
Again..DW4 is a more complete FB player than Bama's Henry &
Dec 2, 2015, 8:52 AM
|
|
Is More important to his team than Henry is, and makes many more decisions than Henry does that makes a win possible ( or not), Etc.
Saying, Henry should not be a shoo-in for the
Heisman!
Hoping something happens Saturday night that will prove it.
GoTiGS...#1 BABY! ??
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2109]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Agree. But given the results in 2009, when CJ was
Dec 2, 2015, 9:03 AM
|
|
the best player in college football and brought so much more to the table than Ingram, I'm not holding my breath. I haven't had a lot of respect for the Heisman since.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18213]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 22450
Joined: 1999
|
BTW, have you voted for DW4 yet today?
Dec 2, 2015, 9:05 AM
|
|
I did a few minutes ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1060]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
If you objectively watch Henry in games
Dec 2, 2015, 9:10 AM
|
|
you will conclude that their O line is the Heisman candidate. Henry is not a special runner. He is big and is 3 to 5 yards down the field before anyone touches him. Then because he is so big he gets one or two more while he is being tackled. I don't see great vision or cuts and he never makes anyone miss. He is just straight down hill and big.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [123]
TigerPulse: 56%
11
|
Re: If you objectively watch Henry in games
Dec 2, 2015, 9:13 AM
|
|
Yeah breaking like 5 tackles on way to TD is all his O-like..thatd be like saying gallman isnt any good and its all our oline. We saw how bad our rushing was without gallman in there..Henry is going to be tough to bring down if we play them
Personally I think the Stanford guy should win.he is basically doing everything for them the way spiller did for us that year
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14589]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 23663
Joined: 2004
|
Henry is like 235 and frequently doesn't get hit until he's
Dec 2, 2015, 10:00 AM
|
|
at the 2nd level. I'm not gonna say it's ALL his OL and he doesn't deserve any credit at all, but a lot of his broken tackles are against DBs where he has a significant size and weight advantage. He's a good back, not a great back, and he won't be anything special at the next level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Time Great [88593]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 81636
Joined: 1999
|
Are you saying only QBs should win the Heisman?***
Dec 2, 2015, 9:15 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11399]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 13353
Joined: 2014
|
Only when the QB is the best player, as DW is this year!***
Dec 2, 2015, 9:18 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [86021]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 38862
Joined: 2003
|
Henry may win the Heisman, but he will be a bust in the NFL.
Dec 2, 2015, 9:57 AM
|
|
He is big and slow, but will NOT be bigger than the linebackers hitting him at the next level. Ask Trent Richardson, another supposedly great back from Bama.
He will win the award though, because not only SEC, but BAMA. HAS to be the best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 8
| visibility 766
|
|
|
50
