Replies: 15
| visibility 1
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11179
Joined: 11/30/95
|
Swinney: Branch back to defensive end
Oct 24, 2010, 9:32 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [32]
TigerPulse: 26%
Posts: 74
Joined: 10/15/99
|
Re: Swinney: Branch back to defensive end
Oct 24, 2010, 10:18 PM
|
|
If by "playing smarter" it includes snapping the ball way too early on almost every one of our last drive's plays, i am scratching my head.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1203]
TigerPulse: 91%
Posts: 2251
Joined: 8/2/02
|
Re: Swinney: Branch back to defensive end
Oct 24, 2010, 10:40 PM
|
|
you'd be better off pulling your head out of your ### first.
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [54]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
LMBO!!!!***
Oct 25, 2010, 12:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addict [422]
TigerPulse: 76%
Posts: 920
Joined: 9/27/08
|
You dont snap it at 1 or 2 seconds like on xbox
Oct 24, 2010, 11:42 PM
[ in reply to Re: Swinney: Branch back to defensive end ] |
|
three reasons why. 1) no room for error. If the QB gets off in his cadence, he cant yell snap it now ######, or just hit the A button...then you end up with a delay of game 2) You dont want the defense to know EXACTLY when the ball will be snapped...you want them guessing a little it is the only advantage Olinemen have 3) Statistically speaking, offensive off sides and illegal motion penalties increase 450% in the last 5 seconds of the play clock as players get anxious
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3121]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 5113
Joined: 9/2/05
|
Exactly correct. That last drive was run perfectly...
Oct 25, 2010, 9:37 AM
|
|
except for the part where we didn't get a TD. But at that juncture of the game, we didn't need a TD, so I stand by the fact that the last drive was EXACTLY what we needed and executed PERFECTLY.
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [75]
TigerPulse: 74%
Posts: 94
Joined: 12/25/06
|
Not perfectly...
Oct 25, 2010, 12:18 PM
|
|
Of course 6 would have been better, but also Brown needs to know to stay in bounds on that sweep. We ran that WR fake about 6 times during that drive and I had a feeling we were setting that up. I believe there was a TO the play before so he should have been told stay in bounds. It doesn't change the result but would eaten another 30 seconds off the clock in a tighter situation. Good game overall!
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5436]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 11913
Joined: 9/23/01
|
Re: Swinney: Branch back to defensive end
Oct 25, 2010, 8:42 AM
[ in reply to Re: Swinney: Branch back to defensive end ] |
|
Oh boy that smell is getting strong ????
Can you smell it ??? Smells just like chicken shyatt
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [54]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Let's don't fix it if it ain't broke
Oct 24, 2010, 10:23 PM
|
|
geeezee!!
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6577]
TigerPulse: 79%
Posts: 5733
Joined: 12/31/06
|
he doesn't belong at LB.***
Oct 24, 2010, 10:28 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4640]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 9549
Joined: 11/4/01
|
Too slow for LB. Johnson called for iso's that almost
Oct 25, 2010, 9:02 AM
[ in reply to Let's don't fix it if it ain't broke ] |
|
got him burned on passes. He interfered on one and was beat by a RB on at least two others.
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24997]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42860
Joined: 7/31/10
|
Re: Too slow for LB. Johnson called for iso's that almost
Oct 25, 2010, 12:14 PM
|
|
How about middle LB? I agree that he shouldn't be chasing backs in the flats, but taking on guards in the middle might be more to his size, speed and skill set. Not as much chasing but more standing your ground.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4947]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6982
Joined: 10/12/06
|
Re: Too slow for LB. Johnson called for iso's that almost
Oct 25, 2010, 12:41 PM
|
|
Way too much to learn to train a MLB now. The MLB has to be the QB of the defense and you can't just pick that up in a weeks worth of practice.
As far as Meeks goes I am really glad to see him stepping up. Hall has played well the last two season and it looks like Meeks is stepping up just in time for McDaniels exit. Perfect transistion for next season.
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [10]
TigerPulse: null%
Posts: 8
Joined: 9/19/09
|
Re: Swinney: Branch back to defensive end
Oct 25, 2010, 8:01 AM
|
|
What is up with Hall?
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3292]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6515
Joined: 1/13/04
|
Re: Swinney: Branch back to defensive end
Oct 25, 2010, 9:05 AM
|
|
Hall is fine. Meeks is just playing better than him right now. Competition is a good thing. Makes everyone strive to get better.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1746]
TigerPulse: 66%
Posts: 3438
Joined: 2/7/07
|
Tough break for Daniel Andrews. Best wishes to him.
***
Oct 25, 2010, 12:15 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 1
|
|
|