Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Negative Recruiting?
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 8
| visibility 1,619

Negative Recruiting?


Jul 5, 2008, 10:56 AM

Why do South Carolina fans think Clemson (or any major football program in the country for that matter) has to negative recruit against them? Do they not see that all anyone has to do is present the facts. To put it mildly, South Carolina has a losing all-time record against all of their "rivals": Clemson, Georgia, Florida, and Tennessee. Is that negative recruiting or is that a fact? South Carolina averages more arrests, suspensions, and expulsions than all of those schools too. Is that negative recruiting or is that a fact? South Carolina's football facilities don't measure up against any of their chief "rivals" and their football stadium is a giant dumpster located inside of a landfill? OK, that may be negative recruiting but is it really that far off? Nah that's a fact too! When it comes to South Carolina, I want someone (anyone) to tell me what is negative recruiting? Anyone else sees the irony in a fan-base that pulls for one of college football's all-time losers and wallows in rumors, conjecture, innuendo and conspiracy theories complaining about someone negative recruiting against them?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

This is all we need when recruiting against SC.


Jul 5, 2008, 12:13 PM

This Is South Carolina Football (we need to update this)


Following the 2003 season South Carolina has an all-time winning percentage under .500 (494-502-44), which ranks 88th all-time in D-1A football...only 29 programs have been worse. A few of the notable football programs who have been better than the Gamecocks include such powerhouses as: Duke, Western Michigan, Toledo, Navy, UAB, Central Florida, Ball St., North Texas, Nevada, East Carolina, Houston, Northern Illinois, Utah St., San Jose St., Vanderbilt, Akron, Baylor, UNLV, Kansas, and Rutgers just to name a few. This is Carolina Gamecock football.
In the 59 seasons Carolina has been affiliated with a conference, they have won that conference once...the ACC in 1969, with a 7-4 record. Since the Associated Press began ranking football teams in 1936, the ##### have finished in the Top 20 of the rankings only five times in the 67 years. Carolina has never finished in the Top 10 of a major recognized poll...NEVER. The first year of Gamecock football was in 1892, Carolina won its first bowl game 103 years later under BRAD SCOTT. In 109 seasons of football, Carolina has yet to participate in one of the ?Big 5? Bowls (Rose, Sugar, Orange, Fiesta, Cotton). Guess what? As Carolina is set to begin its 110th season of collegiate football, they have won 10 or more games in a single season once. In 110 seasons, Carolina has won more games than it lost only 50 times. In 110 seasons, Carolina has won 6 or more games in a season 33 times, and lost 6 or more 35 times. This is Carolina Gamecock football.

South Carolina has had 32 different head coaches in its storied tradition...only five of them stayed longer than 5 seasons, 21 of them have losing records. Add to that the winning tradition the ##### have enjoyed at home in Williams-Brice Stadium. Carolina is 18-36-1 at home in conference since joining the SEC. Lou Holtz is the devil. It?s another Carolina Touchdown!??not quite. Of the 56 programs, which have played more than 1000 games all-time, only four have scored fewer points than South Carolina in their schools history.

Since joining the SEC in 1992, Carolina has had a winning record in the conference twice. In the eleven seasons as a member of the SEC, Carolina boasts a conference record of 33-62-1?only two teams have been worse: Kentucky has 26 wins, Vanderbilt 11. Although Carolina has yet to finish in the top two of the Eastern division, they have finished last twice. Carolina has yet to win six conference games in a season, something only Kentucky and Vanderbilt have done in the last 11 seasons. And no one should forget the fact that Carolina went two consecutive seasons without winning one conference game, not one. Carolina had an impressive string of 21 consecutive games with a loss snapped in 2000 by beating New Mexico State (then let the rest of the country know what Carolina football was all about by tearing down the goal-posts). Since 1992, only three times has any non-probation member of the conference failed to win two or more games overall in a season?South Carolina has accomplished this feat twice, Kentucky once. Since 1992, only once has a conference member failed to win a game overall in a single season?you guessed it, South Carolina.
South Carolina?s all-time record versus other current conference members is even more impressive: 2-9 vs Alabama, 4-8 vs Arkansas, 1-4-1 vs Auburn, 3-18-3 vs Florida, 13-41-2 vs Georgia, 8-6-1 vs Kentucky, 2-14-1 vs LSU, 5-7 vs Ole Miss, 5-6 vs Mississippi St., 2-18-2 vs Tennessee, and 11-2 vs Vanderbilt. That?s correct, Carolina leads the all-time series against 2 SEC teams...Kentucky and Vanderbilt. This is Carolina Gamecock football.

But, the comparison of only 12 seasons in one conference does no justice to the tradition of South Carolina football. So lets compare the ##### record versus D-1A schools they have played 20 or more times: 36-61-4 vs Clemson, 17-24-3 vs Duke, 3-18-3 vs Florida, 13-41-2 vs Georgia, 9-12 vs Georgia Tech,11-17 vs Maryland, 16-34-4 vs North Carolina, 25-26-4 vs North Carolina State, 2-18-2 vs Tennessee, 21-12-1 vs Virginia, and 34-20-2 vs Wake Forest. William Brice is a crap hole. That?s correct, Carolina leads the all-time series against 2 of these 11 teams...Virginia and Wake Forest. This is Carolina Gamecock football.

Gamecock fans justify their horrible football record thru the strength of the SEC conference. But let?s look at the Gamecock?s record against the other big 4 conferences. South Carolina is 172-221-18 vs the ACC, 6-8 vs the Big 12, 22-26-5 vs the Big East, and 3-5 vs the Big Ten. This is Carolina Gamecock Football.

But all this tradition and past records are meaningless. What is more important is the recent history. Only losers live in the past. We are in the best years of Carolina Gamecock football, and the future has never been brighter...or has it? Carolina is coming off another losing season, the 9th in the last 13 seasons. Overall record since ?the legend? Lou Holtz became Head Coach: 27-32 (0.458) . Since 1995: 43-59-1. Since Joining the SEC: 60-75-1. Since 1990 South Carolina is 69-86-3. Carolina has finished in the Top 15 once in the past 15 seasons, and been to three bowl games in that span. This is Carolina Gamecock football.

2003 would be the year that Holtz previous recruiting seasons would begin to pay dividends. The team no longer had any ?cancers? and was again united. Team unity, young stars, and maturity at QB would get South Carolina back to a New Years Day Bowl game. Your most hated rival would be down and a Carolina victory at home on the seasons last game would likely lead to the departure of the rival coaching staff. The best High School Running Back to ever step on a field made a pledge in February to attend South Carolina, and bring glory to Columbia. That Running Back ended the season by leading the team with 58 yards per game rushing in his first season in Columbia?3 Freshmen Running Backs in the conference were better. Your QB who had matured, and finally had a grasp of the offense? He finished with the lowest completion percentage in the conference, as well as the fewest yards. Again, it was a sub .500 record overall, 2-6 in the conference, another 0-for against the Big 3 from the East. And the season finale that would send your in-state rival back to the drawing board and end the coaching career of Tommy Bowden instead ended in a 46-point home loss.

Seventeen of Twenty-two starters returned for 2004, and with it came high expectations. Returning was your entire offensive backfield. You brought in a new defensive coordinator who was going to implement a new scheme that would be a better fit for your young defensive talent. On offense, Lou took over play calling duties and was supposed take Carolina to the top by grinding it out on the ground. And when your Senior QB would be presented with the situation when he must throw, Coach Holtz said he was going to ?shock the conference?. The season began with a blowout win over Vanderbilt, and a 16-point lead midway through the second quarter over highly touted Georgia. But, then the reality of what the true description of South Carolina football is occurred, South Carolina wouldn?t score again until the South Florida game. When the season ended, this group of Gamecocks etched their name next to failures of the past. Once again South Carolina failed to reach the postseason. Once again, they ended conference play without a winning record. For the third season in a row they went 0-4 against the big three from the East and in state rival Clemson. The lopsided defeats in the 2004 contests against these four teams brought the total point differential margin to 191 points that Carolina has been outscored by in those four ?rivalry? games over the last three seasons. South Carolina has allowed 23 or more points in nine of those games, and scored 23 or more only once. The Quarterback who was going to ?shock the conference? didn?t make it to the third game of the season. Gamecock players gave Coach Holtz an early retirement gift during the final contest of the season in a 22-point loss to Clemson by delaying the game nearly ten minutes midway through the fourth quarter. The reason for the delay was frustrated South Carolina players started an ugly on-field altercation. The actions led to a postseason ban by the University. A team that had positioned itself to accomplish what only 11 teams before them had accomplished, instead took their place in Gamecock history as the 100th team that failed to reach postseason. Coach Holtz called the scene, his ?biggest disappointment.? For many it was just another chapter of ?This is South Carolina football.?

On November 23, 2004, South Carolina named Steve Spurrier as the schools Head Football Coach. Spurrier brings to South Carolina a .777 college winning percentage. His resume includes six SEC titles, one ACC title, and one national championship. Coach Spurrier holds the mark with the all-time highest winning percentage in SEC play. Spurrier will also bring to Columbia the highest expectations in the schools history. Spurrier finished in the Final AP Top 15 twelve consecutive seasons at Florida, so that is what we should expect at South Carolina. Spurrier had a career record of 11-1 against Georgia while at the Gator helm, so that is what we should expect at South Carolina. Gamecock players have greeted Coach Spurrier?s arrival in emblematic Carolina fashion with an abundance of team rules violations and felony arrests. In January, six players were charged after a total of $18,000 worth of computer and video equipment and framed photographs were taken from South Carolina's stadium in late November. The incident resulted in Offensive Lineman Woody Telfort being charged with a felony count of grand larceny, and numerous other charges against players. On March 1st leading rusher Demetris Summers was dismissed from the team. A day later, Tackle Kevin Mainord was arrested for stealing televisions from dorm rooms. Defensive End Moe Thompson was also arrested on similar charges six days later. On April 16th, two more Gamecock players, Josh Johnson and Ty Erving, were arrested and charged with simple marijuana possession. Less than two weeks later, WR David Smith pled guilty to third degree burglary. In late May, Linebacker Dustin Lindsey was charged with DUI. On June 23rd, Cory Boyd was dismissed from the team. In all, twelve players have been arrested in the 2005 calendar year. It?s been a typical Gamecock offseason. But, all will be suppressed in less than two months, when 111 years of South Carolina?s losing tradition will be changed. The man who will single handedly change the program has arrived in Columbia?sounds similar to what we were told before Holtz? arrival. When Spurrier accepted the job to lead the Gamecocks, he commented, ?they really haven?t ever done much here.? No kidding Steve, welcome to South Carolina football.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

If a recruit can't figure out that Columbia is...


Jul 5, 2008, 12:56 PM

a GIANT SHlTH0LE during his vist there, then he isn't smart enough to go to Clemson.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

What I don't understand is a kid like


Jul 5, 2008, 1:35 PM

Akdrick Fordham who commited to them last week saying "It looks like an exciting place to play. I am confident they will win the SEC." Where has he been? Is he not smart enough to see their history and where they are headed?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Is he not smart enough to see their history and where ...


Jul 5, 2008, 2:06 PM

... they are headed?"

Ding Ding Ding!

This is just the type of player they recruit!

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Gamecocks aren’t ready to take college football by storm just yet. They’re not even ready to compete in their own state – Clemson will still own the territory. Gamecocks fans would be smart to keep their heads buried until that time. Avoid talking trash to a much better Clemson program.” -Dustin Tackett


Re: What I don't understand is a kid like


Jul 5, 2008, 2:47 PM [ in reply to What I don't understand is a kid like ]

I don't think it reflects well on this board or Clemson when we start commenting on specific kids intelligence and why they might choose another school. They might change their mind and come to Clemson - then how smart does that make them all of a sudden ? But if they happen to read these comments about them , how does that make us look?

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Well, I wouldn't want to be judged by some things I said and


Jul 5, 2008, 4:24 PM [ in reply to What I don't understand is a kid like ]

actually believed when I was a lad of 17 or 18. :)

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: What I don't understand is a kid like


Jul 5, 2008, 6:55 PM [ in reply to What I don't understand is a kid like ]

I have a couple of guesses why he would say something like that:

1) The coot coaches did an amazing recruiting job impressing him and he believed every word of out of their mouth.

2) He's aware what he says will be in print for internet recruiting sites/message boards, newspapers, opposing schools/fans, all the other media. For whatever reason he commited to the coots, he knows that's the place he'll be for the next four years so he's going to put out the best positive spin no matter what the future may hold for him.

3) Perhaps what he said was suggested by the coaches recruiting him after he committed to them. They know what he says will be picked up by other recruits and perhaps we were not the intended audience of his statement.

4) He has the same learning disability Derek Watson, Moe Thompson, Demetrius Summers...etc etc. all the coot recruits have.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Here's what they tell the kids as far as negative recruiting


Jul 5, 2008, 1:37 PM

The coaches say, "South Carolina Football"

The kids say, "BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA".

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 8
| visibility 1,619
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic