|
Replies: 8
| visibility 1
|
110%er [6101]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 10117
Joined: 11/1/11
|
Schiff- “The whistleblower doesn’t need to testify”
Oct 14, 2019, 9:17 PM
|
|
“There doesn’t need to be a quid pro quo for impeachment”.
There is no whistleblower.
There is no quid pro quo.
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [15492]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18413
Joined: 12/10/14
|
Re: Schiff- “The whistleblower doesn’t need to testify”
Oct 14, 2019, 10:28 PM
|
|
“There doesn’t need to be a quid pro quo for impeachment”.
There is no whistleblower.
There is no quid pro quo.
And there's no basis for your conclusions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6101]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 10117
Joined: 11/1/11
|
Re: Schiff- “The whistleblower doesn’t need to testify”
Oct 15, 2019, 10:36 AM
|
|
I was a joke. More importantly, in the title, we have a whistleblower spy that suddenly doesn’t need to testify which means he won’t be cross examined. Now, that may seem just fine for people like yourself that don’t believe in the US Constitution, but there’s a whole lot of folks that aren’t going to allow the intelligence community to veto an American election through secret proceedings behind closed doors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [94339]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 95570
Joined: 12/25/09
|
If they had an impeachable charge Trump would...
Oct 14, 2019, 10:46 PM
|
|
be impeached. He isn't because they don't. This is exactly the same as Mueller coming out and saying he found no evidence that any US citizen conspired with Russia to fix the election. 'OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE,' was the cry. Ignoring that there wasn't a crime, Trump instructed everyone on his staff to cooperate fully, submitted 1.4 mil documents, responded to questions concerning the time before the election (1) and did absolutely nothing to impede or hamper the investigation.
Knowing that they had no grounds to force his testimony in an attempt to find a motive behind fake obstruction of justice they turned to asking for the grand jury testimonies knowing all along that it is unlawful to publish or share grand jury hearings.
All we heard for a couple days was 'Quid Pro Quo.' When the emotional left goes apechit over that Trump shoves it up their noses by releasing the transcript. It wouldn't surprise me if they scream 'OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE,' and site the release of the transcript as the obstructive act.
Again, we have a solid, iron clad case of obstruction of injustice.
1. I reckon the questions pertaining to the time after Trump took office assumed he has Stewie Griffin's time machine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [48078]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 49059
Joined: 5/16/04
|
Re: If they had an impeachable charge Trump would...
Oct 15, 2019, 8:33 AM
|
|
Its not likely because they dont have an impeachable charge in their minds, but rather they are worried about elections of those in Congress. They know it isn't getting past Senate too. It's a calculated gamble on what impact it will have for elections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22456]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 31338
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Of course politics is involved, but "ready-fire-aim" is no
Oct 15, 2019, 8:56 AM
|
|
way to go through life.
It would be stupid for Democrats to rush an impeachment charge from an impeachment trial tactical standpoint. While the potential charge is obvious, why would you not gather the complete picture of what exactly has happened? Why would not wait for the evidence and the rapidly changing public understanding and perception of what happened?
Do not underestimate the potential for the Mitch McConnell's of the world to turn their backs on Trump if they feel it is in their best political interests.
It is a calculated gamble. It is calculated to force Senate Republicans to vote to impeach Trump. And it's working perfectly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [94339]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 95570
Joined: 12/25/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [34877]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 41600
Joined: 4/20/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22456]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 31338
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Who needs whistleblowers when you have first hand accounts
Oct 15, 2019, 8:25 AM
|
|
testifying before Congress and you have Trump admitting to the crime?
We're way past the whistleblower. You guys might want to catch up.
Then, you have Deep State John Bolton who didn't want to be involved in Trump's, Giuliani's, Sondland's and Pompeo's "drug deal."
Oh ####!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 8
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
