|
Replies: 41
| visibility 1
|
All-TigerNet [10400]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5714
Joined: 9/29/05
|
Muschamp has Scar 3-2 in the SEC
Oct 17, 2017, 9:54 AM
|
|
The 3 wins have come against teams with a combined 0-11 record in Conference play. That's coach of the year type stuff (sarcasm).
Hey lurking coots if 0-11 sounds familiar think back to 1999.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [3769]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5333
Joined: 11/9/08
|
Re: Muschamp has Scar 3-2 in the SEC
Oct 17, 2017, 10:02 AM
|
|
Yeah it will be interesting to see what happens when they play Georgia and Florida. Those teams at least have a pulse
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26022]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 20651
Joined: 7/31/07
|
Re: Muschamp has Scar 3-2 in the SEC
Oct 17, 2017, 10:04 AM
|
|
Talk about a pansy schedule and they should have lost 3 of those games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10400]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5714
Joined: 9/29/05
|
Re: Muschamp has Scar 3-2 in the SEC
Oct 17, 2017, 10:14 AM
|
|
I had one tell me this morning if they had a kicker they would be undefeated. I said y'alls kicker beat Louisiana Tech and Tennessee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6895]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 9187
Joined: 7/11/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2918]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1834
Joined: 9/3/07
|
An SEC fan's take on the SEC Standings
Oct 17, 2017, 12:18 PM
[ in reply to Re: Muschamp has Scar 3-2 in the SEC ] |
|
1. Bama/Georgia
2. Uh...
3. LSU?
4. Florida....I guess
5. Um...
6. Just accept that the SEC is the best.
I don't know what comes after six.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13038]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22361
Joined: 4/24/04
|
Auburn is OK... certainly better than Florida***
Oct 17, 2017, 12:39 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64591]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88998
Joined: 3/27/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13038]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22361
Joined: 4/24/04
|
Florida may have a pulse, but they are paralyzed from the
Oct 17, 2017, 12:38 PM
[ in reply to Re: Muschamp has Scar 3-2 in the SEC ] |
|
waist down and no longer have the use of their offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [38427]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33200
Joined: 7/28/11
|
Re: Muschamp has Scar 3-2 in the SEC
Oct 17, 2017, 7:20 PM
[ in reply to Re: Muschamp has Scar 3-2 in the SEC ] |
|
Georgia is going to lay the would , but UF is not a good football team . They couldn't beat LSU in the Swamp ...a week after Troy went to Baton Rouge and worked the Yellow Tigers .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3921]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4631
Joined: 7/11/03
|
But they beat Tennessee
Oct 17, 2017, 10:06 AM
|
|
And they had Peyton Manning. They get extra credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64591]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88998
Joined: 3/27/01
|
I always maintained...
Oct 17, 2017, 10:06 AM
|
|
that the only way $CU would ever win consistently in the $EC was if they dragged the rest of the league down to their level.
The SEC Least remains and is without question the absolute worst Division among all of the Power 5 conferences.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [45]
TigerPulse: 76%
Posts: 107
Joined: 10/16/17
|
SEC lEast sucks bigtime
Oct 17, 2017, 12:20 PM
|
|
Not sure about worst tho
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13038]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22361
Joined: 4/24/04
|
It's a 3 division race for that title and it's pretty close.
Oct 17, 2017, 12:44 PM
|
|
Pac 12 South, Big Ten West, and SEC East. Those three divisions are pretty clearly inferior to the rest of CFB.
Pac 12 South is probably the worst followed by Big Ten West, and then SEC East, but it's definitely a tallest midget contest. If it weren't for UGA being a lot better than projected, i think the SEC East would take the cake.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [45]
TigerPulse: 76%
Posts: 107
Joined: 10/16/17
|
So like you said, it ain't the SEC lEast
Oct 17, 2017, 10:31 PM
|
|
And the biggie dude said, "The SEC Least remains and is without question the absolute worst Division among all of the Power 5 conferences".
So yeah, no.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10905]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12989
Joined: 8/4/14
|
Who do you think is worse?? They have one good team and
Oct 17, 2017, 8:32 PM
[ in reply to SEC lEast sucks bigtime ] |
|
twp or three that are mediocre, at best. Then two or three that are pitiful!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [60232]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42559
Joined: 11/30/98
|
How many of SCAR's fallen opponent will fire their coach?
Oct 17, 2017, 10:17 AM
|
|
Tenn
Arky
Mizzou
so pretty much everybody except NC State right now?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64591]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88998
Joined: 3/27/01
|
Arky may be stuck with Bret Bielema....
Oct 17, 2017, 10:37 AM
|
|
if they can't afford to fire him.
He currently has a $15.4 million buyout that runs to the end of the calendar year. That is the largest buyout in $EC history. It drops to $11.7 million on January 1st.
Bielema’s original buyout from his initial 2012 contract was just $6.4 million, but the AD more than doubled it following Arkansas 7-6 2014 season.
And here I thought there was only one AD stupid enough to offer a coach that no other program on the planet was even remotely interested in hiring such a unbelievably foolish buyout.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [67853]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 115484
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Arky may be stuck with Bret Bielema....
Oct 17, 2017, 11:33 AM
|
|
he will rip through that in groceries in no time
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4341]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4968
Joined: 8/6/02
|
Re: Arky may be stuck with Bret Bielema....
Oct 17, 2017, 12:11 PM
[ in reply to Arky may be stuck with Bret Bielema.... ] |
|
Point for for TB / Terry Don reference. He saved himself with the Dabo hire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [45]
TigerPulse: 76%
Posts: 107
Joined: 10/16/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [51550]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43083
Joined: 8/10/04
|
Coot's at work are on cloud 9.***
Oct 17, 2017, 11:25 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64591]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88998
Joined: 3/27/01
|
Let them celebrate their mediocrity....
Oct 17, 2017, 11:28 AM
|
|
and another meaningless bowl trip to Shreveport or Birmingham.
Clemson will still stomp their a$$es in November.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2550]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1806
Joined: 10/21/15
|
Re: Coot's at work are on cloud 9.***
Oct 17, 2017, 11:30 AM
[ in reply to Coot's at work are on cloud 9.*** ] |
|
It's funny to see them upbeat, unaware of the typical downfall their miserable program will invariably face.
Then it's even more entertaining to watch them crash and burn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64591]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88998
Joined: 3/27/01
|
^^^^ THIS ^^^^***
Oct 17, 2017, 11:32 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1593]
TigerPulse: 77%
Posts: 2852
Joined: 6/9/17
|
Re: Coot's at work are on cloud 9.***
Oct 17, 2017, 11:39 AM
[ in reply to Re: Coot's at work are on cloud 9.*** ] |
|
Like it or not , I absolutely hate it but the Coots are getting better.
Our D will completely shut them down but if things don't improve we will have some trouble scoring on them.
If we played them this Sat we win 24-10.
That's with a healthy KB
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5072]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5618
Joined: 8/17/03
|
Re: Coot's at work are on cloud 9.***
Oct 17, 2017, 11:58 AM
|
|
I honestly think it's hard to say how good or how bad they are. They really didn't look that bad in SEC play in either of the past couple seasons either. They had some wins in those seasons including Tennessee and Missouri last season as well, and they really weren't blown out in more than a game or two. This season they beat NC State, but got outgained by 300 yards. Yes I know a win is a win, but the game was just weird. They beat a 1-5 Missouri team that has a 35-3 loss to Purdue. They have a 1 point win on a last second field goal against a 3-3 La. Tech team. They soundly beat a 2-4 Arkansas team, and they had an ugly win against a Tennessee team that is now 3-3 who was coming off a 4 point win over an 0-6 UMASS team, and a 41-0 loss to UGA. Outside of that they lost to Texas A&M who has themselves looked better the last couple weeks, but some of that better is against a 3-3 Florida team that is a few plays away from being 6-0, and a few plays away from being 1-5. They also lost by 10 at home to Kentucky, who is 5-1, but that 5-1 includes a 7 point win over Southern Miss, 11 point win over Eastern Kentucky, a 4 point win over Eastern Michigan, and a 6 point win over that 1-5 Missouri team.
I really don't know what to make out of all that outside of knowing South Carolina has trouble scoring on offense. You could say their defense has improved a lot, but have they really faced a good offense all season long outside of NC State?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6692]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11164
Joined: 10/14/07
|
Re: Coot's at work are on cloud 9.***
Oct 17, 2017, 12:00 PM
|
|
You could say they have a very, very weak schedule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1593]
TigerPulse: 77%
Posts: 2852
Joined: 6/9/17
|
Re: Coot's at work are on cloud 9.***
Oct 17, 2017, 12:27 PM
[ in reply to Re: Coot's at work are on cloud 9.*** ] |
|
All I'm saying is they don't suck as bad as I thought they would.
They will give UF all they can handle and they stop the run pretty good so the UGA game could be close.
The Tigers better not take them lightly because it will not be 56-7 this season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5072]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5618
Joined: 8/17/03
|
Re: Coot's at work are on cloud 9.***
Oct 17, 2017, 12:58 PM
|
|
They are 49th in run defense, which isn't terrible I suppose, but where's the good running offense they have faced? More importantly, where is a team on their schedule with a balanced offense? I'm honestly not trying to approach this from a hater point of view, I'm just saying their schedule has been weak sauce. I do agree they aren't terrible, or heck they wouldn't even be winning against the bad teams they're playing. I just recall many of their fans saying similar things last season, and hearing how they had a good defense. I kept saying they weren't facing any teams with an offense, and look at what they gave up against Clemson and South Florida.
Now, I do agree we aren't nearly the same offensive team as last season, so I could see your 24-10 score being very close to accurate. It's just hard to believe how many bad teams are in that conference right now. I actually think they beat Vandy and Florida at home and end up at 8-4 even with the loss to us. That will make them all feel great and much praise will be given to Muschamp for "turning things around." I just don't think their team is really all that much better than they were a couple years ago when they went 3-9. I just think the level of play around them has fallen so far that it appears that way. Remember that season they lost several close games including the one against us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1482]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 2011
Joined: 3/4/11
|
Re: Coot's at work are on cloud 9.***
Oct 17, 2017, 8:25 PM
[ in reply to Re: Coot's at work are on cloud 9.*** ] |
|
>
> They really didn't look that bad in SEC
> play in either of the past couple seasons either.
>
What the F is "SEC play"?
They didn't play Alabama the past couple years. We did. That's about it for the SEC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64591]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88998
Joined: 3/27/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5072]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5618
Joined: 8/17/03
|
Re: Muschamp has Scar 3-2 in the SEC
Oct 17, 2017, 11:39 AM
|
|
No better sign of the current state of the SEC than to see a 5-2 South Carolina not ranked, even though they have an OOC win over a team that is now in the top 25.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2883]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2225
Joined: 3/7/06
|
Re: Muschamp has Scar 3-2 in the SEC
Oct 17, 2017, 12:18 PM
|
|
Excellent point!
Go Tigers!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5072]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5618
Joined: 8/17/03
|
Re: Muschamp has Scar 3-2 in the SEC
Oct 17, 2017, 11:45 AM
|
|
Also, that trend will continue in their next game as they play Vandy next who is 0-4 in the SEC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: Muschamp has Scar 3-2 in the SEC
Oct 17, 2017, 1:24 PM
|
|
Is that really that much worse than the 4-9 record of your opponents?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [25006]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 32316
Joined: 2/15/09
|
0-11 is worse than 4-9 yes***
Oct 17, 2017, 1:26 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64591]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88998
Joined: 3/27/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1837]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1215
Joined: 11/13/03
|
Re: Muschamp has Scar 3-2 in the SEC
Oct 17, 2017, 3:36 PM
[ in reply to Re: Muschamp has Scar 3-2 in the SEC ] |
|
Well yes it is much worse. Without the 4 losses to us our opponents are 4 and 5.
Without the 3 losses to your team your opponents are 0 and 8.
4 and 5 is much better than 0 and 8.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1482]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 2011
Joined: 3/4/11
|
Re: Muschamp has Scar 3-2 in the SEC
Oct 17, 2017, 8:26 PM
[ in reply to Re: Muschamp has Scar 3-2 in the SEC ] |
|
> Is that really that much worse than the 4-9 record of
> your opponents?
Yes, yes it is.
Math. It's like countin' and stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9735]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 9842
Joined: 9/16/15
|
6-10 I believe. you're a usc guy so counting isn't a strong trait.
Oct 17, 2017, 8:37 PM
[ in reply to Re: Muschamp has Scar 3-2 in the SEC ] |
|
cuse 2-1
wake 1-2
bc 1-3
Lou 1-3
va tech 1-1
record 6-10
but not 0-11
Message was edited by: H8nusc®
Message was edited by: H8nusc®
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1944]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2463
Joined: 8/2/15
|
Re: Muschamp has Scar 3-2 in the SEC
Oct 17, 2017, 10:58 PM
[ in reply to Re: Muschamp has Scar 3-2 in the SEC ] |
|
That’s a great question, but the answer isn’t very complicated. Most people would get this without much thought, but in your case let’s review: any number of value > (is greater than) 0. For example, a number of value is any number that’s a “bigger” number than zero. Feel free to read this as many times as you need until you comprehend. ??
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 41
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
