|
Replies: 11
| visibility 3,243
|
Orange Blooded [4108]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4378
Joined: 10/22/14
|
ACC just made a business decision
Oct 7, 2017, 7:26 PM
|
|
That replay showed the Miami wr was down 8" short of the goal line.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [67851]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 115481
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: ACC just made a business decision
Oct 7, 2017, 7:27 PM
|
|
you are so wrong
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3981]
TigerPulse: 91%
Posts: 5094
Joined: 8/23/16
|
Re: ACC just made a business decision
Oct 7, 2017, 7:34 PM
|
|
He was down dude
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [67851]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 115481
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: ACC just made a business decision- please explain
Oct 7, 2017, 7:53 PM
|
|
if his knee hits a foot away and when that happens the ball is up near his shoulder how it hasnt crossed the goal when he is amost parallel to ground
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16733]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16764
Joined: 8/19/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [36450]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18324
Joined: 12/6/13
|
I don't agree. The replay was really hard to tell.
Oct 7, 2017, 7:28 PM
|
|
I think it was a scenario where whatever the call on the field was they had to go with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4108]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4378
Joined: 10/22/14
|
Re: I don't agree. The replay was really hard to tell.
Oct 7, 2017, 7:31 PM
|
|
I do agree that it would be hard to call it irrefutable, and thus you are correct, if the ref had called down it definitely would have been upheld IMO. But that one angle, at least to me showed his knee was down as it didn't move once it struck, and the ball was 6-8 inches from pylon. Besides, if it's close, who do you want that call going To? A 1-2 team or a 3-0 team that is ranked? Just my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5289]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5451
Joined: 9/11/04
|
Re: I don't agree. The replay was really hard to tell.
Oct 7, 2017, 7:33 PM
|
|
I agree that it would have been upheld either way it was called. Just a bad tv angle to tell from. With as big as college football is I don't know why we don't have goal line camera angles for all games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5289]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5451
Joined: 9/11/04
|
Re: ACC just made a business decision
Oct 7, 2017, 7:28 PM
|
|
What? It was at an angle from the far corner of the end zone. No way you can overturn that from that angle. Especially with the ref right there with a perfect view of it. It would have been different if it was a shot right down the line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1685]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 1128
Joined: 5/22/15
|
Re: ACC just made a business decision
Oct 7, 2017, 7:35 PM
|
|
He was in, there was no angle that refuted the call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6982]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6355
Joined: 9/21/04
|
Nah, not enough to overturn the ruling on the field
Oct 7, 2017, 7:33 PM
|
|
they said the ruling on the field "stands" not confirmed, meaning not enough evidence to overturn the ruling. I would've lost my mind if they would've Taken that touchdown away
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [140553]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33875
Joined: 12/5/10
|
Didn't see it, but FSU radio said it was close, but wouldn’t
Oct 7, 2017, 8:32 PM
|
|
be overturned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 11
| visibility 3,243
|
|
|
50
