|
Replies: 10
| visibility 1
|
Scout Team [151]
TigerPulse: 44%
Posts: 105
Joined: 8/28/10
|
Who do we lose to the NFL
Nov 4, 2012, 10:45 AM
|
|
this year??
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [67848]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 115478
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Who do we lose to the NFL
Nov 4, 2012, 10:47 AM
|
|
Freeman, Williard, as far as early departures I dont think anyone leaves. really TB and DH both could benefit with another year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [229]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 239
Joined: 1/2/12
|
Re: Who do we lose to the NFL
Nov 4, 2012, 10:48 AM
|
|
Nuk and Ellington are gone!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10345]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12803
Joined: 11/22/03
|
Re: Who do we lose to the NFL
Nov 4, 2012, 10:51 AM
|
|
Ellington would be gone anyway. Nuk not so sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [151]
TigerPulse: 44%
Posts: 105
Joined: 8/28/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [67848]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 115478
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Who do we lose to the NFL- AE right
Nov 4, 2012, 10:52 AM
[ in reply to Re: Who do we lose to the NFL ] |
|
I dont see Nuk leaving but if he does Peak and Bryant are still around
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [229]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 239
Joined: 1/2/12
|
Re: Who do we lose to the NFL- AE right
Nov 4, 2012, 10:55 AM
|
|
Crossing my fingers Nuk piulls a CJ and says! Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [58415]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 46324
Joined: 4/23/00
|
Obviously, Ellington is gone. I don't see how Nuk could
Nov 4, 2012, 10:56 AM
[ in reply to Re: Who do we lose to the NFL ] |
|
possibly benefit from staying another year, unless this year's group of WRs entering the draft is expected to be significantly better than next year's. He almost certainly won't have a bigger year next year, especially with Sammy back full strength. he won't get any bigger, faster, or stronger here at Clemson than he would with an NFL S&C program. So, he really has nothing more to prove, nothing to gain, and coming back could potentially hurt him, as he risks injury and having production fall off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expert [1494]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 5622
Joined: 8/11/04
|
I think Nuke is only underclassman to leave
Nov 4, 2012, 10:57 AM
|
|
And while I don't think Nuke will be a first round pick. He could go 2nd and I think more likely in 3rd.
But what drops him down in draft is his 40 time. And I don't think if he comes back that will improve much. He could get stronger.
Not to mention if he comes back, he'll be in same draft class as Sammy and Marqise Lee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [58415]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 46324
Joined: 4/23/00
|
Bingo - really nothing to gain by coming back. I know his 40
Nov 4, 2012, 11:00 AM
|
|
time is supposedly a source of concern, but he consistently gets behind DBs for the deep ball.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1626]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 4771
Joined: 11/15/11
|
Nuk
Nov 4, 2012, 10:58 AM
|
|
Needs to leave if he is a 1-2 round pick no need to lose money by comeing back and getting latimored.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 10
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
