|
Replies: 40
| visibility 1
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2/8/11
|
Starting Defense
Jan 13, 2016, 3:51 PM
|
|
SSDE - Bryant
WSDE - Ferrell
DT - Wilkins
DT - Watkins
MLB - Bouleware
WLM - Lamar
SAM - Joseph
CB - Fields
CB - Tank
SS - Wiggins
FS - Gibson, Johnson
Gonna have to be a top 25 unit for another Natty shot.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2/8/11
|
Forgot about Chad Smith at LB.***
Jan 13, 2016, 3:52 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2111]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2835
Joined: 6/30/14
|
Re: Starting Defense
Jan 13, 2016, 3:53 PM
|
|
Yeargin? you think he could be a 3rd down pass rusher? similar to VIC when he was a RS SO
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2/8/11
|
Part of the 2 deep, yes***
Jan 13, 2016, 3:54 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2006]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2736
Joined: 9/23/12
|
Re: Starting Defense
Jan 13, 2016, 3:54 PM
[ in reply to Re: Starting Defense ] |
|
Clelin would have played more this year if he didnt get hurt. You are talking about a 6'6 260 DE. He's going to play and play A LOT next year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2006]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2736
Joined: 9/23/12
|
Re: Starting Defense
Jan 13, 2016, 3:53 PM
|
|
So we are going to a traditional 4-3 now?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2/8/11
|
Depends on who we play really***
Jan 13, 2016, 3:54 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2006]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2736
Joined: 9/23/12
|
Re: Depends on who we play really***
Jan 13, 2016, 3:59 PM
|
|
I bet we see Van Smith out there a lot as well. We will be deeper in the secondary i think next year.
Edmonds
Smith
Fields
Baker
Tank
Carter
Gibson
Johnson
Johnson
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6662]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9535
Joined: 1/16/99
|
Re: Starting Defense
Jan 13, 2016, 3:56 PM
[ in reply to Re: Starting Defense ] |
|
We've been running that for the last couple of years now. Do you guys think they may make a move to put Wilkins at DE? Front four of Bryant, Watkins, Pagano/Lawrence, and Wilkins?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2006]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2736
Joined: 9/23/12
|
Re: Starting Defense
Jan 13, 2016, 3:57 PM
|
|
Like Wood said depending on who and what we play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [294]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 476
Joined: 3/5/06
|
here's mine
Jan 13, 2016, 3:57 PM
|
|
SDE 91-A Bryant-So 85-D Rogers-Jr* 93-S Johnson-Fr*
DT 94-C Watkins-Sr* 42-C Wilkins-So 50-J Robinson-So*
DT 56-S Pagano-Jr* 67-A Huggins-So 95-G Cervenka-Fr*
WDE 49-R Yeargin-So* 45-C Register-So* 99-C Ferrell-Fr*
Nick/SLB 6-D O'Daniel-Jr* 35-Ch Smith-Fr*
MLB 34-K Joseph-So* 36-Ju Davis-So
WLB 10-B Boulware-Sr 30-J Williams-So 33-JD Davis-So
CB 21-A Baker-Jr* 29-M Edmond-Jr* 20-K Chalmers-Fr*
CB 25-C Tankersley-Sr 31-R Carter-Jr* 24-M Fields-So
SS 18-J Johnson-Sr 14-D Johnson-Fr*
FS 23-V Smith-So 17-J Gibson-So* 19-T Muse-Fr*
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2/8/11
|
Dexter Lawrence will not redshirt. Cervanka to Oline
Jan 13, 2016, 4:04 PM
|
|
C. Ferrell was Venables #1 DE in 2015. He will play/start.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2441]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 3968
Joined: 4/8/04
|
Agree with most, but I think Wilkins starts and Lawrence is
Jan 13, 2016, 4:09 PM
[ in reply to here's mine ] |
|
in the two deep at DT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4659]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6063
Joined: 10/20/15
|
Re: here's mine
Jan 13, 2016, 4:18 PM
[ in reply to here's mine ] |
|
No Lawrence, Smith or Lamar?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15492]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18413
Joined: 12/10/14
|
Re: here's mine
Jan 13, 2016, 4:39 PM
[ in reply to here's mine ] |
|
Left out Wilkins and Dex at DT?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2352]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2772
Joined: 12/6/11
|
Re: here's mine
Jan 13, 2016, 4:43 PM
|
|
I wouldn't be surprised to see Shadell Bell moved to DB. I'd rather him get some snaps there than be stuck behind all of the talented receivers we have. Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2783]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3409
Joined: 4/14/11
|
O'Daniel? He's shown some skills
Jan 13, 2016, 3:57 PM
|
|
especially against the run
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2/8/11
|
He'll play alot more.***
Jan 13, 2016, 4:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3427]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2728
Joined: 7/19/13
|
I think Dorian O'Daniel starts at SAM
Jan 13, 2016, 3:58 PM
|
|
Boulware at Mike and Joseph at Will
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2/8/11
|
Rahshaun Smith and Tre Lamar will compete for starting
Jan 13, 2016, 4:02 PM
|
|
spots as will Chad Smith
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3427]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2728
Joined: 7/19/13
|
how's the learning curve for LB's in our defense?
Jan 13, 2016, 4:04 PM
|
|
I would assume experience plays a factor early. But those 3 you named are studs so they'll be on the field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1246]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1222
Joined: 9/10/15
|
Tiger Woods
Jan 13, 2016, 4:00 PM
|
|
Do you see Rashaun Smith seeing significant playing time next year? He seems like a sure fire bet for a LB spot!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2/8/11
|
Yes, Instant impact guy. Lamar as well.***
Jan 13, 2016, 4:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6662]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9535
Joined: 1/16/99
|
Re: Yes, Instant impact guy. Lamar as well.***
Jan 13, 2016, 4:05 PM
|
|
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeelllllllllllllll, I see Chad Smith probably running beside Boulware. They say (who are they, you ask?) that he has bulked up and gotten stronger. The guy is ready to make his move. Joseph and Williams will make some noise as will McDaniel. I dont see these guys letting some true freshman outwork them. Lamar and Smith are going to be very good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2006]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2736
Joined: 9/23/12
|
Re: Tiger Woods
Jan 13, 2016, 4:03 PM
[ in reply to Tiger Woods ] |
|
He will get playing time for sure.. But Tre Lemar is a monster of epic proportions I dont know why he was rated so low. he looks like a grown man beside Rahshaun Smith and he is just as fast. Secondly he outweighs him by 15 lbs lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9734]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 9842
Joined: 9/16/15
|
Re: Tiger Woods
Jan 13, 2016, 4:06 PM
|
|
I noticed that as well. They were sitting side by side during all star game and Lamar looked way thicker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [75]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 61
Joined: 9/3/99
|
Van Smith
Jan 13, 2016, 4:04 PM
|
|
I look for this kid to make a lot of noise
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27186]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16027
Joined: 10/13/08
|
Looks good, you just forgot to put R. Gary in there***
Jan 13, 2016, 4:11 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3427]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2728
Joined: 7/19/13
|
Gary at SDE?
Jan 13, 2016, 4:12 PM
|
|
He'd at least be on two deep at every DL position IMO. We'd need him on the edge more than in the middle though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27186]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16027
Joined: 10/13/08
|
Re: Gary at SDE?
Jan 13, 2016, 4:13 PM
|
|
With Dodd gone you can bet the staff is selling that idea during his visit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3427]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2728
Joined: 7/19/13
|
Could you imagine Gary + Wilkins + Lawrence.....?
Jan 13, 2016, 4:15 PM
|
|
holy cow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27186]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16027
Joined: 10/13/08
|
Re: Could you imagine Gary + Wilkins + Lawrence.....?
Jan 13, 2016, 4:16 PM
|
|
The TFL/sack numbers would be insane and have NFL scouts drooling...that is a major selling point for us to land Gary.
Michigan definitely leads as of today but it isn't a stretch to imagine us landing him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16853]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9372
Joined: 11/1/14
|
Re: Could you imagine Gary + Wilkins + Lawrence.....?
Jan 13, 2016, 4:20 PM
[ in reply to Could you imagine Gary + Wilkins + Lawrence.....? ] |
|
I'm trying...and if you have those three...one would think Venables is toying with a 3-4 with the size and versatility at his disposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27186]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16027
Joined: 10/13/08
|
^^^^^^^^^^This***
Jan 13, 2016, 4:21 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3427]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2728
Joined: 7/19/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4966]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 6028
Joined: 4/9/11
|
No way Fields starts over Adrian Baker***
Jan 13, 2016, 4:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14488]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11103
Joined: 4/2/12
|
Cant see Joseph at SAM
Jan 13, 2016, 4:18 PM
|
|
Not fast enough...he reminds me of Goodson - short, stout, and hard-hitting. Will be solid at either of the other 2 LB spots
I see O'Daniel and Wiggins at SAM with Wiggins possibly playing some safety as well
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1900]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 4300
Joined: 10/10/10
|
Don't forget about korrin Wiggins***
Jan 13, 2016, 4:34 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1692]
TigerPulse: 82%
Posts: 1996
Joined: 10/13/10
|
Re: Starting Defense
Jan 13, 2016, 4:34 PM
|
|
Here is how I see it
SDE- Bryant
WDE- Ferrell, Yeargin
NT- Pagano/Lawrence
DT- Watkins/Wilkins
MLB- Joseph, Lamar/C-Smith
WLB- Bouleware, R-Smith
SLB- O'Daniel
NB- Wiggins/Carter , Muse
CB- Tank
CB- Baker, Fields
SS- Gibson/Smith
FS- Johnson
/ = Co starter and , = 2nd string but will play in certain packages
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1692]
TigerPulse: 82%
Posts: 1996
Joined: 10/13/10
|
Re: Starting Defense
Jan 13, 2016, 4:41 PM
|
|
*boulware
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3820]
TigerPulse: 82%
Posts: 4395
Joined: 12/24/09
|
talented but inexperienced - heard that before...
Jan 13, 2016, 4:48 PM
|
|
just no Shaq Lawson's in the bunch unless you count Watkins and Wilkins.
no Mac Alexander's in the bunch unless you count Tank.
who you got for nickel and dime? Carter and Baker?
may be the most important aspect of next year's D...
with the lack of premier speed at DT and the "slow inside rush" we employed this year,
we went more dime as the year wore on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 40
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
