|
Replies: 25
| visibility 1
|
Asst Coach [702]
TigerPulse: 62%
Posts: 810
Joined: 11/15/14
|
The picked up flag was the proper call because
Jan 4, 2015, 8:08 PM
|
|
There was only minimal contact by both players and the defender did not change the direction of the receiver. He has the right to his space and the ball hit him in the back. The reciever can't decide to go through him and then expect pass interference. Picking up the flag was correct.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [11435]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 14500
Joined: 1/2/11
|
Are you kidding me? There have been 3 refs
Jan 4, 2015, 8:10 PM
|
|
who have said that was a bad call. You're the only person I have seen say that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [702]
TigerPulse: 62%
Posts: 810
Joined: 11/15/14
|
so? Now u have heard someone who agrees with the no call***
Jan 4, 2015, 8:12 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13605]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12897
Joined: 8/10/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Devotee [330]
TigerPulse: 52%
Posts: 372
Joined: 7/28/14
|
Re: The picked up flag was the proper call because
Jan 4, 2015, 8:11 PM
|
|
says a cowboy fan
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [60229]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42557
Joined: 11/30/98
|
You should be watching Tom Jackson on ESPN now
Jan 4, 2015, 8:13 PM
|
|
he says not only was there PI, there was also a unsportsmanlike conduct on Dez Bryant for being out on the field without his helmet arguing.
No worries, Jerry's Boys will get their just punishment next week in the snow of Green Bay. It's supposed to be highs in the 30's here in SC next Sunday, so I know it'll be unbearable in Wisconsin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4747]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 6973
Joined: 1/24/07
|
Re: You should be watching Tom Jackson on ESPN now
Jan 4, 2015, 8:17 PM
|
|
High of 19º, low of 4º. I hate the Packers as much as the Cowboys, so I think I'd rather a giant sinkhole swallow the stadium.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [646]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1527
Joined: 6/22/00
|
Yeah we all know the announcers know what they are
Jan 4, 2015, 10:15 PM
[ in reply to You should be watching Tom Jackson on ESPN now ] |
|
talking about. I mean Ed Cunningham and Jesse Palmer have proven that to be true. By the way I could list more I just do not think there is enough space for me to do so
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2165]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2744
Joined: 6/12/11
|
He was looking at the WR, not going after the ball and hit/
Jan 4, 2015, 8:14 PM
|
|
pulled the WR before the ball got there... That is PI all day, every day. Had he been turned around and making a play on the ball, then diffent story.. Until then..
/ thread. End of story.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [702]
TigerPulse: 62%
Posts: 810
Joined: 11/15/14
|
Re: He was looking at the WR, not going after the ball and hit/
Jan 4, 2015, 8:15 PM
|
|
He does not have to play the ball to have a right to his space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [60229]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42557
Joined: 11/30/98
|
in the NFL, yes you do.
Jan 4, 2015, 8:17 PM
|
|
in college football, you can faceguard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [646]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1527
Joined: 6/22/00
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6692]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11164
Joined: 10/14/07
|
Re: in the NFL, yes you do.
Jan 4, 2015, 10:11 PM
|
|
Yup, and even if there was he couldn't turn his head with the receiver grabbing his face mask.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2165]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2744
Joined: 6/12/11
|
But to hit/pull/grab/etc at a WR before the ball
Jan 4, 2015, 8:19 PM
[ in reply to Re: He was looking at the WR, not going after the ball and hit/ ] |
|
arrives, you have to be making a play on the ball directly and, hence the name, not interfering the WR.
I don't have a dog in this fight... I'm not a Cowboys fan, Lions fan, or fan of any NFL team, but that was PI. Dallas got away with one, good for them. I'm sure my old man is happy because he's a huge Dallas homer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5960]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5687
Joined: 7/3/12
|
Simplyputtiger, that was PI all day
Jan 4, 2015, 8:49 PM
[ in reply to Re: He was looking at the WR, not going after the ball and hit/ ] |
|
The fact the refs changed the call for whatever reason, and Bryant came onto field arguing with no call, prove that there was something out of place... National TV audience saw inept refs trying to change the direction of a game with no hint of integrity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [787]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 1410
Joined: 9/22/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2165]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2744
Joined: 6/12/11
|
;)
Jan 4, 2015, 8:30 PM
|
|
Ya got me there!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [787]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 1410
Joined: 9/22/14
|
Re: ;)
Jan 4, 2015, 8:34 PM
|
|
But every real fan should hate to see a call like that in a playoff game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6692]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11164
Joined: 10/14/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [29036]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 36097
Joined: 8/28/00
|
Indeed he did
Jan 4, 2015, 10:39 PM
|
|
And had that been the call then there'd be no argument otherwise.
But it wasn't.
The call was made and then picked up after an opposing player ran onto the field from the bench and yelled at the ref.
You just can't set that precedent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1038]
TigerPulse: 36%
Posts: 2527
Joined: 8/10/11
|
point is, there was no contact
Jan 4, 2015, 8:18 PM
|
|
facegaurding is only illegal when you make contact and you're not playing the ball.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [201]
TigerPulse: 23%
Posts: 734
Joined: 10/22/01
|
Re: point is, there was no contact
Jan 4, 2015, 8:34 PM
|
|
No contact.... are you blind, and just listening to the game, that's the only excuse for someone saying there was no contact
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [646]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1527
Joined: 6/22/00
|
Re: point is, there was no contact
Jan 4, 2015, 10:12 PM
|
|
Most of the contact was initiated by the receiver. If you watch all the way through you will see the receiver grab the facemask and the the defender.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [29036]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 36097
Joined: 8/28/00
|
3 Problems with this play
Jan 4, 2015, 10:38 PM
|
|
1) That play is called PI 99% of the time in the NFL. We all watch tons of football and have seen underthrown balls where the receiver comes back through the defender who isn't playing the ball called PI a million times. And that's even disregarding the fact that there was contact byt he defender's hand on the chest/arm of the receiver.
But, even granting it was a close call (which, honestly in real time it was)...
2) You positively cannot announce the penalty and then reverse it. That's reeks of incompetence by the officiating staff
But, even granting that it was a simple error by the refs....
3) You 100% cannot, under any circumstances, ever, reverse an already called penalty a few moments after a player runs onto the field from the bench to argue the call without his helmet on.
At least you can't do #2 or #3 without looking idiotic at best or less than fair at worst.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [36409]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 21512
Joined: 10/27/03
|
WRONG ! 100% Defensive Pass Interference***
Jan 4, 2015, 8:36 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1788]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4131
Joined: 11/25/12
|
Re: The picked up flag was the proper call because
Jan 4, 2015, 10:45 PM
|
|
I am a Cowboy fan and I think it was BS 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 25
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
