|
Replies: 18
| visibility 1
|
Rock Defender [54]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 119
Joined: 8/20/11
|
Offside Call
Dec 6, 2015, 12:04 AM
|
|
Could it have been the kickers plant foot making it offside?
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1714]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2492
Joined: 10/14/11
|
Re: Offside Call
Dec 6, 2015, 12:05 AM
|
|
Great point! Didn't think of that!
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7219]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6986
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Offside Call
Dec 6, 2015, 12:06 AM
|
|
That rule was changed 50 years ago. Kickers plant foot is never offsides.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7219]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6986
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Offside Call
Dec 6, 2015, 12:05 AM
|
|
No, it was parallax. Camera is at the 50. Ref is looking down the line. Ref is correct. ABC is wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1535]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 1370
Joined: 6/3/06
|
Uh...yeah...no. There was no offsides.***
Dec 6, 2015, 12:09 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7219]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6986
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Uh...yeah...no. There was no offsides.***
Dec 6, 2015, 12:12 AM
|
|
Uh, yes there was. The only evidence you have is a misplaced camera. I have an eyewitness looking directly down the line. I win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [313]
TigerPulse: 91%
Posts: 735
Joined: 10/6/06
|
Re: Uh...yeah...no. There was no offsides.***
Dec 6, 2015, 12:13 AM
|
|
Found it weird they didn't mention that issue. The fact they drew a line across the screen at one point was pretty dumb considering the angle. You can see how that one leading guy could have had his arms and upper body over the line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22965]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 25005
Joined: 6/24/99
|
clemson32 was identified as a coot long ago.....
Dec 6, 2015, 12:49 AM
|
|
just ignore
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10911]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12995
Joined: 8/4/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [187]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 269
Joined: 11/30/98
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5078]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 8324
Joined: 12/9/12
|
Re: Offside Call
Dec 6, 2015, 12:06 AM
|
|
Fck it! Who cares! I'm over it! Go Tigers baby. We deserve this moment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [122]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 189
Joined: 2/9/01
|
Re: Offside Call
Dec 6, 2015, 12:12 AM
|
|
It's a huge leap of faith to think the holes were going to score if not called for offsides. AND they would have needed a 2 pt conversion also. Like the one that failed on their first score.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [864]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 794
Joined: 11/9/12
|
Re: Offside Call
Dec 6, 2015, 12:15 AM
|
|
Makes up for the "phantom interception" when their d lineman put the ball on the ground. Unc turned that bs call into six points.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [40970]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42973
Joined: 11/30/98
|
well we know if ND could score 2 they win in overtime
Dec 6, 2015, 12:24 AM
[ in reply to Re: Offside Call ] |
|
just cuz
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [15]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 52
Joined: 10/20/11
|
Re: Offside Call
Dec 6, 2015, 12:27 AM
[ in reply to Re: Offside Call ] |
|
This is the correct way to think about it
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3507]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4149
Joined: 9/27/14
|
None of it matters. Holes still needed a TD and a 2 pt. just
Dec 6, 2015, 12:20 AM
|
|
to tie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6321]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5728
Joined: 11/2/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4139]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5535
Joined: 12/26/05
|
Lets have some pizza and move on***
Dec 6, 2015, 12:45 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [54]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 119
Joined: 8/20/11
|
Re: Offside Call
Dec 6, 2015, 12:47 AM
|
|
Someone showing a picture looks like UNC had ten players on the field during kick off?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 18
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
