Replies: 40
| visibility 1
|
Commissioner [956]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 1559
Joined: 6/4/12
|
ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE...
Jan 14, 2020, 12:39 AM
|
|
That there were at least two targeting no calls on LSU when Rodgers was speared in the back while defenseless (yes pass was high but still), and before Lawrence fumbled it was textbook targeting.
Congrats to LSU on the win but if Skalski gets that flukey targeting how are these calls legit?
|
|
|
|
All-In [27434]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10148
Joined: 2/14/13
|
Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE...
Jan 14, 2020, 12:39 AM
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2182]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 2478
Joined: 10/10/13
|
Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE...
Jan 14, 2020, 12:40 AM
|
|
Stop it...dont embarrass yourself
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [480]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 582
Joined: 11/20/17
|
Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE...
Jan 14, 2020, 12:42 AM
|
|
The LSU saw the pass go high before he lowered his head, Skalski made a poor football play. I'm not mad he got called, I'm mad the other call wasn't made.
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [783]
TigerPulse: 69%
Posts: 1808
Joined: 1/12/19
|
Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE...
Jan 14, 2020, 8:58 AM
|
|
How about a crackback block 40 yards downfield when the cat you are blocking is looking at you...Higgins & Dabo should have been mortified...Skalski targeting...Higgins crack back...it's not like Higgins cleaned his plow...he just bumped him off! ABC was going to make sure Dabo was not on any stage thanking GOD after this game! If Amari was not defenseless then nobody has ever been and that dud official saying it was a legal hit...he clearly saw the ball sail over Amaris head before he ever started his hit! Don't stop a play to review out of bounds...who was upstairs reviewing...if ESPN sees the hand down then the officials surely can!
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9661]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9003
Joined: 11/29/15
|
Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE...
Jan 14, 2020, 9:08 AM
|
|
ABC now is conspiring to make sure Dabo isn’t thanking god? You just took this to another level of stupid!
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4553]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4196
Joined: 5/28/99
|
Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE...
Jan 14, 2020, 12:40 AM
|
|
Yes. Yes we are.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1404]
TigerPulse: 82%
Posts: 1919
Joined: 4/19/05
|
Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE...
Jan 14, 2020, 12:40 AM
|
|
No
We will not. Trevor fumble was not targeting.
Come on man!
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [58642]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 46419
Joined: 4/23/00
|
It doesn't matter now. But for the record, it was
Jan 14, 2020, 12:44 AM
|
|
targeting by rule. Defender lowered the head and made forcible contact with the crown of the helmet.
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [783]
TigerPulse: 69%
Posts: 1808
Joined: 1/12/19
|
Re: It doesn't matter now. But for the record, it was
Jan 14, 2020, 9:03 AM
|
|
He led his contact with his shoulder...the helment hit the player after the initial contact...you can exactly put the crown of the helment on his ###..new ad on GRIT channel...if you've ever been his by the crown of a helment call us at BR549 and the law firm of Schmedlap, Farquar & Aardvark will get you the cash that you deserve...BR549 is a Baton Rouge number and Junior Sample as well!
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4858]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 4887
Joined: 1/8/19
|
Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE...
Jan 14, 2020, 12:40 AM
|
|
Oh please. We got it handed to us tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [8]
TigerPulse: 14%
Posts: 32
Joined: 12/29/19
|
Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE...
Jan 14, 2020, 12:41 AM
|
|
Remember when you guys were calling out OSU fans for crying about officiating?
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [840]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 2112
Joined: 9/27/08
|
Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE...
Jan 14, 2020, 12:50 AM
|
|
The difference is, they were clearly in the wrong. Tonight, was clearly different
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5458]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5200
Joined: 12/3/07
|
Except it was 80% of your fan base b*tching about it.
Jan 14, 2020, 12:52 AM
[ in reply to Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE... ] |
|
There’s like 1 or 2 guys on here arguing about the refs. Everyone else (the vast majority) is congratulating LSU.
This is what a good fan base does. Sorry that your brethren couldn’t extend the same congratulations to us when we beat you.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9661]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9003
Joined: 11/29/15
|
Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE...
Jan 14, 2020, 9:02 AM
[ in reply to Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE... ] |
|
One low pulse says something stupid and another low pulse calls out the entire fanbase over it. Troll your way down the Ohio River turd!
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11934]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16363
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Those calls didn’t cost us the game.
Jan 14, 2020, 12:41 AM
|
|
Not worth dwelling on.
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [336]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 233
Joined: 10/23/11
|
Re: Those calls didn’t cost us the game.
Jan 14, 2020, 12:44 AM
|
|
We had a harder path to finals. Oklahoma was a skip in the park compared to OSU. It does matter. LSU was the better team. Tigers will be back.
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [643]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 827
Joined: 12/7/15
|
Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE...
Jan 14, 2020, 12:42 AM
|
|
Just let it go. You will be happier.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [66101]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33370
Joined: 12/3/03
|
Careful, your inner Ohio State is showing. The officiating
Jan 14, 2020, 12:43 AM
|
|
did not come close to costing us this game. Probably equal number of calls good and bad both ways.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5714]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 12197
Joined: 9/28/08
|
Re: Careful, your inner Ohio State is showing. The officiating
Jan 14, 2020, 8:47 AM
|
|
Agree.
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [347]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 1062
Joined: 7/1/19
|
If you don’t know the rules, don’t comment on officiating.
Jan 14, 2020, 12:43 AM
|
|
Better to keep quiet and not let others see what a moron you are.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13056]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22372
Joined: 4/24/04
|
The hit on Amari was not targeting
Jan 14, 2020, 12:44 AM
|
|
You could argue that a hit like that should be penalized, but I'm sure everyone on Tigernet would freak the hell out of Muse got ejected for that same hit. It's legal within the current rules of CFB.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [40369]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 23474
Joined: 7/13/12
|
my only question on that hit
Jan 14, 2020, 12:56 AM
|
|
What’s the difference between that and the blindside hit we got called for earlier in the game?
I’m not blaming refs at all and don’t think any of the calls actually dictated the outcome.
I truly don’t understand how to differentiate between the blind side from the side and the one from the back.
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [45]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 114
Joined: 7/15/14
|
Re: my only question on that hit
Jan 14, 2020, 1:02 AM
|
|
the one from the back was not a block. It was a tackle.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2248]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3227
Joined: 10/29/17
|
Re: my only question on that hit
Jan 14, 2020, 2:00 AM
[ in reply to my only question on that hit ] |
|
I'm not saying it was the wrong call because I don't know how the blindside block call is written, but could somebody explain it? They literally went facemask to facemask. Are you not able to block the guy if he isn't looking?
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [840]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 2112
Joined: 9/27/08
|
Re: my only question on that hit
Jan 14, 2020, 7:05 AM
|
|
Exactly. That was another poor call
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5714]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 12197
Joined: 9/28/08
|
The blindside was in fact not a blindside
Jan 14, 2020, 8:49 AM
[ in reply to my only question on that hit ] |
|
Our guy's head and shoulder were clearly to the front of the LSU player. I don't know the verbiage of the rules, but man, that sure didn't look like a blind side.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [40970]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42973
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Yet Tee gets 15 yards for a clean block for unnecessary
Jan 14, 2020, 9:01 AM
[ in reply to The hit on Amari was not targeting ] |
|
roughness. The hit on Amari was not targeting, but it was unnecessary roughness. The defender knew he didn't have the ball and hit him anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [632]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 930
Joined: 9/16/14
|
Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE...
Jan 14, 2020, 12:44 AM
|
|
No, we shouldn’t ignore this atrocity!
We need to blow up Twitter, get Dabo to assemble a special investigation! This is an outrage! We would have won!
Not
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1778]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 2089
Joined: 12/28/15
|
Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE...
Jan 14, 2020, 12:45 AM
|
|
Yes, the whole destiny thing was in the officials head, but you have to over come bad officiating the team didn’t t make enough plays to win today.
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [956]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 1559
Joined: 6/4/12
|
Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE...
Jan 14, 2020, 12:49 AM
|
|
Are you going to say the rule has accomplished what it set out to? Has it been consistently and fairly implemented?
And for the record if I’m referencing the PLAY before Lawrence fumbled. Go back and watch.
Would it change the outcome? Don’t know. But if you are plain ignoring the head shots TLaw has taken and how it may affect him going forward just go back and rewatch. This game and multiple hits he took vs LSU.
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [489]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 520
Joined: 9/27/14
|
Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE... ***
Jan 14, 2020, 1:50 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [840]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 2112
Joined: 9/27/08
|
Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE...
Jan 14, 2020, 12:48 AM
|
|
The real problem I have is that neither you nor I has ever seen targeting called without a helmet to helmet hit. Regardless of what the rule may or may not be interpreted as...none of us has seen it called...for this to be the first time, is unfortunate timing...the review to find it was due to the big hit...also the Higgins TD, Simmons being hugged as burrow ran off his hip for a TD.
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16207]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13076
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Go to bed and sleep it off!***
Jan 14, 2020, 12:51 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Cub [10]
TigerPulse: 35%
Posts: 47
Joined: 1/12/20
|
Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE...
Jan 14, 2020, 1:14 AM
|
|
Are you going to ignore 628 yard given up by your Defense 42 points given up. Venable is a good coordinator but he couldn't cook up a plan to stop the best O college football has ever seen.
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [171]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 258
Joined: 8/17/09
|
Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE...
Jan 14, 2020, 1:17 AM
|
|
You right^^^^
Happy game wasn't decided by the referees.
Great win LSU Tigers. Congratulations!
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [632]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 930
Joined: 9/16/14
|
He probably did good enough
Jan 14, 2020, 1:43 AM
[ in reply to Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE... ] |
|
Had our offense done better it would have been a ballgame. Most of us knew LSU offense would put up points, it was just a matter of keeping pace with our own offense which could have happened but they came out flat for the most part. Never seen TL throw so bad, and ETN was successful running the ball, even up the middle, but they didn’t stay with it.
Too many 3 and outs gave you all those yards but you played well with your chances
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [956]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 1559
Joined: 6/4/12
|
Re: He probably did good enough
Jan 14, 2020, 1:53 AM
|
|
Rumor is headshots to the QB may affect play.
Look LSU won congrats on a magical season.
But I’ve witnessed uncalled targeting two games in a row vs TLaw who could be a future #1.
The only time it was called vs osu was because he stayed down.
But “gosh gee I just don’t know why he seemed off on throws he completes easily”.
10-4 roger that...
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2189]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1734
Joined: 4/8/99
|
Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE...
Jan 14, 2020, 6:55 AM
|
|
Look through the windshield, not the rear view mirror. . .time to move on!
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1640]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 1742
Joined: 11/30/04
|
Sorry... but you will have to get over it.
Jan 14, 2020, 9:02 AM
|
|
We will be back next year and we will win the whole thing.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1405]
TigerPulse: 93%
Posts: 1451
Joined: 9/2/05
|
Re: ARE WE JUST GOING TO IGNORE...
Jan 14, 2020, 9:44 AM
|
|
Yes I will be ignoring your stupid comments. Rodgers not targeted and Skalski did target get over it
|
|
|
|
Replies: 40
| visibility 1
|
|
|