|
Replies: 12
| visibility 1
|
Orange Blooded [2989]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 7583
Joined: 7/19/01
|
|
|
|
 |
Heisman Winner [111618]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 73767
Joined: 9/10/03
|
Re: NBC Sports: Was Duke's Hood fouled by Clemson? *L*
Mar 15, 2014, 2:32 AM
|
|
Looks like a foul.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2989]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 7583
Joined: 7/19/01
|
Stops dribbling, grimaces, runs into KJ and falls
Mar 15, 2014, 2:40 AM
|
|
Looks like a fall.
Point is should have been a no-call just like the other ones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15526]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 21417
Joined: 9/24/07
|
Re: NBC Sports: Was Duke's Hood fouled by Clemson? *L*
Mar 15, 2014, 7:49 AM
[ in reply to Re: NBC Sports: Was Duke's Hood fouled by Clemson? *L* ] |
|
The replay looks more like a patented "Duke Flop" rather than a foul, but I expect no better calls against them or against UNC. Those teams always seem to get the benefit of the doubt when we play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2989]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 7583
Joined: 7/19/01
|
Yep. Regardless, officials don't have to decide the end of
Mar 15, 2014, 2:05 PM
|
|
close games, unless it's an obvious call.
Let them play it out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2989]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 7583
Joined: 7/19/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6681]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 9739
Joined: 9/22/11
|
You do "look like a foul" - here is the real answer:
Mar 16, 2014, 7:37 PM
[ in reply to Re: NBC Sports: Was Duke's Hood fouled by Clemson? *L* ] |
|
It looks to me like the Duke player covered up the ball and bulldozed into the Clemson player. The contact was initiated by the Duke player who seems to be out of control of where he is going like he lost his footing. If there was any foul here it should have been on the Duke player, not the Clemson player. This was an extremely bad call, particularly to have decide a game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [927]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1379
Joined: 11/13/05
|
I say No foul.
Mar 15, 2014, 8:06 AM
|
|
But remember it's Duke. Dookies ALWAYS get those calls.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2989]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 7583
Joined: 7/19/01
|
Not even sure why he blew a whistle. Ref was behind players.
Mar 15, 2014, 2:10 PM
|
|
No call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [7]
TigerPulse: 93%
Posts: 18
Joined: 7/11/01
|
Re: Not even sure why he blew a whistle. Ref was behind players.
Mar 15, 2014, 2:19 PM
|
|
He probably heard Coach "K"holler foul, foul!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2989]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 7583
Joined: 7/19/01
|
Re: Not even sure why he blew a whistle. Ref was behind players.
Mar 16, 2014, 6:11 PM
|
|
or most likely the recurring voice of Jamie Dixon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7831]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 20489
Joined: 10/9/04
|
Why didn't the writer mention the
Mar 16, 2014, 7:28 PM
|
|
No call at other end of floor?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6681]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 9739
Joined: 9/22/11
|
he didn't have to mention it as he was proving that Hood was
Mar 16, 2014, 7:39 PM
|
|
not fouled - so game should have been over as Tigers would have had ball or even most agree that Hood fouled K. J., so K. J. could have been shooting with the Tigers leading and almost no time left - "It looks to me like the Duke player covered up the ball and bulldozed into the Clemson player. The contact was initiated by the Duke player who seems to be out of control of where he is going like he lost his footing. If there was any foul here it should have been on the Duke player, not the Clemson player. This was an extremely bad call, particularly to have decide a game."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 12
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
