Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Next, SCOTUS will review whether
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 36
| visibility 450

Next, SCOTUS will review whether


Jun 26, 2015, 12:13 PM

people have the right to fall upwards, finally testing the legitimacy of the existing laws of gravity.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Next, SCOTUS will review whether


Jun 26, 2015, 12:17 PM

So are you fundamentally opposed to the ability to amend the law?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

No...just amused at the thought of the SCOTUS


Jun 26, 2015, 12:22 PM

making a "decision" about something as incontrovertible as marriage.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of


Jun 26, 2015, 12:31 PM

of religion." "No state shall...deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

except for felons


Jun 26, 2015, 1:53 PM

and a few other people. Minorities get a few extra rights and more free stuff too.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


very revealing post.


Jun 26, 2015, 2:00 PM

but not surprising.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Where you been...?***


Jun 26, 2015, 2:22 PM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Observing.


Jun 26, 2015, 2:33 PM

:)

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Slowly...?***


Jun 26, 2015, 2:51 PM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Incontrovertible done been controverted.***


Jun 26, 2015, 12:36 PM [ in reply to No...just amused at the thought of the SCOTUS ]



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


....


Jun 26, 2015, 1:25 PM [ in reply to No...just amused at the thought of the SCOTUS ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Touche...let's go with immutable.***


Jun 26, 2015, 1:53 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Immutable done been muted.


Jun 26, 2015, 2:05 PM

Wait, wut?

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


or rule that racism no longer exists in this country.


Jun 26, 2015, 12:21 PM

Oops. They already did that.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It doesn't?


Jun 26, 2015, 12:30 PM

Good to hear. Might want to inform everyone in the country about it though

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

in other news...Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton file for....


Jun 26, 2015, 12:34 PM

bankruptcy.

Wait...no they don't...they just remembered that they can make-up racism as-needed for income.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Shelby County vs. Holder.


Jun 26, 2015, 12:40 PM [ in reply to It doesn't? ]

That's what the majority, led by Roberts, suggested with their verdict.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Like I said, good to hear.


Jun 26, 2015, 12:41 PM

Now people can stop complaining about racism since it doesn't exist anymore

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Next, SCOTUS will review whether


Jun 26, 2015, 12:41 PM

Our laws govern every single one of the 10 Commandments.

It's illegal to murder, to steal, and to bear false witness.

Our laws specifically grant the right to have other gods before Yahweh and worship false idols (like Yahweh).

Adultery is grounds for divorce, and parents have custodial rights over children.

Why is it such lunacy that the laws would also govern who can get married, a topic not covered in the Big Ten?

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: like a man, who hath thought of a good repartee when the discourse is changed, or the company parted; or like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.
- Jonathan Swift


'cept the SCOTUS just said that legislatures don't hold....


Jun 26, 2015, 12:45 PM

the power to govern who gets married. The law's they created are moot now.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

That's not a special case.


Jun 26, 2015, 12:50 PM

Legislatures also can't stop you from worshiping false idols.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: like a man, who hath thought of a good repartee when the discourse is changed, or the company parted; or like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.
- Jonathan Swift


No they can't....mainly because there's a right on that....


Jun 26, 2015, 12:52 PM

actually given in the Constitution.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Your argument is shifting.


Jun 26, 2015, 1:39 PM

You now appear to agree that our laws govern the Big Ten, which is what I said.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: like a man, who hath thought of a good repartee when the discourse is changed, or the company parted; or like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.
- Jonathan Swift


What is shifting with my argument? Did you confuse me....


Jun 26, 2015, 5:39 PM

with someone else?

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: What is shifting with my argument? Did you confuse me....


Jun 28, 2015, 2:11 PM

Nope, it was you. Here's the subthread in a nutshell.

1) I said our laws govern stuff from the Ten Commandments. <-- this was my original point.

2) You said yes but "the SCOTUS just said that legislatures don't hold the power to govern who gets married. The law's they created are moot now." <-- this was your counterargument

3) Then I pointed out that the same is true for other laws too, such as laws respecting religion. <-- this point directly addresses your counterargument.

4) Then you pretend the original point never existed, and started arguing about which laws are in the Constitution. <-- this is your argument shifting, because you're no longer addressing (1) above.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: like a man, who hath thought of a good repartee when the discourse is changed, or the company parted; or like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.
- Jonathan Swift


The court ruled that religous dogma is insufficient reason


Jun 26, 2015, 12:57 PM [ in reply to 'cept the SCOTUS just said that legislatures don't hold.... ]

to deny equal protection under the law.

They had no choice. The Constitution requires it.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"religious dogma" lol***


Jun 26, 2015, 1:01 PM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Lulz... No


Jun 26, 2015, 1:06 PM [ in reply to The court ruled that religous dogma is insufficient reason ]

The court's ruling had nothing to do with "religious dogma"

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Is there another reason to oppose gay marriage than


Jun 26, 2015, 1:21 PM

a primarily Christian religious argument, which The Court ruled is insufficient reason to deny equal protection under the law?

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Oh boy, here we go.***


Jun 26, 2015, 1:26 PM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-19b.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You obviously paid no attention to the case


Jun 26, 2015, 7:21 PM [ in reply to Is there another reason to oppose gay marriage than ]

Those defending traditional marriage weren't making arguments in front of SCOTUS based on "religious dogma." All you'd have to do to inform yourself is go read the dissent, but most people won't because it's easier to dismiss traditional marriage if you just ignore all that and believe it's all about religion.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You need to pad that rocker... It won't hurt as much.***


Jun 26, 2015, 7:25 PM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


They couldn't argue a purely religious based case and win.


Jun 26, 2015, 7:36 PM [ in reply to You obviously paid no attention to the case ]

Everybody understands the true origin of the opposition to gay marriage. Fortunately, the majority did not buy the charade.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

They also don't have the right to legislate against BJs


Jun 26, 2015, 1:03 PM [ in reply to 'cept the SCOTUS just said that legislatures don't hold.... ]

Which, strangely enough, they have in the past on religious grounds.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Thou shalt not covet thy neighbors wife.


Jun 26, 2015, 12:59 PM [ in reply to Re: Next, SCOTUS will review whether ]

I am going to prison?

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Probably, but not for that.


Jun 26, 2015, 1:45 PM

Our law prohibits legislatures from passing criminal laws where the only thing at issue is the person's thoughts.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: like a man, who hath thought of a good repartee when the discourse is changed, or the company parted; or like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.
- Jonathan Swift


Are you applying for the license?


Jun 26, 2015, 12:44 PM

If you start falling the wrong way without paying a tax I'm sure you'll end up in court.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 36
| visibility 450
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic