Replies: 15
| visibility 1
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
Three weeks in, most non-conference games are complete.
Sep 18, 2017, 7:37 AM
|
|
Here are how the conferences are performing in terms of W/L:
All non-conference games:
SEC: 26-6, .813 PAC-12: 26-7, .788 Big Ten: 29-8, .784 ACC: 22-9, .710 Big 12: 19-10, .655 American: 18-10, .643 MAC: 18-17, .514 C-USA: 16-20, .444 MWC: 15-19, .441 Indep.: 5-9, .357 Sun Belt: 9-18, .333
"Power 5" non-conference games:
PAC-12: 6-2, .750 Big Ten: 7-5, .583 SEC: 5-6, .455 Big 12: 4-6, .400 ACC: 5-8, .385 American: 3-8, .273 MAC: 4-12, .250 MWC: 3-14, .176 Indep.: 1-5, .167 C-USA: 2-13, .133 Sun Belt: 0-9, .000
"Group of 5" non-conference games:
SEC: 10-0, 1.000 American: 9-1, .900 ACC: 8-1, .889 Big Ten: 20-3, .870 Big 12: 9-3, .750 PAC-12: 8-5, .615 MAC: 5-4, .556 MWC: 3-3, .500 C-USA: 5-6, .455 Indep.: 2-4, .333 Sun Belt: 2-7, .222
FCS games:
SEC: 11-0, 1.000 ACC: 9-0, 1.000 PAC-12: 8-0, 1.000 Big Ten: 2-0, 1.000 Indep.: 2-0, 1.000 C-USA: 9-1, .900 MAC: 9-1, .900 Big 12: 6-1, .857 American: 6-1, .857 MWC: 9-2, .818 Sun Belt: 7-2, .778
Sample size is still to small for there to be a good rating, but after 3 weeks of games, it's the Big Ten with a sizeable advantage over the SEC. After that, PAC-12, Big 12, ACC.
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
Almost all of the remaining Power 5 OOC games
Sep 18, 2017, 7:52 AM
|
|
Are either Notre Dame games, or ACC/SEC matchups at the end of the year:
Week 4: Syracuse/LSU Notre Dame/Michigan St.
Week 6: Notre Dame/North Carolina
Week 8: USC/Notre Dame
Week 9: NC State/Notre Dame
Week 10: Wake Forest/Notre Dame
Week 11 Notre Dame/Miami
Week 13: Florida St./Florida Clemson/South Carolina Georgia/Georgia Tech Louisville/Kentucky Notre Dame/Stanford
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [54011]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 21055
Joined: 11/6/14
|
I no longer respect your rankings after Clemson won the championship last year...
Sep 18, 2017, 8:21 AM
|
|
and didn't finish first in your rankings.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [35541]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14328
Joined: 4/7/17
|
Pretty much this***
Sep 18, 2017, 8:28 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105590]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 65204
Joined: 12/2/02
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [81061]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 56140
Joined: 9/13/04
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
Pretty simple, really. Alabama's scoring margin
Sep 18, 2017, 10:56 AM
|
|
for the season was sufficiently greater than Clemson's, so that the total rating had Alabama higher. I didn't particularly like the result, myself, but it is what it is.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [54011]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 21055
Joined: 11/6/14
|
Yeah but you didn't take into consideration...
Sep 18, 2017, 10:58 AM
|
|
Alabama scored those points against soft SEC defenses or that they lost the head to head against the real #1 team.
YOUR ALGORITHMS NEED BETTER ALGORITHMS.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
There is obviously no head-to-head component...
Sep 18, 2017, 11:00 AM
|
|
There can't be in a holistic mathematical rating. That's why we don't determine champions with holistic mathematical ratings.
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22331]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7576
Joined: 3/3/99
|
Re: Pretty simple, really. Alabama's scoring margin
Sep 18, 2017, 11:32 AM
[ in reply to Pretty simple, really. Alabama's scoring margin ] |
|
Just curious... why Scoring Margin as the determining factor? There are any number of equally irrelevant statistics... time of possession, total yards, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
It's by far the easiest thing to use...
Sep 18, 2017, 12:14 PM
|
|
If you want to go one step beyond W/L, which I wanted to do.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [38191]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13250
Joined: 5/21/13
|
Cool man. How's the rectum recovering?
Sep 18, 2017, 7:56 AM
|
|
b/c KY WENT IN DRY.
WHICH IS IRONIC BECAUSE KY IS ALSO A BRAND OF LUBE.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
There won't be an individual team rating 'til next week.
Sep 18, 2017, 8:01 AM
|
|
Thanks to Irma, a couple of teams in Florida haven't played enough games to make a rating work. I'm dividing by zero through week three.
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [135609]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 91640
Joined: 12/6/98
|
Good to have you back, old friend!
Sep 18, 2017, 9:28 AM
|
|
And, I'm going to save you some time. I think we ALL already know who the best team in the country is right now.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
I know who I'd put #1. We'll see how the #s pan out.***
Sep 18, 2017, 10:58 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 1
|
|
|