Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Three weeks in, most non-conference games are complete.
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 15
| visibility 1

Three weeks in, most non-conference games are complete.


Sep 18, 2017, 7:37 AM

Here are how the conferences are performing in terms of W/L:

All non-conference games:

SEC: 26-6, .813
PAC-12: 26-7, .788
Big Ten: 29-8, .784
ACC: 22-9, .710
Big 12: 19-10, .655
American: 18-10, .643
MAC: 18-17, .514
C-USA: 16-20, .444
MWC: 15-19, .441
Indep.: 5-9, .357
Sun Belt: 9-18, .333


"Power 5" non-conference games:

PAC-12: 6-2, .750
Big Ten: 7-5, .583
SEC: 5-6, .455
Big 12: 4-6, .400
ACC: 5-8, .385
American: 3-8, .273
MAC: 4-12, .250
MWC: 3-14, .176
Indep.: 1-5, .167
C-USA: 2-13, .133
Sun Belt: 0-9, .000


"Group of 5" non-conference games:

SEC: 10-0, 1.000
American: 9-1, .900
ACC: 8-1, .889
Big Ten: 20-3, .870
Big 12: 9-3, .750
PAC-12: 8-5, .615
MAC: 5-4, .556
MWC: 3-3, .500
C-USA: 5-6, .455
Indep.: 2-4, .333
Sun Belt: 2-7, .222


FCS games:

SEC: 11-0, 1.000
ACC: 9-0, 1.000
PAC-12: 8-0, 1.000
Big Ten: 2-0, 1.000
Indep.: 2-0, 1.000
C-USA: 9-1, .900
MAC: 9-1, .900
Big 12: 6-1, .857
American: 6-1, .857
MWC: 9-2, .818
Sun Belt: 7-2, .778


Sample size is still to small for there to be a good rating, but after 3 weeks of games, it's the Big Ten with a sizeable advantage over the SEC. After that, PAC-12, Big 12, ACC.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Almost all of the remaining Power 5 OOC games


Sep 18, 2017, 7:52 AM

Are either Notre Dame games, or ACC/SEC matchups at the end of the year:

Week 4:
Syracuse/LSU
Notre Dame/Michigan St.

Week 6:
Notre Dame/North Carolina

Week 8:
USC/Notre Dame

Week 9:
NC State/Notre Dame

Week 10:
Wake Forest/Notre Dame

Week 11
Notre Dame/Miami

Week 13:
Florida St./Florida
Clemson/South Carolina
Georgia/Georgia Tech
Louisville/Kentucky
Notre Dame/Stanford

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I no longer respect your rankings after Clemson won the championship last year...


Sep 18, 2017, 8:21 AM

and didn't finish first in your rankings.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Pretty much this***


Sep 18, 2017, 8:28 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


That's OK.***


Sep 18, 2017, 9:09 AM [ in reply to I no longer respect your rankings after Clemson won the championship last year... ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I NEVER RESPECTED HIS SEC-BIAS RANKINGS CAUSE HE IS A COOT


Sep 18, 2017, 9:16 AM [ in reply to I no longer respect your rankings after Clemson won the championship last year... ]

GO TIGERS!




-PhD

2024 purple level memberringofhonor-greenr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yeah, I'm still not sure how that was possible***


Sep 18, 2017, 9:24 AM [ in reply to I no longer respect your rankings after Clemson won the championship last year... ]



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Pretty simple, really. Alabama's scoring margin


Sep 18, 2017, 10:56 AM

for the season was sufficiently greater than Clemson's, so that the total rating had Alabama higher. I didn't particularly like the result, myself, but it is what it is.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yeah but you didn't take into consideration...


Sep 18, 2017, 10:58 AM

Alabama scored those points against soft SEC defenses or that they lost the head to head against the real #1 team.

YOUR ALGORITHMS NEED BETTER ALGORITHMS.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There is obviously no head-to-head component...


Sep 18, 2017, 11:00 AM

There can't be in a holistic mathematical rating. That's why we don't determine champions with holistic mathematical ratings.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Pretty simple, really. Alabama's scoring margin


Sep 18, 2017, 11:32 AM [ in reply to Pretty simple, really. Alabama's scoring margin ]

Just curious... why Scoring Margin as the determining factor? There are any number of equally irrelevant statistics... time of possession, total yards, etc.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

smoking cigarettes and writing something nasty on the wall


It's by far the easiest thing to use...


Sep 18, 2017, 12:14 PM

If you want to go one step beyond W/L, which I wanted to do.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Cool man. How's the rectum recovering?


Sep 18, 2017, 7:56 AM

b/c KY WENT IN DRY.

WHICH IS IRONIC BECAUSE KY IS ALSO A BRAND OF LUBE.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There won't be an individual team rating 'til next week.


Sep 18, 2017, 8:01 AM

Thanks to Irma, a couple of teams in Florida haven't played enough games to make a rating work. I'm dividing by zero through week three.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Good to have you back, old friend!


Sep 18, 2017, 9:28 AM

And, I'm going to save you some time. I think we ALL already know who the best team in the country is right now.




ringofhonor-rhtig.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


I know who I'd put #1. We'll see how the #s pan out.***


Sep 18, 2017, 10:58 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 15
| visibility 1
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic