Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
I haven't seen many question why the BCS formula had
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 4
| visibility 1

I haven't seen many question why the BCS formula had


Dec 2, 2012, 12:44 AM

Alabama and Georgia as 2 and 3, respectively. Oregon and Florida both have a strong argument for having better resumes. Florida definitely has more quality wins and its only loss to UGA. Oregon lost a close game to Stanford as its only loss.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Because of the human voters.


Dec 2, 2012, 12:28 PM

The computers had UF #2, Bama #3, UGA #4, and Oregon #5, but the gap b/t Bama, UGA, and Oregon was really close. Florida was in 2nd by a mile.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I haven't seen many question why the BCS formula had


Dec 17, 2021, 1:09 PM

You could make a good case for Florida,but we all know that Oregon is not in the eSECpn.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: I haven't seen many question why the BCS formula had


Dec 2, 2012, 7:14 AM

That and they haven't played anybody but three teams maybe

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The goal of the BCS is to find No 1 and No 2.***


Dec 2, 2012, 9:00 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 4
| visibility 1
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Hill Watch...129 days!!!

by O.J.

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic