»
Topic: If we have to go 12-1 cause of SOS
Replies: 32   Last Post: Jul 1, 2012 4:20 PM by: wildblulou®
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 32  

If we have to go 12-1 cause of SOS

[1]
Posted: Jun 28, 2012 11:27 PM
 

To get over a 10-2 SEC team or Big 12 wouldn't it be easier to do the 12-1 with the easier schedule than 10-2 vs tougher schedule? If you're all worried cause we have to go 12-1 cause of Sos then what makes you think we can do 10-2 in harder schedule? Just don't get this, we shouldn't have to go 11-1,12-1 to get over 10-2 sec team. Shouldn't we if the schedule is easier


Message was edited by: Bryanttiger®



  What is easier to do    [Results]
 
12 -1 in ACC
10-2 SEC or Big 12
military_donation.jpg

Unless you have Georgia's schedule in sec***

[1]
Posted: Jun 28, 2012 11:31 PM
 



military_donation.jpg

haha POINT! Nice default there!***

[1]
Posted: Jun 29, 2012 9:21 AM
 




I suppose ther will always be those who just want Cheerwine

[3]
Posted: Jun 29, 2012 7:57 AM
 

even though Coke and Pepsi still rule.

If you don't understand what I mean, don't worry about it.

badge-donor-10yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg

John 3:16; 14:1-6


Since when was the big 12 elite?

[1]
Posted: Jun 29, 2012 8:21 AM
 

ok, oklahoma should be pretty good this year. wvu will be good but will probably have growing pains in the new conference all other teams should be average.


it's still better than the Pac 12, Big 10, ACC, etc.***


Posted: Jun 29, 2012 8:34 AM
 




Re: Since when was the big 12 elite?

[1]
Posted: Jun 29, 2012 8:36 AM
 

You mean the conference that was almost extinct just 1 year ago and has no full time commish

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

I'm sure the Stanford AD would leave his job for something

[1]
Posted: Jun 29, 2012 8:44 AM
 

about to fall apart today

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Re: Since when was the big 12 elite?

[1]
Posted: Jul 1, 2012 2:57 PM
 

The Big 12 has made a complete 180 compared to last year, IMO. Yes the conference was on the brink of folding with the loss of A&M and Mizzou, with the additional rumors of OU, OSU, Texas, and TT leaving for another conference. I think what saved the Big 12 is that the remaining members met and decided to stick it out and make the best of it. I keep hearing from a lot of people that "why would you want to join the Big 12 when they are not stable?" The truth is that they are the opposite...they are stable at this point in time. "Well how can you say that"? Well, if they were about to fold, why would TCU and WVU join the conference? Yes, I know that they are two teams that would be hard to replace Nebraska and A&M but they are two solid football schools that has played very well over the last few years and has been focused on getting better. The second point is why are espn working huge tv deal if they are going to tank? As far as the commish, why would he leave from Stanford and being in a stable conference to go to a dying conference?

Now I'm not saying that the Big 12 is right up there with the SEC or Big 10 but I would say they are the 4th best conference out there.

military_donation.jpg

Re: Since when was the big 12 elite?


Posted: Jul 1, 2012 4:03 PM
 

I couldn't agree with you more. IMO, I do believe that Clemson and FSU would have made the B12 a much stronger conference. Also Clemson as in FB, I think we are a better program than ND. ND gets to pick who they play and mostly where they want them in their schedule. And they still have 8/4 seasons. I feel sure that is why Texas would rather have ND over us. Clemson could and would be a pain in the Texass. Regardless of what some say or think about Dabo Swinney. He is turning 20 years of sucky FB around for the better.

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg


it's not about which is easier

[2]
Posted: Jun 29, 2012 8:36 AM
 

it's about the ACC lacking respect (and with good reason). the better question is

11-1 in ACC or 10-2 in SEC/Big 12: Which one would people think is more impressive?


Thank you...


Posted: Jun 29, 2012 8:38 AM
 

Is it easier to go 12-0 in ACC or 11-1 in SEC or Big 12.....def the latter. It is hard to go undefeated in ANY CONFERENCE due to the mental aspect of it....

easier to go 11-1 in ACC or 10-2 in SEC or Big12....about the same, but the latter gives a better chance at jumping other 10-2 or even 11-1 teams...

2020 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg


if it is all about perception and your perception is that


Posted: Jun 29, 2012 8:48 AM
 

they are "about the same" then why do you think people will find one more impressive than the other?

If people think they are "about the same", then they will weigh them "about the same." If they weigh them, "about the same", then they will think of them as "about the same."
If they think of 11-1 in ACC as "about the same" as 10-2 in SEC, then 11-1 in ACC = 10-2 in SEC. In that case there is just as good a chance of the ACC team being in over the SEC team. 50-50 odds is a dumb reason to make huge changes and risk of instability.


Re: if it is all about perception and your perception is that


Posted: Jun 29, 2012 8:52 AM
 

I didn't say anyone weighed them the same....I said going 11-1 in ACC or 10-2 in SEC or Big12 is about the same IN DIFFICULTY....

The perception for the longest time has been a bias towards those conference and against the ACC. Why in years when 2 loss teams made the top 4 like 2006, 2005 and 2003 you had teams with less wins and the same losses way ahead of ACC teams in the rankings....

2020 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg


EVERYTHING


Posted: Jun 29, 2012 8:49 AM
 

is relative to the re cord of the other 119 teams.

To argue 13-0 vs 12-1 vs 10-2 vs 11-2 is fruitless unless you know what the records for the other teams are and when and against who the losses are.

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

null


Exactly what our point is....


Posted: Jun 29, 2012 8:54 AM
 

And the ACC schedule, especially when the 9 game conf kicks in and other conferences stop scheduling tough OOC games, will not be enough to jump teams playing Bama, LSU, Ark, FLa, UGA etc....or Texas, OK, OKSt. TT, TCU, WV etc....

2020 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg


Re: it's not about which is easier


Posted: Jun 29, 2012 2:36 PM
 

No the question is I. REALITY what is more likely to happen?

military_donation.jpg

Re: If we have to go 12-1 cause of SOS


Posted: Jun 29, 2012 8:36 AM
 

Come on man, why are you trying to manipulate the poll? 12-1 over 10-2? No one has ever made that argument.....not once....11-1 to 10-2, yes....come on man...

2020 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg


He is the "Dabo's great!" and "Stay in ACC, just win"

[2]
Posted: Jun 29, 2012 2:24 PM
 

postinest person there is.

There should be rules about starting thread after thread after thread about the same topic wihtout at least coming at it from a different perspective.


Re: He is the "Dabo's great!" and "Stay in ACC, just win"

[1]
Posted: Jul 1, 2012 12:36 PM
 

Dabo is great (for the time being) and 'just win,' will work if we can just, WIN.

However, though I believe the ACC is the place to be until the playoff starts, I don't like the low pay and lighter SOS. I'm not all in with the ACC so don't lump everyone who like Dabo's recruiting of players and coordinators, moral attitude, and coach's training wheels in the same bunch with the 'ACC, ACC, ACC,' crowd.

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Re: He is the "Dabo's great!" and "Stay in ACC, just win"

[1]
Posted: Jul 1, 2012 4:06 PM
 

Point earned!!!

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg


Why do we play an extra game in the ACC

[1]
Posted: Jun 29, 2012 8:50 AM
 

I'm assuming in the ACC you make it to the title game at 11-1 and you don't in the SEC at 10-2?

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg


Re: Why do we play an extra game in the ACC


Posted: Jun 29, 2012 8:56 AM
 

He's trying to spin the argument in his favor....by starting a different argument with different factors...

2020 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg


No im not, 11-1 would be ACC title game and just


Posted: Jun 29, 2012 2:39 PM
 

Assuming we win. 10-2 in the sec more then likely won't win sec.

military_donation.jpg

Re: Since when was the big 12 elite?


Posted: Jun 29, 2012 9:00 AM
 

Yeah and Venanbles couldn't stop them with 5 stars. We expect him to do it with 3?

military_donation.jpg

Change "easier" to "what's the better perception"***


Posted: Jun 29, 2012 1:01 PM
 



badge-donor-05yr.jpg

THE TIGERS ARE IN MY HEART..... BUT THE DUCKS ARE IN MY PANTS....


I think the difficulty level is the same


Posted: Jun 29, 2012 1:35 PM
 

I'd sort of prefer 10-2 in the Big12 or SEC because that means there are more big games every year and less matchups with mediocre to bad teams.


Reading that gave me a headache.***


Posted: Jun 29, 2012 2:15 PM
 



2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg


Re: EVERYTHING


Posted: Jul 1, 2012 11:17 AM
 

How about 12-1 with a season ending loss to ###?


Re: If we have to go 12-1 cause of SOS


Posted: Jul 1, 2012 11:22 AM
 

I don't care which one is easier...which one pays us more????...because bottom line its all about money to survive and be a winning program in college football


Re: If we have to go 12-1 cause of SOS


Posted: Jul 1, 2012 3:43 PM
 

http://www.tigernet.com/forums/message.jspa?messageID=12406126

military_donation.jpg

Player tougher competition pays us more. More people watch


Posted: Jul 1, 2012 4:20 PM
 

and care on both sides and outside.

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Stronger schedules make stronger teams. Better games =


Posted: Jul 1, 2012 4:18 PM
 

bigger crowds. What's to stop the three top teams in the league from going 11-1 one season, where FSU, Va. Tech and us all swap a loss and all beat Ga. Tech, Pitt, BC and Miami like we ought to? Plus the three games in the other division?

I'd like a stronger schedule not so much for SOS as for the extra excitement and prestige of Saturdays in Death Valley. We'd also get an extra home game a year, or two even if we punked out on a quality OOC for an extra homer. That's serious revenue for Clemson, big time, as it is for Va. Tech and FSU, plus any program that was playing more competitive football. The increase in SOS is really just a by-product of the arrangement.

A stronger schedule would provide significant financial resources in addition to more exciting games overall, with a minimum of 7 home games each year.

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Replies: 32  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: Season Tickets
FOR SALE: 4 in Sec UO row K and a Lot 5 parking pass number 5579 asking 8500 for the package, email if intere...

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
3378 people have read this post