|
Replies: 15
| visibility 2,078
|
Legend [16733]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16763
Joined: 8/19/04
|
Brad is not the winningest basketball coach in Clemson's
Feb 4, 2020, 6:49 AM
|
|
|
|
history. He is in conference wins but not overall wins.
He is 3rd for most wins and 3rd for moist losses.
|
|
|
|
 |
Heisman Winner [140536]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33873
Joined: 12/5/10
|
“moist losses”?***
Feb 4, 2020, 6:51 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4365]
TigerPulse: 80%
Posts: 8370
Joined: 1/4/17
|
Re: “moist losses”?***
Feb 4, 2020, 7:20 AM
|
|
They make me cry !
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [96870]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 29215
Joined: 9/14/05
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [82066]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 17309
Joined: 1/14/17
|
Re: I recommend he buy some
Feb 4, 2020, 11:47 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [67848]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 115477
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: “moist losses”?
Feb 4, 2020, 7:45 AM
[ in reply to “moist losses”?*** ] |
|
sounds bad. Maybe get some Depends
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [65503]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33274
Joined: 12/3/03
|
Is that in any way related to Coot coach Moistcramps?
Feb 4, 2020, 10:44 AM
[ in reply to “moist losses”?*** ] |
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [48078]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 49059
Joined: 5/16/04
|
Re: Brad is not the winningest basketball coach in Clemson's
Feb 4, 2020, 6:51 AM
|
|
At least the losses are moist. Those losses are easier to swallow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5808]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5375
Joined: 9/5/10
|
Re: Brad is not the winningest basketball coach in Clemson's
Feb 4, 2020, 6:58 AM
|
|
Losing is bad enough, but a moist loss is the worst kind of loss. Nobody should have to endure a moist loss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [48078]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 49059
Joined: 5/16/04
|
Re: Brad is not the winningest basketball coach in Clemson's
Feb 4, 2020, 7:02 AM
|
|
The losses taste like banana bread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4596]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3360
Joined: 8/14/01
|
Re: Brad is not the winningest basketball coach in Clemson's
Feb 4, 2020, 7:01 AM
|
|
Don't know where you got that data...it seems way out of date, like two years out-of-date
2010–11 Clemson 22–12 9–7 T–4th NCAA Division I Round of 64
2011–12 Clemson 16–15 8–8 7th
2012–13 Clemson 13–18 5–13 11th
2013–14 Clemson 23–13 10–8 6th NIT Semifinal
2014–15 Clemson 16–15 8–10 T–9th
2015–16 Clemson 17–14 10–8 T–7th
2016–17 Clemson 17–16 6–12 12th NIT First Round
2017–18 Clemson 25–10 11–7 T–3rd NCAA Division I Sweet 16
2018–19 Clemson 20–14 9–9 T–8th NIT Second Round
2019–20 Clemson 11–9 5–5
Clemson: 180–136 (.570) 81–87 (.482)
I think even this data is one game out-of-date and should be 11-10, 5-6 and 180-137 (81-88) overall.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [48078]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 49059
Joined: 5/16/04
|
Re: Brad is not the winningest basketball coach in Clemson's
Feb 4, 2020, 7:03 AM
|
|
Are those losses moist? That could be the difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16733]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16763
Joined: 8/19/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [83625]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 63724
Joined: 12/31/06
|
Moist of the people in this thread are loosers***
Feb 4, 2020, 7:28 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Brad is not the winningest basketball coach in Clemson's
Feb 4, 2020, 7:34 AM
|
|
Moist losses are best taken with a grade of slaw.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13038]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22360
Joined: 4/24/04
|
Accumulation stats are dumb anyway
Feb 4, 2020, 8:59 AM
|
|
The biggest achievement there is managing to stay tenured for 10 seasons. It's the same with athletes that manage to play for ~20 years. Congrats for staying healthy and contributing for a long time, but I'm much more interested in efficiency stats and how good players were at their peak.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 2,078
|
|
|
50
