I don't know how many - or if any - of the A&M flops were legitimate, but they did seem to come at times where it was advantageous to A&M. It seemed to me more like Clemson's players were just better conditioned for the heat, humidity and pace. I haven't seen how many played for A&M compared to Clemson, but it could be that we just wore 'em out with better rotations.
Whether the A&M flops were legitimate or not, one thing is undeniable...... they got their butts whipped!