»
Topic: Tiger Receivers Open Deep?
Replies: 5   Last Post: Dec 30, 2019, 11:49 AM by: Noodle
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 5  

Tiger Receivers Open Deep?


Posted: Dec 30, 2019, 10:32 AM
 

Great game for sure. Great TV coverage. Question- On several views from behind Trevor it looked like he had a receiver open deep but had to dump it off to a receiver in the flat or short field. Hard to tell for sure from the TV. So my question is to those fortunate to witness the game, were there receivers open deep and TL just didn't have time to throw to them? Thanks. Go Tigers!

link

Re: Tiger Receivers Open Deep?


Posted: Dec 30, 2019, 10:44 AM
 

Noticed the same. Suspect the deep receivers were his last ones to check and never got to them based on the pass rush. Makes sense. If there is a big pass rush - should be easier throws closer in.

link

Re: Tiger Receivers Open Deep?


Posted: Dec 30, 2019, 11:18 AM
 

Saw those too. I love the low camera angle behind the qb. Lets you see how tough it is to fit the ball in there at times.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgringofhonor-74tiger.jpg link

Re: Tiger Receivers Open Deep?


Posted: Dec 30, 2019, 11:29 AM
 

Yea I noticed one free TD to Rodgers that TL missed by throwing to the crossing route instead. Rodgers was wide open.

link

Re: Tiger Receivers Open Deep?


Posted: Dec 30, 2019, 11:35 AM
 

Tee was wide open on the Rodgers one on last drive. And he wanted the ball too.

link

Re: Tiger Receivers Open Deep?


Posted: Dec 30, 2019, 11:49 AM
 

We have the benefit of watching without 300 lb defenders coming to kill us. Trevor can’t see everything in the 3 seconds he has. Yes there were some wide open receivers that got missed but I think he did pretty well.

link

Replies: 5  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: Season Tickets
FOR SALE: 2 Great seats in lower deck. Section Q row NN. $1050 each

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
1365 people have read this post