Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
When you really look at the numbers, we really only need about 3-4 portal
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic
Replies: 19
| visibility 901

When you really look at the numbers, we really only need about 3-4 portal

2

Nov 30, 2023, 11:48 AM
Reply

players. OL (biggest need at 4) and WR (2) are the most pressing. DE is one of those "possibles" if some of our younger players don't pan out. That's about it.

We have 17 commits with room for another 10 on the 2024 roster with some of the transfer/NFL declarations we've seen today. Nat'l signing day is a little over a month away so....a lot can still happen.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Screw Calford.


Re: When you really look at the numbers, we really only need about 3-4 portal

2

Nov 30, 2023, 11:49 AM
Reply

We may need an LB or two also

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: When you really look at the numbers, we really only need about 3-4 portal

1

Nov 30, 2023, 11:50 AM
Reply

Maybe...depends upon Carter.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Screw Calford.


Re: When you really look at the numbers, we really only need about 3-4 portal


Nov 30, 2023, 3:42 PM [ in reply to Re: When you really look at the numbers, we really only need about 3-4 portal ]
Reply

Definitely.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: When you really look at the numbers, we really only need about 3-4 portal

1

Nov 30, 2023, 11:51 AM
Reply

We need QB depth

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Need a QB.....


Nov 30, 2023, 4:53 PM
Reply

Taken none in 2024. Committed 2025 kid, who needs development, was hurt this year. Not sure Viz will be who they hoped he'd be.....

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Please not another...


Nov 30, 2023, 5:40 PM [ in reply to Re: When you really look at the numbers, we really only need about 3-4 portal ]
Reply

wasted scholarship on a player that will never see the field and any legit competition is gonna cost a minimum of $1 mil US—

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: When you really look at the numbers, we really only need about 3-4 portal

1

Nov 30, 2023, 11:54 AM
Reply

As things stand now...

QB, OL, and DE make sense. We need a veteran presence in the room with Cade and Vizzina. Putnam heading to the NFL and Mayes transferring out gives us a spot at OL. We seriously need someone to start opposite of Parker next year. Denhoff isn't that guy. Hoffler might need another year to develop.

Depending on what else happens...

LB makes sense if Carter declares for the draft.
WR makes sense if someone else transfers out.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: When you really look at the numbers, we really only need about 3-4 portal


Nov 30, 2023, 11:59 AM
Reply

Maybe on QB....but it is more of a "depth" issue than anything if one of CK/Vizzina goes down.

DE is a question mark...can we develop some of our younger guys? Did we miss on Patterson?

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Screw Calford.


Re: When you really look at the numbers, we really only need about 3-4 portal

1

Nov 30, 2023, 1:28 PM
Reply

We can't go into next season with just Cade, CV, and Pearman. We are losing 2 with 0 commits.

Outside of Parker, I'm not sure I trust any of our other DEs to be a full time starter. Hoffler would be the closest, IMO. He at least has pass rushing ability. Patterson has been on campus for three years but has never played. It doesn't seem like it's going to workout for him. Hopefully I'm wrong. He was a pretty highly rated recruit.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: When you really look at the numbers, we really only need about 3-4 portal


Nov 30, 2023, 5:46 PM
Reply

If we get down to the 3rd string QB having to start a game then we're ephed anyway and not gonna sniff the CFP. Too many holes elsewhere, roll with Pearman—

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: When you really look at the numbers, we really only need about 3-4 portal


Nov 30, 2023, 1:24 PM [ in reply to Re: When you really look at the numbers, we really only need about 3-4 portal ]
Reply

WR is a need with Collins leaving, and probably was before that. There is no guarantee the freshman contribute as quickly as most would like. Finding a veteran WR that would be here for 1 year makes a lot of sense imo.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: When you really look at the numbers, we really only need about 3-4 portal


Nov 30, 2023, 1:30 PM
Reply

The numbers don't really make sense though. We are losing Spector and Beaux with Wesco and Moore coming in. We currently are expected to have 10 WRs on the roster next year. Unless someone else transfers out, then I wouldn't expect the coaches to go after a WR in the portal.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: When you really look at the numbers, we really only need about 3-4 portal


Nov 30, 2023, 3:36 PM
Reply

I would say it should be based on do we have enough/right talent/skillsets, not the specific number. If it's strictly numbers based, that's a poor way to manage a roster imo. Especially if we're looking at someone that will be here just 1 or 2 years and brings something we need.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: When you really look at the numbers, we really only need about 3-4 portal


Nov 30, 2023, 4:44 PM [ in reply to Re: When you really look at the numbers, we really only need about 3-4 portal ]
Reply

1 or 2

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Experienced Kicker!!***


Nov 30, 2023, 4:49 PM [ in reply to Re: When you really look at the numbers, we really only need about 3-4 portal ]
Reply



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: When you really look at the numbers, we really only need about 3-4 portal


Nov 30, 2023, 12:13 PM
Reply

I think 3 or 4 good transfers is what takes any team from good to great - or from great to elite.

If you NEED more than that, your program is in trouble - and a few portal players probably won't help it.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: When you really look at the numbers, we really only need about 3-4 portal


Nov 30, 2023, 1:19 PM
Reply

Keep track, portal players “goes into” and “goes out of” Clemson ..

2024 white level membermilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: When you really look at the numbers, we really only need about 3-4 portal


Nov 30, 2023, 3:39 PM
Reply

Somebody needs to go take the list of walk-ons from Dabo's desk drawer and burn it.

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: When you really look at the numbers, we really only need about 3-4 portal


Nov 30, 2023, 4:14 PM
Reply

Woods played outside some this year. We are still deep at DT so that could happen again if needed next year.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 19
| visibility 901
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic