Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Pac-12 off to an absolutely abysmal start
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 8
| visibility 956

Pac-12 off to an absolutely abysmal start


Mar 18, 2016, 3:42 PM

I think they are something like 1-3 at the moment, about to go 1-4 with Oregon State losing to VCU, and a possible 1-5 if Hawaii can maintain their lead over Cal.

Meanwhile, the Big 10 has been pretty underwhelming thus far, especially with Mid TN handling MSU at the half. The Big 12 has been OK, and the SEC has been nowhere to be found, unsurprisingly.

Meanwhile, the little ol' ACC is undefeated at 5-0 with two more games to be played between Pitt and Wisconsin and Mich vs. Notre Dame. Wouldn't be surprised at all for the ACC to take both of those games as well.

Which is all very confusing when it comes to Clemson basketball. It is truly mind-boggling that we can't handle some these smaller teams at the beginning of the year, but manage to come out with a winning record in what I believe is the best conference in the nation. That's what puts Brownell in the hot seat IMO. Clearly, we are proving capable of beating elite competition. So losing to the Gardner-Webbs of the world doesn't hold water.

Just saying.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Pac-12 off to an absolutely abysmal start


Mar 18, 2016, 3:50 PM

We generally play to the level of our competition for whatever reason. We will play a Duke, Cuse, Miami, etc. and play solid fundamental basketball but then play Minnesota, UMass, etc. and just make mistake after mistake and go through horrendous scoring droughts.

That's the most frustrating thing with Brownell's tenure here.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Enough with the conference bs already


Mar 18, 2016, 3:54 PM

We see enough of it in football as it is

A team is a team

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


### is with you people?


Mar 18, 2016, 4:02 PM

I posted something last night about up-to-date conference performance and had somebody get way overly defensive then as well.

These are facts. Everything I said was an objective observation. The ACC is doing well in the tournament this year, and obviously did well last year as well. This begs the question of why Clemson is able to do fairly well in conference play but fail to succeed in early out-of-conference competition.

There is a difference between examining statistical trends and saying "yeah dood Clemzon is the best because the ACC is doing so well. Whoo! We are clearly the best!!!!3424". No, Clemson is not very good. However, it appears the ACC, as a conference, is.

I just find it interesting the seemingly growing disparity between our in-conference and out-of-conference results.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

U go girl...TU!***


Mar 18, 2016, 4:21 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Thanks babe!******


Mar 18, 2016, 5:10 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I certainly agree. And nothing wrong with tooting the ACC horn


Mar 18, 2016, 8:34 PM [ in reply to ### is with you people? ]

We surely get a shitload of that from the SEC in football. As for our lackluster performance in the non-conference games, that really the downfall of Brownell. Really, the biggest difference between Brownell & Purnell is the non-conference. Purnell would go 15-1 in non-conference, than 8-8 in ACC, and everyone was happy with that 23-9 record. Brownell goes 8-6 in non-conference & 10-8 in ACC, and that 18-14 record doesn't look so good. Certainly won't get you in the tournament. If it was a one year thing, would be one thing, but it's pretty much every year.
'


Message was edited by: longtallsam®


2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Enough with the conference bs already


Mar 18, 2016, 4:23 PM [ in reply to Enough with the conference bs already ]

Conference perception in basketball is actually a tangible thing. Sometimes it can determine whether you get in (Syracuse/Pitt) or if you are left out (usuc).

Better perceived conferences get more teams in than lesser ones. In football it doesn't matter as much, baseball is kind of here or there.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

In usuck's case, perception WAS reality


Mar 18, 2016, 8:42 PM

Their RPI # was abysimal.....Clemson was the strongest OOC game on their schedule and it was a very down year for the SEC (even Kentucky was barely above mediocre)

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Replies: 8
| visibility 956
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic