Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Which Clemson Defense was better 2014 or 2018?
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 40
| visibility 701

Which Clemson Defense was better 2014 or 2018?

1

Sep 8, 2023, 7:41 PM

It's a close call, but I have to go with 2014. I've never seen a Clemson defense as nasty as 2014 before or since. 2018 was poetic though.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

2018***

3

Sep 8, 2023, 7:44 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

UGA ran all over the 2014 D, no way they were better than 18***

3

Sep 8, 2023, 7:46 PM



2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: UGA ran all over the 2014 D, no way they were better than 18***

1

Sep 8, 2023, 7:50 PM

By the end of the season the 2014 defense was very nasty. I think they were one of the top defenses that year after all was said and done.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

My point still stands***

1

Sep 8, 2023, 7:58 PM



2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: My point still stands***

2

Sep 8, 2023, 8:49 PM

I mean, 2018 probably has the edge but it may be a push. Can't just choose one game. If so, we gave up 600 yards to the coots in 2018, significantly more than UGA did the year you speak.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


UGA ran all over us and we couldn't even slow them down,

2

Sep 8, 2023, 10:21 PM

SCU put up a bunch of yards in garbage time after we went up 28 and put subs in

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: UGA ran all over us and we couldn't even slow them down,

2

Sep 8, 2023, 10:25 PM

UGA scored 21 in the 4th, almost half their points. That's when they started to dominate. The todd Gurley kickoff return was big, but they did not run all over us until late. I don't think you're making the point you think you are.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


When the game was in the balance, they ran it down our

2

Sep 8, 2023, 11:59 PM

throats and stomped us out...Nobody did that to the 2018 D...That is quite a contrast from the garbage time yards SCU put up after we had gone up by 4 TDs...No comparison

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: When the game was in the balance, they ran it down our

1

Sep 9, 2023, 12:16 AM

We had Cole stoudt starting. Tied in the 3rd. They dominated the 4th with 3 plays resulting in over 120 yards and 3 rushing TDs. Coots had it within 14 in the 4th, it wasn't garbage time. UGA wore us down but your narrative of them running all over us is false, that happened late.

2014 D led the nation in ypg and ppg. I'd say it's a push since you can't name another game besides a 4tb quarter run by UGA that didn't run all over us until garbage time. Nick chubbs first career TD came against a defense that couldn't breathe.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Good Lord...it was garbage time because they ran it down


Sep 9, 2023, 12:59 AM

our throats the 2nd half

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Good Lord...it was garbage time because they ran it down


Sep 9, 2023, 1:11 AM

Just clarifying Because you've changed your narrative since I mentioned the actual gameflow

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


I have said they ran all over us and stomped us out the


Sep 9, 2023, 1:13 AM

entire time...THAT is MY narrative

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: I have said they ran all over us and stomped us out the


Sep 9, 2023, 1:15 AM

Oh ok. Well then you would be incorrect. Based on statistics.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Wait...you're saying they didn't run all over us in 2014?***


Sep 9, 2023, 1:17 AM



2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Wait...you're saying they didn't run all over us in 2014?***


Sep 9, 2023, 1:22 AM

I'm saying they were held under 200 yards rushing until garbage time, the same argument you're making as to why Usuc was successful yet it was closer game in the 4th and you're neglecting to admit 2018 had a similar bad showing because "garbage time" yet they threw for 500 yards, first time in Clemson history. Seems you're just trying to prove your point blindly, but both teams had a bad game. On paper the 2014 and 2018 teams are very similar

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


I said they ran all over us in 2014...That is true***


Sep 9, 2023, 1:25 AM



2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: When the game was in the balance, they ran it down our


Sep 9, 2023, 12:20 AM [ in reply to When the game was in the balance, they ran it down our ]

Ran for over 230 of their 320 or so yards in the 4th

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


yes, they ran all over us***


Sep 9, 2023, 1:01 AM



2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: yes, they ran all over us***


Sep 9, 2023, 1:11 AM

So when you say they ran all over us, you forgot to mention it was in garbage time and we held up well until the game was becoming out of reach? I agree

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


No, I didn't forget to mention a time, that was your pivot..


Sep 9, 2023, 1:16 AM

I said UGA ran all over us in 2014...period

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: No, I didn't forget to mention a time, that was your pivot..


Sep 9, 2023, 1:16 AM

And the coots passed for 500 in 2018. That didn't happen in garbage time.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Of course it did...We were up 28 points and they added 2


Sep 9, 2023, 1:21 AM

TDs in the 4th

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Nobody stomped out the 2018 D...the 2014 D got stomped


Sep 9, 2023, 1:23 AM

out

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Nobody stomped out the 2018 D...the 2014 D got stomped


Sep 9, 2023, 1:28 AM

And if that's your point, the 2014 UGA game is not near as bad of a defensive performance as usuc 2018. I think you're also forgetting the level of talent. Giving up 500 yards passing is far more embarrassing than letting UGA with 3 NFL backs run down your throat late after being tied at the half with Cole stoudt. If you're comparing the two teams and the two bad performances we mention, I don't think it's a debate. Not sure why it's a debate anyways, my stance was it's a push. You seem to think a good team putting us away with rushing is better than getting 500 passed on us by a terrible coot team. Agree to disagree

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


So you're counting UGA's 3 NFL RBs but not SCU's 3 NFL WRs?***


Sep 9, 2023, 1:50 AM



2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: UGA ran all over the 2014 D, no way they were better than 18***


Sep 9, 2023, 6:09 AM [ in reply to Re: UGA ran all over the 2014 D, no way they were better than 18*** ]

The 2014 defense finished number 1 in the country.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: UGA ran all over the 2014 D, no way they were better than 18***


Sep 9, 2023, 6:07 AM [ in reply to UGA ran all over the 2014 D, no way they were better than 18*** ]

UGA won the time of possession because 3 and out stout couldn't complete a forward pass. Watson should have started the game but Dabo elected to go with Stout and costed us the game.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

1981

1

Sep 8, 2023, 9:10 PM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

smoking cigarettes and writing something nasty on the wall


Re: Which Clemson Defense was better 2014 or 2018?

2

Sep 8, 2023, 9:13 PM

2018, but the 1988 - 1991'ish version was better than either, you couldn't run on them at all.

The 2014-2015 defense had maybe more talent, but 2017-2018 played with more attitude and intimidation imo

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Which Clemson Defense was better 2014 or 2018?

1

Sep 9, 2023, 1:17 AM

LOL. Go to bed Grandpa.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Which Clemson Defense was better 2014 or 2018?

1

Sep 8, 2023, 9:33 PM

1989 just ask Major Harris

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Which Clemson Defense was better 2014 or 2018?***

1

Sep 9, 2023, 12:06 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Which Clemson Defense was better 2014 or 2018?***

1

Sep 9, 2023, 12:07 AM

Who gives a crap we’re in 2023! Wake up Clemson fans

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Which Clemson Defense was better 2014 or 2018?


Sep 9, 2023, 12:12 AM

Unpopular opinion — but I think the 2017 defense was nasty… we just didn’t have the offense to compliment it.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Which Clemson Defense was better 2014 or 2018?


Sep 9, 2023, 12:18 AM

I think you could make the case for 2014, 2017, 2018, or 2021, but also, let’s not forget that the 2010 defense wasn’t half bad — but — like ‘14 (because Deshaun was hurt) ‘17 and ‘21 (ugh) the offense didn’t compliment the defense.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Which Clemson Defense was better 2014 or 2018?

1

Sep 9, 2023, 12:22 AM

Why are you worried about tigers in the past this present & future coz clemson tigers are fading fast & you better get on the train to do better coz Dabo is not taking us there.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Which Clemson Defense was better 2014 or 2018?

1

Sep 9, 2023, 1:13 AM

I'm glad you said you instead of we. Slow night in gamecock message boards?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Which Clemson Defense was better 2014 or 2018?

1

Sep 9, 2023, 1:13 AM

This isn't even a discussion. 2018.

2014 was very good statistically, top 5 in all categories. But, they did not face a tough onslaught of offensive teams, only 4 in the top 50: Georgia (#8), Georgia Tech (#11), Oklahoma (#20), and North Carolina (#38). Georgia had almost 500 yards of offense, Georgia Tech 375, and North Carolina almost 500. They allowed more than 30 points per game in those four games. 6 of the starters were drafted by the NFL.

Now, 2018. Yes, they allowed a lot of passing yards to South Carolina in a game that didn't matter and the results were never in doubt. But they finished as the #1 scoring offense in the entire country, 3.5 points less per game than 2014. They held the most teams to under 300 yards for any Clemson team in the modern era. The average score against opponents after Trevor (and so we didn't have any many 3 and outs with Bryant) took over was 48-11. They played 8 teams in the top 50 in offense, including Alabama (#3), Syracuse (#11), Texas A&M (#19), NC State (#31), Georgia Tech (#33), Wake Forest (#37), Boston College (#39), and Notre Dame (#42). I want to say that again. This team finished as the #1 defense playing 8 opponents in the top 50 in offense. 8 of the starters were drafted by the NFL (4 in the first round) and 2 signed as undrafted free agents.

If you do even a cursory glance past the stats, it's not really a debate. We should be asking if 2018 is the best college defense of all time.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

2021


Sep 9, 2023, 1:18 AM

If we would had an offense that kept the defense of the field more often, odds are this defense would have been even better.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

1981


Sep 9, 2023, 5:38 AM

In 1981 Clemson did not trail in a game after our 1st possession of the 2nd half. We started the season trailing Wofford 3-0 after they scored on the 2st possession and we trailed Tulane 5-0 & Ky 3-0 at half. We scored on our 1st possession of the second half and never again trailed after.


Message was edited by: djones73®


2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 40
| visibility 701
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic