|
Replies: 23
| visibility 1
|
Starter [358]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 773
Joined: 4/29/13
|
Roster Mash Up: Offense
Jul 1, 2013, 10:43 AM
|
|
To continue with the offensive theme of the day here's a little game I like to play. Roster mash-up.
Take the upcoming rosters for UGA and Clemson, and create your starting line-up.
Whatcha got?
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1622]
TigerPulse: 91%
Posts: 3269
Joined: 7/21/03
|
Call me crazy, but I have all Clemson players...
Jul 1, 2013, 10:51 AM
|
|
I just think ours are the best. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connoisseur [396]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 367
Joined: 2/7/11
|
Re: Roster Mash Up: Offense
Jul 1, 2013, 10:58 AM
|
|
The offensive line players could go either way. But as for the other spots, I'd be crazy to not want Georgias running backs. I like everything else we have. Maybe a TE if one of ours doesn't step up, but otherwise the rest Clemson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [54]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Roster Mash Up: Offense
Jul 1, 2013, 11:21 AM
|
|
Give us Gurley. He's an elite talent. Keep the rest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [358]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 773
Joined: 4/29/13
|
Re: Roster Mash Up: Offense
Jul 1, 2013, 11:59 AM
|
|
Here's the core group I'd go with.
QB Murray
RB Gurley
RB Marshall
WR Watkins
WR Mitchell
WR Bennett
TE Lynch
LT Thomas
LG Gates
C Andrews
RG Burnett
RT Theus
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24812]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42563
Joined: 7/31/10
|
Must be hitting that sweet liquor early. Lost....***
Jul 1, 2013, 12:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [358]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 773
Joined: 4/29/13
|
Feel free to post your own lineup ***
Jul 1, 2013, 12:05 PM
|
|
Nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18133]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22431
Joined: 9/1/99
|
You lose all credibility by taking Murray over Boyd.
Jul 1, 2013, 12:05 PM
[ in reply to Re: Roster Mash Up: Offense ] |
|
AM is one-dimensional and can't handle pressure. Tajh is way more versatile.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [358]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 773
Joined: 4/29/13
|
Not if I'm running a pro style offense
Jul 1, 2013, 12:07 PM
|
|
Murray is a much more polished pocket passer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24812]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42563
Joined: 7/31/10
|
I have to agree. He's going to get waxed and polished...***
Jul 1, 2013, 12:14 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2455]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5725
Joined: 12/27/05
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [358]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 773
Joined: 4/29/13
|
I'm a defense wins championships kinda guy
Jul 1, 2013, 12:51 PM
|
|
So, a ball-control, run-oriented offense is the best compliment IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2455]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5725
Joined: 12/27/05
|
So why not just take your roster and forget this post?***
Jul 1, 2013, 12:52 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [358]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 773
Joined: 4/29/13
|
Because Clemson has a talented roster***
Jul 1, 2013, 1:03 PM
|
|
Nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18133]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22431
Joined: 9/1/99
|
I'll take Gurley and Theus from your O and keep
Jul 1, 2013, 12:03 PM
|
|
the rest of ours.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [358]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 773
Joined: 4/29/13
|
Re: I'll take Gurley and Theus from your O and keep
Jul 1, 2013, 12:09 PM
|
|
Silly to not even consider guys like Mitchell, Andrews, Burnett, and Lynch. They'd all be starters at Clemson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2455]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5725
Joined: 12/27/05
|
Give me Theus and Gurly, as well.
Jul 1, 2013, 12:20 PM
|
|
Our offense is quite different, if you haven't noticed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18133]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22431
Joined: 9/1/99
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24812]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42563
Joined: 7/31/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [358]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 773
Joined: 4/29/13
|
Are you referring to Theus?
Jul 1, 2013, 1:05 PM
|
|
He's a SO now with a year of starts under his belt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24812]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42563
Joined: 7/31/10
|
I realize that. My point is he's only had one year. I think
Jul 1, 2013, 1:10 PM
|
|
there's more to it than how many stars he came in with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [28802]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 58393
Joined: 11/14/03
|
you might be right about Lynch...
Jul 1, 2013, 1:07 PM
[ in reply to Re: I'll take Gurley and Theus from your O and keep ] |
|
because Clemson really doesn't have any proven talent at TE. On the other hand, like some others have said, I don't think there are a lot of obvious trades on the OL. Clemson is really happy with who they've got.
I do have a hard time believing that Mitchell would start over Bryant, other than maybe because he's got more experience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [28802]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 58393
Joined: 11/14/03
|
yeah, honestly those are the only guys I'd take
Jul 1, 2013, 1:02 PM
[ in reply to I'll take Gurley and Theus from your O and keep ] |
|
Clemson's guys on the OL are just as good as UGa's, probably with the exception of Theus. I'd probably take Rome and Lynch over any of the TE's we have available, but I don't know a ton about them. Clearly I'd take our WRs over theirs, and I would take Boyd's mobility over Murray.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2763]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1981
Joined: 8/23/12
|
Just a few from UGA
Jul 1, 2013, 1:26 PM
|
|
QB: Tajh. Murray's good; Tajh is more versatile, plus our WRs match Tajh better than Murray's match him.
RB: 1-Gurley, 2-Hot Rod. Respect to Gurley, but hopefully UGA will respect Hot Rod when it's all said and done.
WR: All Clemson (I'd take King with them but he's gone)
TE: Leggett and Seckinger. UGA's are nothing to write home about.
O-Line: All Clemson. Even at C; theirs are midgets lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 23
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
