Replies: 58
| visibility 3787
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46592
Joined: 2012
|
FB Update: Clemson football weigh-in numbers
Aug 2, 2017, 3:36 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-American [554]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
Re: FB Update: Clemson football weigh-in numbers
Aug 2, 2017, 3:42 PM
|
|
Nobody is going to run up the middle on use. Can't wait to see some of the stunts and blitzes as Dex & Wilkins take up entire offensive lines.
Other number that jumps out? Tanner Muse will be a heat seeking missle.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1237]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: FB Update: Clemson football weigh-in numbers
Aug 2, 2017, 3:46 PM
|
|
Mitch Hyatt needs about 20 more, just for the NFL.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2487]
TigerPulse: 81%
32
|
|
|
|
 |
Scout Team [196]
TigerPulse: 91%
12
|
Looks great! especially
Aug 2, 2017, 3:46 PM
|
|
Tee and Amari. It looks like they will be ready to contribute early.
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Re: Looks great! especially
Aug 2, 2017, 3:51 PM
|
|
I'm very surprised to see Rogers is our heaviest WR. However, I think it will be difficult for either of them to see much playing time this year. Just too much talent in front of them, in my opinion, with the starters plus Thompson, Powell, Overton, Chase...
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
Disagree. Tee will see alot of playing time.***
Aug 2, 2017, 3:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Tiger Titan [48079]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 49059
Joined: 2004
|
Definitely. I think they both will if...
Aug 2, 2017, 4:00 PM
|
|
we have quality QB play. Plus now that we are so deep they will see a bunch of time in 2nd halves too. Those 2 will get tons of PT if our QBs play well.
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7254]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13779
Joined: 2015
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [5977]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
I don't think we have anyone who can cover Tee
Aug 2, 2017, 4:29 PM
[ in reply to Re: Looks great! especially ] |
|
I think he starts game 1. He looks like AJ Green when he's on the field and he will just jump over everyone and go get the ball.
|
|
|
|
 |
Standout [307]
TigerPulse: 95%
15
|
Re: I don't think we have anyone who can cover Tee
Aug 2, 2017, 6:17 PM
|
|
Man I was off by a pound, I said Tee would weigh 198 and he comes up at 197. Still though, 197 pound true freshman receiver. That is insane.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1571]
TigerPulse: 100%
30
|
Re: I don't think we have anyone who can cover Tee
Aug 2, 2017, 9:13 PM
[ in reply to I don't think we have anyone who can cover Tee ] |
|
Tee will be here for 3 years and on to the NFL he will play this year. A lot this year. Amari will get the opportunity to play a lot this year also. they both are dynamic with the ball in their hands.
Message was edited by: Coothater®
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1237]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: FB Update: Clemson football weigh-in numbers
Aug 2, 2017, 3:49 PM
|
|
Also, not to beat a dead horse, but Tre Lamar at 250 is Huge for us and the run game. Shaq at 244 as well.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Elite [5436]
TigerPulse: 88%
38
|
Tre Lamar
Aug 2, 2017, 3:49 PM
|
|
250= effn monster.
This kid is going to be really special folks.
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7254]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13779
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Tre Lamar
Aug 2, 2017, 4:05 PM
|
|
Shaq Smith up to 244 also! We are stack at LB for a few years.
|
|
|
|
 |
Valley Legend [12366]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
Posts: 14731
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Tre Lamar
Aug 2, 2017, 4:13 PM
|
|
After a year of few or no snaps, I'm sure Tre and Shaq are just licking their chops.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2111]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
glad to see Shadell Bell add some weight
Aug 2, 2017, 3:52 PM
|
|
hopefully he is getting blocking down
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [2809]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: FB Update: Clemson football weigh-in numbers
Aug 2, 2017, 3:52 PM
|
|
Where is AJ Terrell?
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
188 lbs***
Aug 2, 2017, 3:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2531]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: FB Update: Clemson football weigh-in numbers
Aug 2, 2017, 3:52 PM
|
|
Looks like a good summer weight conditioning regimen overall. Way to go Tigers.
|
|
|
|
 |
Heisman Winner [79800]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 20633
Joined: 2008
|
Shadell Bell - up to 230 - that's more like a TE..
Aug 2, 2017, 3:55 PM
|
|
what did they feed him?
Message was edited by: clover65®
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2487]
TigerPulse: 81%
32
|
Re: Shadell Bell - up to 230 - that's more like a TE..
Aug 2, 2017, 5:35 PM
|
|
I expect he's there to provide depth, not much more. #21
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1237]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: FB Update: Clemson football weigh-in numbers
Aug 2, 2017, 3:57 PM
|
|
I was hoping to see Mullen break 200 and Fields lost weight.
|
|
|
|
 |
Tiger Titan [48079]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 49059
Joined: 2004
|
A could that I noticed were..
Aug 2, 2017, 3:58 PM
|
|
Mark Fields lost a ton of weight. Seems odd. What do youbguys think? Also, it's great to see Shadell Bell put tbat weight on. Maybe he is another Shannon Sharpe?
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7254]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13779
Joined: 2015
|
Re: A could that I noticed were..
Aug 2, 2017, 4:05 PM
|
|
Yea idk what that is about. I do not think that can be a good thing. He did not look fat last year so idk what kind of weight he lost.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1418]
TigerPulse: 100%
29
|
Re: A could that I noticed were..
Aug 2, 2017, 6:47 PM
[ in reply to A could that I noticed were.. ] |
|
There is a very informative, incredibly in-depth article floating around somewhere on our conditioning program. It is seriously world class and only matched by few programs with the science and money we put into it. I will link it if I can find it again.
I would not worry if we see a few players not gaining/losing weight. It is not the plan to just force down calories anymore. The players are now on strict diets that are designed to match what the coaches are looking to get out of the individual players. The coaches meet with every player and the training table team and set up a game plan. Every meal is carefully designed and monitored, so if one of our players maintained weight KJ @223, that is what they want. Same goes with say DC losing a few lbs, they want to maximize speed and agility for him. Some of these guys can lose 10 lbs of fat and put on 7 of muscle and come or with a net balance on weight but look completely different.
Sorry for the lengthy reply but I have nothing but faith after reading that article. I will say 10lb loss is interesting and I hope all is well in that particular case.
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [24158]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 13641
Joined: 2007
|
Re: A could that I noticed were..
Aug 2, 2017, 7:12 PM
[ in reply to A could that I noticed were.. ] |
|
> Mark Fields lost a ton of weight.
He lost 3 pounds, according to the article.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1071]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
Re: A could that I noticed were..
Aug 5, 2017, 10:21 AM
[ in reply to A could that I noticed were.. ] |
|
I don't think 3 lbs. is a lot of weight to lose. It says he was 181 last year and 178 this year. What am I missing?
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [11934]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 16363
Joined: 1998
|
Chandler Reeves is growing into the OT position nicely.
Aug 2, 2017, 3:58 PM
|
|
Reeves came in at about 250, but he is now 6'5" and 286. This is pretty much what the staff said they expected from him when they took him as a project. Nice for depth at a critical position.
Nice to see tall, skinny Diondre Overton up to 209 lbs too.
Wow!! Look at what has happened with Shadell Bell !
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7254]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13779
Joined: 2015
|
Re: FB Update: Clemson football weigh-in numbers
Aug 2, 2017, 4:04 PM
|
|
Mark Fields and Deon Cain both lost weight from last year it seems??
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [2809]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: FB Update: Clemson football weigh-in numbers
Aug 2, 2017, 4:08 PM
|
|
Maybe that's why Cain was floating right there with Feaster's world class speed. That's not a bad weight for him.
Fields has always been a little lighter than he looks to me, but that is a very low number.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Conference [443]
TigerPulse: 81%
17
|
Couple of questions
Aug 2, 2017, 4:17 PM
|
|
1) Why did Fields lose weight?
2) Why is Anchrum the only one in class!!
3) Why is K. Joseph not gaining any weight? He needs all the weight he can handle.
4) How did Rodgers become our heaviest WR? Hes only 5'10.
PS. - Rodgers & Higgins will both see the field this season.
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7254]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13779
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Couple of questions
Aug 2, 2017, 4:27 PM
|
|
Joseph is at a good weight to be at WLB I believe. Rodgers is solid as a rock it seems. Give him a screen and watch a CB try to take him down lol.
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7254]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13779
Joined: 2015
|
Re: FB Update: Clemson football weigh-in numbers
Aug 2, 2017, 4:28 PM
[ in reply to Re: FB Update: Clemson football weigh-in numbers ] |
|
Maybe true. If he is even faster than last year losing 10 Lbs is fine with me. Also Van Smith lost weight wonder if it is the same reason.
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [2809]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: FB Update: Clemson football weigh-in numbers
Aug 2, 2017, 4:31 PM
|
|
Could be. Van Smith is probably playing near his max weight as is. He really didn't have a lot more size he could put on for his frame without effecting his athleticism.
I agree about Joseph. He's not in the middle anymore and dropping a little weight will help him on the edge.
Rodgers is going to be a MONSTER.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Phenom [15028]
TigerPulse: 82%
49
Posts: 23483
Joined: 1998
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Conference [427]
TigerPulse: 97%
17
|
Wut??? you must have missed what the 2nd
Aug 2, 2017, 5:24 PM
|
|
Set of numbers is.
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [8681]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [6940]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Tucker Israel?
Aug 2, 2017, 4:15 PM
|
|
Tucker isn't listed at all. I know he's been sick but didn't he report in for camp?
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [12506]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
Posts: 10500
Joined: 2011
|
When he stepped on the scale it just showed
Aug 2, 2017, 4:15 PM
|
|
"eat more chikin".
hth.
|
|
|
|
 |
Tiger Titan [48079]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 49059
Joined: 2004
|
Doesn't he have a medical issue?*****
Aug 2, 2017, 4:37 PM
[ in reply to Tucker Israel? ] |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1771]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: FB Update: Clemson football weigh-in numbers
Aug 2, 2017, 4:18 PM
|
|
I love Hyatt is our smallest olinemen at 302! Got the big hogs up front i love it that's where games are won. I also love Fiester at 222 nice to see him add good weight with the shoulder finally healed. Tre Lemar at 6 5 250 with his athleticsism is scary at middle LB. can't wait to see this defense on the field!
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [5919]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
FAKE NEWS! Justin Falcinelli - 304 / 307***
Aug 2, 2017, 4:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-American [555]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
Re: FB Update: Clemson football weigh-in numbers
Aug 2, 2017, 5:14 PM
|
|
Good to see Hunter Johnson up to 210.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2487]
TigerPulse: 81%
32
|
Feaster
Aug 2, 2017, 5:31 PM
|
|
Coaches seem to be driving home, getting bigger, stronger and protecting the QB. But is that a good weight for him, 222?
really..
#21
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2211]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Feaster
Aug 2, 2017, 6:39 PM
|
|
Did you see his race with Cain a few weeks ago. I think he's fine.
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [8681]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: FB Update: Clemson football weigh-in numbers
Aug 2, 2017, 5:40 PM
|
|
Rodgers is going to be a tank.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [20860]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 14648
Joined: 2009
|
Jabril Robinson was a solid contributor last year - with 15
Aug 2, 2017, 5:57 PM
|
|
pounds extra packing that nasty, that has to help free up Wilkins even more for extra DE duty considering the shrinking depth there.
And Feast at 222. I'm really liking what our RB corps is shaping up to be this year.
|
|
|
|
 |
Valley Legend [12625]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
Posts: 10346
Joined: 2006
|
Re: Jabril Robinson was a solid contributor last year - with 15
Aug 2, 2017, 6:11 PM
|
|
I think all Feaster really needs is just some confidence. If he gets comfortable with his pass protection and get some reps he should start looking like the RB that we thought he would be. I was a little surpried at Fuller's weight. I thought he would be close to to 220. He runs like a bigger back.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2211]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Our LB's are going to terrorize CFB this year.
Aug 2, 2017, 6:42 PM
|
|
BIG AND FAST. They are gonna put a hurtin on some folks. What RB wants to block a 6'5" 250# LB? None of them!
We might put up an even better performance against GT this year and they were smothered all game last year.
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [24158]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 13641
Joined: 2007
|
Impressive gains by several guys
Aug 2, 2017, 7:23 PM
|
|
Shadell Bell - 230 / 215 Tavien Feaster - 222 / 207 Zerrick Cooper - 219 / 205 T.J. Chase - 185 / 164 Diondre Overton - 209 / 196 Tre Lamar - 250 / 236
Hopefully it's all good weight.
Does Amari Rodgers need to lose a few pounds? 212 for a 5'10 receiver seems a little heavy, if the numbers here are correct. Artavis weighed in at 193 last year, for comparison purposes.
Also, I trust our coaching staff but 6 tight ends seems like a lot, no?
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [43143]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 43562
Joined: 1998
|
6 TEs and only 5 Safeties
Aug 2, 2017, 8:16 PM
|
|
has never seemed right to me either.
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [24158]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 13641
Joined: 2007
|
Re: 6 TEs and only 5 Safeties
Aug 2, 2017, 8:19 PM
|
|
It would seem to suggest that we don't have much confidence in any of them in particular to win the starting job, which is concerning.
Then again, we had a similar situation with RBs a few years ago and that worked out OK.
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [24158]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 13641
Joined: 2007
|
Re: FB Update: Clemson football weigh-in numbers
Aug 2, 2017, 7:44 PM
|
|
Did TJ Chase really weigh in at 164 last year? That can't be right, can it?
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [3769]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: FB Update: Clemson football weigh-in numbers
Aug 2, 2017, 8:08 PM
|
|
That was right. He was crazy skinny. Thats why he didn't play
|
|
|
|
 |
Rookie [15]
TigerPulse: 100%
2
|
Re: FB Update: Clemson football weigh-in numbers
Aug 2, 2017, 8:05 PM
|
|
How about AJ Terrell?
|
|
|
|
 |
Redshirt [94]
TigerPulse: 82%
10
|
Where is Terrell (CB)?***
Aug 2, 2017, 8:30 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 58
| visibility 3787
|
|
|