|
Replies: 23
| visibility 1
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
Chad's O has failed miserably against fast, strong and taken loaded defenses.
Jan 16, 2014, 10:36 PM
|
|
At Vandy, in the SEC, all he's going to see are faster, stronger and more talented defenses. Would be a poor decision for Vandy to hire morris imo. He needs to be at a school with players who can get past defenses with speed, and wear a D out physically throughout a game. Neither of which will happen at Vandy. Not necessarily the most charismatic guy as far as the recruiting trail goes, either.
Good luck to him if he takes off, but Scar and FSU prove that with similar or better talent to match up opposite his players on offense, he panics, prematurely diverts from his game plan and essentially folds.
UF, UGA (Pruitt), SCAR, TENN, LSU, BAMA, AU and aTm would all sincerly thank Vandy.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
*talent loaded***
Jan 16, 2014, 10:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1250]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 2645
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Chad's O has failed miserably against fast, strong and taken loaded defenses.
Jan 16, 2014, 10:38 PM
|
|
That's because FSU is more talented than what we are. Has nothing to do with the scheme.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11934]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16363
Joined: 11/30/98
|
The notable exception of course, being LSU ...
Jan 16, 2014, 10:38 PM
|
|
But, at Vandy, he won't inherit a Tajh Boyd, Nuk Hopkins, nor will he pull in a Sammy Watkins. He will have to chicken salad outta ... well, you know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [20945]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10175
Joined: 9/9/04
|
I think I speak for everyone when I say...
Jan 16, 2014, 10:39 PM
|
|
Tell em' coot
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [20945]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10175
Joined: 9/9/04
|
Oh...and LSU's defense says hello
Jan 16, 2014, 10:43 PM
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1346]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3868
Joined: 11/19/11
|
Too bad no one will pay you for your in depth analysis.
Jan 16, 2014, 10:42 PM
|
|
Maybe you should send a copy of this to the search firm working for Vandy. They might find it.......entertaining?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
LSU is not an exception because
Jan 16, 2014, 10:43 PM
|
|
We heard for weeks how much more physical they were and soft we were , when we actually had highly talented sleeping beasts of giants waiting for someone to tap into their physicality.... which happened for a month in practice leading up to that game.... very physical practices. And the chip on our shoulder to prove to the country that were could match their physicality (not possible at vandy), allowed us to do just that and come away with the win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [20945]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10175
Joined: 9/9/04
|
How long did it take you to come up with that long winded
Jan 16, 2014, 10:46 PM
|
|
version of...
"They didn't want it enough..."
Been there, heard that...the last two bowl games. Guess who else had a month to prepare...yeah LSU, that's who.
Clueless, aren't you clucker?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11934]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16363
Joined: 11/30/98
|
How does any of that make it not an exception?
Jan 16, 2014, 10:46 PM
[ in reply to LSU is not an exception because ] |
|
Our offense laid it to one of the most fastest, strongest, most talented defenses in the country. How they did it ... why they did it is open to debate, but the fact that they DID do it is not debatable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
I love Chad Morris... just think he needs to pump the brakes a little bit
Jan 16, 2014, 10:51 PM
|
|
With all of these interviews.... Vandy won't be a good fit for him, as I've already stated, and he needs to wait for a program that has built in recruiting advantages because he won't be able to recruit top notch assistants.... especially to a place like vandy. Which means he'll have trouble getting players to buy in as well. Franklin is a rare personality type, very charismatic and enthusiastic. Best guy they've ever had at head coach, and will be VERY hard to replace.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5977]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6620
Joined: 11/30/98
|
This isn't true...................
Jan 16, 2014, 10:53 PM
|
|
We didn't execute against South Carolina it wasn't the offense..................... Mizzu and Texas A&M run the hurry up spread and they haven't had a problem................. This SEC defense stuff is just bull.................
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [713]
TigerPulse: 38%
Posts: 1349
Joined: 10/4/04
|
Re: Chad's O has failed miserably against fast, strong and taken loaded defenses.
Jan 16, 2014, 10:54 PM
|
|
Let's play pick your games to make a point Morris had more talent at Clemson than he would ever get at Vandy especially at the skill positions. Hasn;t everyone been talking about Morris would never take little ole Vandy, he is too good for that lowly job. he will get bigger and better...now it seems maybe he is interested and the OP makes a sensible statement about inconsistency with the most talent Clemson has had in years and more at the skill positions than most top 10 teams have ever had
Dabo and Chad have won games against top 20 opponents when they have over a month to prepare, LSU, UGA, Auburn, OSU
How do they fare when playing week to week
5 losses to USc, FSU spanking,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22965]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 25005
Joined: 6/24/99
|
Re: Chad's O has failed miserably against fast, strong and taken loaded defenses.
Jan 16, 2014, 11:10 PM
|
|
So, your chicken brain has determined Clemson is 4-6 against Top 20 or Top 25 teams???
How many games has the OBC lost to teams NOT in Top 20 or Top 25 in that same period of time??? 'Cuz I can't think of a single game Clemson has lost to an unranked team in a long time. Certainly not since Chad Morris has been at Clemson. I suppose we'll just have to content ourselves momentarily in being one game below .500 against some of the highest ranked teams in America.
'Course, the Tigers didn't lose to some 3-8 team from Knoxville this season to keep us out of a BCS bowl either.
Message was edited by: tigrjm76®
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4744]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2250
Joined: 11/19/12
|
Re: Gus Malzahn disagrees***
Jan 16, 2014, 10:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [174]
TigerPulse: 46%
Posts: 410
Joined: 7/28/09
|
Re: Chad's O has failed miserably against fast, strong and taken loaded defenses.
Jan 16, 2014, 11:03 PM
|
|
Totally false and untrue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
SEC defense is bull in regards to our offense...not Vandy's
Jan 16, 2014, 11:04 PM
|
|
They'll be embarrassed regularly in the HUNH. Really? You want to try and score in less than 2-23 minutes and give SEC powers more chances to come up with a big play (s) to win the game. Only shot they'll have is to try and play keep away and limit the number of possessions their oppenents will have.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22965]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 25005
Joined: 6/24/99
|
Any chance you'll figure out how to properly respond
Jan 16, 2014, 11:20 PM
|
|
to a post on Tigernet???
That usuck IQ (or should I say, lack thereof) is showing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
usc Jr is 2-4 in the last 3 years vs. ranked sec teams
Jan 16, 2014, 11:26 PM
|
|
Strong sec schedule, considering Clemson's only 3-2 vs. ACC top 15 teams past 3 years.
Just some ranked game comparisons to think about
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
Funny though that jr has only played 6 ranked sec teams on 3 yrs
Jan 16, 2014, 11:29 PM
|
|
And still couldn't bag a division title.... in the best stretch of football they've ever experienced
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
Funny though that jr has only played 6 ranked sec teams on 3 yrs
Jan 16, 2014, 11:32 PM
|
|
And still couldn't bag a division title.... in the best stretch of football they've ever experienced
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2609]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6653
Joined: 9/1/11
|
Re: Chad's O has failed miserably against fast, strong and taken loaded defenses.
Jan 16, 2014, 11:51 PM
|
|
Sec defenses have been embarrassed by spread offenses. Look up the numbers. SMH
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zealot [868]
TigerPulse: 50%
Posts: 1261
Joined: 1/29/10
|
Re: Re: Chad's O has failed miserably against fast, strong and taken loaded defenses.
Jan 17, 2014, 6:28 AM
|
|
But Chad's offense hasn't embarrassed them.
Our offense sputters against good defenses. The stats prove it.
Good thing Dabo made a great hire and turned our defense around.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [55426]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 58428
Joined: 7/18/07
|
Re: Chad's O has failed miserably against fast, strong and taken loaded defenses.
Jan 17, 2014, 12:46 AM
|
|
SC didn't prove a ### thing this year. Clemson proved it can lose to a lesser team with at least 6 turn overs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 23
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
