|
Replies: 28
| visibility 1
|
Orange Blooded [4020]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 8047
Joined: 12/9/01
|
Should we now call it a Seditious Conspiracy instead of
Jan 13, 2022, 5:28 PM
|
|
Insurrection ?
Do you agree Miura?
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [13146]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14139
Joined: 11/2/15
|
Yes
Jan 13, 2022, 6:13 PM
|
|
It was “conspiracy” cause they pre-planned their outfits via messaging.
It was “seditious” because they used the Morse code button.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4020]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 8047
Joined: 12/9/01
|
Re: Yes
Jan 13, 2022, 6:27 PM
|
|
You're not taking this well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5854]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3673
Joined: 11/18/00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4020]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 8047
Joined: 12/9/01
|
Re: Should we now call it a Seditious Conspiracy instead of
Jan 13, 2022, 7:34 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10134]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8862
Joined: 7/20/12
|
Re: Should we now call it a Seditious Conspiracy instead of
Jan 13, 2022, 9:52 PM
|
|
Been over a year and this guys is still talking about an insurrection every single day. For 365 DAYS STRAIGHT! This is the only thing he is holding onto to justify voting for the dumbarses he voted for. Take this away and he has nothing left!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4020]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 8047
Joined: 12/9/01
|
Re: Should we now call it a Seditious Conspiracy instead of
Jan 13, 2022, 10:29 PM
|
|
New information is coming out everyday. You don't seem too concerned that 11 "tourists" were indicted today for seditious conspiracy. Not worth discussing, correct?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2669]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 8366
Joined: 8/12/14
|
Re: Should we now call it a Seditious Conspiracy instead of
Jan 13, 2022, 11:18 PM
|
|
Sedition, fun word!!!!!
Please explain to me why these oath keepers were areested for sedition, but ray epps DID NOTHING ILLEGAL!!!!
Sedition: conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4020]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 8047
Joined: 12/9/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4020]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 8047
Joined: 12/9/01
|
Re: Should we now call it a Seditious Conspiracy instead of
Jan 13, 2022, 11:29 PM
|
|
I can tell you haven't read my link.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Should we now call it a Seditious Conspiracy instead of
Jan 13, 2022, 11:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4020]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 8047
Joined: 12/9/01
|
Re: Should we now call it a Seditious Conspiracy instead of
Jan 14, 2022, 12:09 AM
|
|
I linked for you a 48 page grand jury indictment for the 11 who were charged. It's laughable to compare standing on a street corner saying "go into the capital" with what's in the 48 page indictment. Not even in the same universe.. Yes, sedition is very hard to prove. But you should be VERY concerned about what's in this indictment. Continue your ignorance, it's what we expect out of you anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Should we now call it a Seditious Conspiracy instead of
Jan 14, 2022, 12:31 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4020]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 8047
Joined: 12/9/01
|
Re: Should we now call it a Seditious Conspiracy instead of
Jan 14, 2022, 7:01 AM
|
|
This is too funny. You think there's ample evidence for Epps to be jailed immediately, yet you find this indictment "lacking". How dizzy are you from all this spin? LOL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Should we now call it a Seditious Conspiracy instead of
Jan 14, 2022, 9:42 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4020]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 8047
Joined: 12/9/01
|
Re: Should we now call it a Seditious Conspiracy instead of
Jan 14, 2022, 10:49 AM
|
|
Who has been prosecuted for less? Why would you be on the Most wanted list if your whereabouts are known? I'll wait.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Should we now call it a Seditious Conspiracy instead of
Jan 14, 2022, 10:54 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4020]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 8047
Joined: 12/9/01
|
Re: Should we now call it a Seditious Conspiracy instead of
Jan 14, 2022, 10:57 AM
|
|
Give me the name of someone who has been prosecuted for standing on the corner and saying " go into the capital".
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Should we now call it a Seditious Conspiracy instead of
Jan 14, 2022, 11:30 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4020]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 8047
Joined: 12/9/01
|
Re: Should we now call it a Seditious Conspiracy instead of
Jan 14, 2022, 11:43 AM
|
|
They can't prove Epps did anything illegal, even though both you and I know he's MAGA trash and an embarrassment to this country. His defense is that he meant enter the Capital like you normally would. We both know that's BS, but it probably won't hold up in court, therefore he hasn't been charged, at least for now. Sorry. But the "seditious conspiracy"/insurrection is the fault of MAGA filth, not the FBI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Should we now call it a Seditious Conspiracy instead of
Jan 14, 2022, 12:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4020]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 8047
Joined: 12/9/01
|
Re: Should we now call it a Seditious Conspiracy instead of
Jan 14, 2022, 1:02 PM
|
|
Believing that the FBI was responsible for inciting the Insurrection is as dumb as believing that 9/11 was an inside job. It makes absolutely 0 sense as there is no motive and would be impossible to pull off without a whistleblower bringing the whole thing down. And in this case, the FBI was under the leadership of Trump. It's just a ridiculous fantasy to try and deflect from the uncomfortable truth that the MAGA movement showed themselves to be nothing more than a cult that put its leaders interests above those of our country.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Should we now call it a Seditious Conspiracy instead of
Jan 14, 2022, 1:14 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24808]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42555
Joined: 7/31/10
|
"as dumb as believing that 9/11 was an inside job"... Time
Jan 14, 2022, 1:29 PM
[ in reply to Re: Should we now call it a Seditious Conspiracy instead of ] |
|
will expose the mind-numbing cognitive dissonance of the masses... Basic physics alone would be a good start.
As to the FBI, maybe they could release the 80+ videos they managed to secure from local businesses around the Pentagon within the first few hours after the 'plane' hit... I doubt they still exist. That would be evidence. Instead, they gave us 2 frames from a parking lot camera.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10134]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8862
Joined: 7/20/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4020]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 8047
Joined: 12/9/01
|
Re: Should we now call it a Seditious Conspiracy instead of
Jan 14, 2022, 7:37 AM
|
|
How fulfilling is your life if you took the time to post that. LOL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6402]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11145
Joined: 6/5/03
|
Re: Should we now call it a Seditious Conspiracy instead of
Jan 14, 2022, 12:19 AM
|
|
Can you ever start an OP that doesn't end with a question mark?
Can you ever state anything definitively?
Are your really lame#ss as squinting Brandon?
Just tell us one thing that ends with a period. Like "I swear I don't beat my wife" or "I've never buggered a watermelon" or something. One thing Bermie-bro, that's all I'm asking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4020]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 8047
Joined: 12/9/01
|
Re: Should we now call it a Seditious Conspiracy instead of
Jan 14, 2022, 7:02 AM
|
|
Why are you so triggered?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 28
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
