Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
Game came down to two things
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 9
| visibility 1

Game came down to two things


Nov 30, 2013, 11:56 PM

1) decision making from our qb. Which has been a theme of late.

2) lack of overall LB speed. Exposed because SC could spread us out and put shaw in a 1v1 race with our LB time and time again especially with the luxury of having a lead.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Fumbles & Interceptions?!***


Nov 30, 2013, 11:57 PM



2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

/\This/\


Dec 1, 2013, 12:02 AM

Football isn't that hard. We turned the ball over. That's it.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

LOL! I was going to say $hitty officiating and turnovers!


Dec 1, 2013, 12:08 AM [ in reply to Fumbles & Interceptions?!*** ]

And lack of game preparation.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Fumbles & Interceptions?!***


Dec 1, 2013, 12:11 AM [ in reply to Fumbles & Interceptions?!*** ]

That and even more important was our inability to get off the field on 3rd down. The stupid turnovers and penalties didn't help at all either. I didn't think we would look as lackluster as we did. Not much protection from the OL, turnovers by special teams and letting Shaw run freely on almost every 3rd down was a killing combo.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

our DBs couldn't cover their receivers...


Nov 30, 2013, 11:58 PM

and Shaw killed us every time we left the middle open.

Aside from the last 4 minutes, I don't think Boyd was all that bad tonight.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-franc1968.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: our DBs couldn't cover their receivers...


Dec 1, 2013, 12:18 AM

right, 6 TO's had less to do with the outcome. Boyd running into clowney's arms instead of stepping up in the pocket never stalled drives...

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Thought the DBs covered well enough to win that game


Dec 1, 2013, 12:00 AM

Tied late in the game the senior qb needs to make plays not turn the ball over.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

We could still have won with the early TO


Dec 1, 2013, 12:11 AM

We weren't out of it till the Tajh fumble. Faster mor athletic LBs and idk if the coots score a point.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: We could still have won with the early TO


Dec 1, 2013, 12:17 AM

game was over on the 4th and 2 offsides play. There is a reason spurrier took that gamble, and he won. It was a pretty tight game with Clemson gaining momentum until that point.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 9
| visibility 1
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Hey TNet!!! What's for supper/dinner???

by MyfavOrange®

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic