Should Anthony been ejected for targeting foul against Scar?


by - Assoc. Editor -
    |

Clemson senior linebacker Stephone AnthonyStephone Anthony
Sr. Linebacker
#42 6-2, 244
Polkton, NC

View Full Profile
was ejected for targeting in the third quarter of the Palmetto Bowl.

On a third down play, Anthony pushed Thompson as he was throwing it out of bounds. Anthony had some contact with Thompson's helmet but it was minimal. The refs took a few minutes to look at it on replay and decided it was indeed the correct call.

Do you think that it was the right call by the officials? Here is the video below from our friends at Saturday Down South.

Send Feedback to Tony Crumpton: Email | Comment
    |
Loading...
Post your comments!
Subject (Replies: 41) Author
FB Update: Should Anthony been ejected for targeting foul against Scar?
TigerNet News
I wonder how this thread will go***
york_tiger
uh, no.***
tiger_swimmer®
Re: uh, no.***
TIGERINJERSEY
Re: uh, no.***
OrangeJase
Uh, Hail no!
clover65®
Re: FB Update: Should Anthony been ejected for targeting foul against Scar?
tigerfan22334®
umm. Does spurrier attend AA meetings
RunJumpCatch
But he is a quiter!***
Neal in NC®
Re: FB Update: Should Anthony been ejected for targeting foul against Scar?
stephen2907
Re: FB Update: Should Anthony been ejected - NO!
CUalum79ALLn65®
Re: FB Update: Should Anthony been ejected - NO!
7173TIGER®
Of all the bad calls you list the
MackDaddy®
Re: Of all the bad calls you list the
adam_ncnn®
Re: I'll go with Death Valley's reply
metiger
Re: FB Update: Should Anthony been ejected for targeting foul against Scar?
kodibuddy
Re: FB Update: Should Anthony been ejected for targeting foul against Scar?
irmotgr78®
a joke of a call
orngpurple®
Re: a joke of a call
deleted
if york and I agree on anything….
epifunny
Wasn't that The Dude from WV?
deleted
Re: Wasn't that The Dude from WV?
deleted
You mean Swami?
york_tiger
The only thing worse than this call...
RogerS®
Re: The only thing worse than this call...
ptctiger93
IF the ACC doesn't intervene on Clemson's behalf on this
coachmac
Zebra Morons
CaptainB1
As bad as the targeting call was...
longtallsam®
that was horrible call as well
camdentiger09
Re: that was horrible call as well
richmaja®
Bordeline personal foul call but definately not targeting
gripitnripit
ACC replay officials need to be ejected.***
Clemsnman®
Dabo said it best
PsychoTea
They "took a few minutes"?
BlackFriar
Re: FB Update: Should Anthony been ejected for targeting foul against Scar?
chsapp
Re: FB Update: Should Anthony been ejected for targeting foul against Scar?
Tiger95
No, one of the worst calls for targeting***
wueagle86®
So is Anthony out for the first half of the bowl game?
clempsun
Yes he will miss 1st half.***
TigersAndCubs
It was roughing, but no way in #### that was targetting or
TigersAndCubs
Re: FB Update: Should Anthony been ejected for targeting foul against Scar?
cougartigerfan
Re: FB Update: Should Anthony been ejected for targeting foul against Scar?
jeancooper®

Former Clemson LB traded to Dolphins

Don't want to get smacked by Wilkins? Don't score. Or play rock-paper-scissors

ESPN analyst: Bryant 'will be better' than Watson

WATCH: Clemson is a complete football team

Dates set for 2018 Clemson-SC, Clemson-TAMU

Former Clemson WR signs with Roughriders

Wilkins: 'Don't score if you don't want to get me too excited'

WATCH: O'Daniel on his transition into playmaker role

WATCH: Hyatt seeing good things from O-line
Sign Up for E-Mail News Alerts
Features
Updates
Daily Digest