Breaking News
Photo-realistic Death Valley replica!
Sagarin Ratings Released

by TigerNet Staff - Sunday, November 25, 2012 9:33 AM
    |

Sagarin, like the developers of many other sports rating systems, does not divulge the exact methodology behind his system. He offers two rating systems, each of which gives each team a certain number of points. One system, "Elo chess," is presumably based on the Elo rating system used internationally to rank chess players. This system uses only wins and losses with no reference to the victory margin. The other system, "Predictor," takes victory margin into account. For that system the difference in two teams' rating scores is meant to predict the margin of victory for the stronger team at a neutral venue. For both systems teams gain higher ratings within the Sagarin system by winning games against stronger opponents, factoring in such things as home-venue advantage. For the Predictor system, margin of victory (or defeat) factors in also, but a law of diminishing returns is applied. Therefore, a football team that wins a game by a margin of 7-6 is rewarded less than a team that defeats the same opponent under the same circumstances 21-7, but a team that wins a game by a margin of 35-0 receives similar ratings to a team that defeats the same opponent 70-0. This characteristic has the effect of recognizing "comfortable" victories, while limiting the reward for running up the score.

From USA Today:

1 Notre Dame A = 94.87 12 0 74.68( 30) 2 0 | 4 0 | 96.65 1 | 93.09 3
2 Alabama A = 94.62 11 1 72.94( 39) 0 1 | 2 1 | 91.44 7 | 99.13 1
3 Oregon A = 94.18 11 1 74.48( 31) 0 1 | 4 1 | 92.73 3 | 95.49 2
4 Florida A = 93.50 11 1 77.38( 13) 2 1 | 5 1 | 95.74 2 | 91.41 6
5 Kansas State A = 92.34 10 1 75.94( 24) 1 0 | 4 1 | 91.74 6 | 92.61 5
6 Georgia A = 91.20 11 1 71.27( 42) 1 1 | 2 1 | 92.47 4 | 89.75 8
7 Texas A&M A = 90.76 10 2 75.57( 25) 1 1 | 1 2 | 88.64 12 | 93.01 4
8 Stanford A = 90.68 10 2 78.33( 5) 1 1 | 6 1 | 91.91 5 | 89.27 9
9 Oklahoma A = 89.70 9 2 77.79( 11) 0 2 | 4 2 | 88.91 11 | 90.18 7
10 South Carolina A = 89.48 10 2 74.18( 34) 1 1 | 3 2 | 91.41 8 | 87.54 11
11 LSU A = 88.68 10 2 75.23( 27) 2 2 | 2 2 | 90.75 9 | 86.64 14
12 Oregon State A = 87.33 8 3 79.37( 3) 0 2 | 3 2 | 86.85 13 | 87.47 12
13 Oklahoma State A = 85.99 7 4 77.24( 14) 0 2 | 2 4 | 83.72 16 | 88.40 10
14 Ohio State A = 85.62 12 0 70.41( 51) 0 0 | 2 0 | 90.03 10 | 82.16 24
15 Texas A = 84.85 8 3 76.19( 20) 0 1 | 3 2 | 84.45 15 | 84.90 16
16 Southern California A = 84.51 7 5 78.26( 6) 0 3 | 1 5 | 82.86 19 | 86.01 15
17 Nebraska A = 84.25 10 2 73.52( 36) 0 0 | 2 2 | 85.76 14 | 82.58 20
18 Florida State A = 84.12 10 2 66.05( 72) 0 1 | 1 1 | 81.50 22 | 87.02 13
19 UCLA A = 83.26 9 3 74.31( 33) 0 1 | 4 2 | 83.29 17 | 82.87 19
20 Michigan A = 82.97 8 4 74.34( 32) 0 2 | 1 4 | 83.28 18 | 82.31 22
21 Arizona State A = 81.70 7 5 74.08( 35) 0 1 | 1 4 | 78.90 32 | 84.80 17
22 Clemson A = 81.59 10 2 66.97( 66) 0 1 | 0 2 | 80.59 28 | 82.30 23
23 Baylor A = 81.41 6 5 78.23( 7) 1 1 | 2 3 | 79.27 31 | 83.54 18
24 TCU A = 81.11 7 4 76.23( 19) 0 1 | 2 3 | 80.60 27 | 81.28 26
25 Utah State A = 80.81 10 2 64.01( 97) 0 0 | 1 0 | 79.67 29 | 81.67 25


Read the full article here
Send Feedback to TigerNet Staff: Email | Comment
    |


Post your comments


Discuss this update on the Board - Chat about this update in TigerActive Chat


Subscribe to our RSS Feed
Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on Facebook
Sign Up for News Alerts
Features
Updates
Daily Digest