CLEMSON FOOTBALL

Commentary: Are New Coordinators Ready for the ACC?

Commentary: Are New Coordinators Ready for the ACC?


by - Correspondent -

An interesting question was posed last week by my radio sports talk co-host, Mark Hauser.

Mark wondered aloud if there was any significance in the apparent major hires made by Clemson head football coach Tommy Bowden. The question was not so much who the men are - Rob Spence as offensive coordinator and Vic Koenning as defensive coordinator - but from where they come:

Spence from Toledo, Koenning from Troy. The MAC and the Sunbelt, respectively.

Now, to clarify we say "apparent" hires because Clemson has issued nothing official concerning any of the coaching vacancies. However enough has been written, including interviews with Spence and Koenning, that one can surmise the only way the duo won't be Clemson's new coordinators is if one or the other has a last-minute change of heart (such as Spence did with Utah a couple of years back).

Spence Bio

Age: 45 (born 10-10-58)

Hometown: Middletown, Delaware

Alma Mater: Iona ('81)

Coaching Experience:

2001- Assistant Head Coach/Offensive Coordinator, Toledo

2000 Co-Offensive Coordinator/Quarterbacks, Louisiana Tech

1999 Associate Head Coach/Offensive Coordinator, Hofstra

1997-98 Offensive Coordinator/Quarterbacks, Hofstra

1994-96 Quarterbacks, Maryland

1992-93 Inside Receivers/Tight ends, Maryland

1991 Quarterbacks, Holy Cross

1990 Offensive Coordinator/Quarterbacks, Hofstra

1989 Offensive Coordinator, Iona

1984-88 Head coach, Iona Prep School, New Rochelle, NY

1982-84 Offensive Coordinator, Iona Prep School, New Rochelle, NY

1981-82 Assistant coach, Pelham Memorial

Playing Experience: Iona (1978-81)

The paperwork is in the hands of the school, being processed as we speak. As soon as that's done, the announcements will be made.

But, back to Mark's question.

Curiosity led him to ask if Tiger fans are content with hiring coaches from the MAC and Sunbelt, or if they (fans) should expect a major-conference school such as Clemson to pull any assistant coaching hires from other major conferences.

It was a very good talk radio question, asked with the intent of bringing about response from both sides of the issue. Which it did.

My own personal view is that where the coaches come from doesn't matter nearly as much as who they are and what they bring to the table. If the fit is right, who cares if the new coordinators are from the MAC or Mars?

The two things which matter most, I believe, are philosophy and scheme.

If a potential coordinator doesn't share a similar philosophy with his would-be boss, the marriage almost certainly is doomed from the beginning.

Spence, like Bowden, is enamored with the one-back offense. He has been tremendously successful all four years as Toledo's offensive coordinator, finishing in the Top 20 in total offense each season. His Rockets were No. 11 in the country in 2004, compared to Clemson's finish at No. 110.

Spence has had great success running out of the one-back set, and his quarterbacks complete passes at an astounding rate - no fewer than 66.97 percent during his Toledo tenure. By comparison, Clemson's Charlie Whitehurst completed just 50.14 percent in 2004.

So taken with Spence is Bowden that, apparently, the head coach is willing to relinquish control of the offense. That's quite a step for the man who repeatedly for the last six years has told the press this is "his" offense.

But Bowden could sense the offense needed new blood, and because Spence's philosophy is so similar to his own it appears he's willing to give Spence a good bit of authority over what is or isn't run.

Koenning, too, seems to share Bowden's philosophy concerning defensive football.

Koenning Bio

PERSONAL DATA

Born: Feb. 26, 1960

Hometown: Owasso, Okla.

Wife: Tracey (Templeton)

Children: Kimberly, Brady, Camden and Jackson

EDUCATION

BS, Communication, Kansas State '83

MA, Athletic Administration, Memphis '88

COACHING EXPERIENCE

2003-present, Troy State University

Defensive Coordinator/LB

1999-2002, University of Wyoming Head Coach

1997-99, University of Wyoming Defensive Coordinator/ILB

1991-96, University of Memphis Defensive Backs

1986-90, University of Memphis Graduate Assistant/FB Strength Coach

PLAYING EXPERIENCE

1986, Green Bay Packers (NFL)

1984-85, Oklahoma Outlaws (USFL)

1983, Denver Broncos (NFL)

1979-82, Kansas State University

1982 Independence Bowl

For six years Bowden has harped about turnovers, urging his defense to be more aggressive and get better at taking the ball away from the opposition. Instead, Clemson's 16 takeaways in 2004 was the lowest total for a Tiger team since the mid 1950s.

Meanwhile, Koenning's Troy defense was busy forcing 35 turnovers in 2004, 25 of them interceptions. His defense finished 16th in the country last season, a full 10 spots better than Clemson.

Quick impact seems to be Koenning's thing. He had early success at Troy, and back in 1997 - in his first year as Wyoming's defensive coordinator - the Cowboys were 23rd in total defense and set a school record with 24 interceptions.

So the philosophy matches up on both sides. No problem.

But those numbers were achieved at lesser schools in lesser conferences, playing against lesser competition. And herein lies the crux of Mark's earlier question:

Can those coordinators have similar success at Clemson, in the ACC, competing on the national level? Or will bigger schools with better athletes prove too difficult to stop?

My guess is no, and it goes back to the scheme.

If the scheme is solid, offense or defense, it will be successful at any level of football as long as the players execute properly. Yes, Spence and Koenning will be facing much better athletes (in theory) than they did at the smaller schools.

But don't overlook the fact that the athletes at their disposal at Clemson (again, in theory) should be superior than what each coached at Toledo or Troy.

So again, it comes back to scheme and execution. All a coach can do is, by scheme, put players in position to make plays. After that it's up to the young men in question.

Then, ultimately, it comes back to one man. Bowden.

He told the press he knew what he wanted in his next hires, and apparently these are the coordinators who best fit his criteria. As the captain of the ship, it's his call.

Now all we can do is wait for the smoke to clear, the discussion to pass, and the team to hit the field for spring practice.

Then, and only then, will these early questions about 2005 begin to be answered.

Spence By the Numbers


Total Offense

Rank Name Gms Plys Yds Avg TD Ydspgm W L

2004 11 Toledo 13 976 5970 6.12 58 459.23 9 4

2003 11 Toledo 12 875 5553 6.35 55 462.75 8 4

2002 5 Toledo 14 1033 6611 6.40 66 472.21 9 5

2001 13 Toledo 11 822 4889 5.95 50 444.45 9 2

2004 110 Clemson 11 735 3252 4.42 27 295.64 6 5

Scoring Offense

Rank Name Gms Pts Avg TD

2004 15 Toledo 13 432 33.23 58

2003 24 Toledo 12 389 32.42 55

2002 11 Toledo 14 495 35.36 66

2001 16 Toledo 11 384 34.91 50

2004 90 Clemson 11 236 21.45 27

Passing Offense

Rank Name Games Pat Pcom Int Papct Yds Yatt TD Ydspgm

2004 8 Toledo 13 449 308 10 68.60 3879 8.64 28 298.4

2003 19 Toledo 12 423 298 8 70.45 3339 7.89 29 278.3

2002 29 Toledo 14 443 309 9 69.75 3611 8.15 25 257.9

2001 52 Toledo 11 327 219 8 66.97 2541 7.77 18 231.0

2004 78 Clemson 11 355 178 17 50.14 2069 5.83 7 188.1

Rushing Offense

Rank Name Games Car Net Avg. TD Ydspg W L

2004 53 Toledo 13 527 2091 3.97 26 160.85 9 4

2003 28 Toledo 12 452 2214 4.90 22 184.50 8 4

2002 16 Toledo 14 590 3000 5.08 38 214.29 9 5

2001 17 Toledo 11 495 2348 4.74 30 213.45 9 2

2004 100 Clemson 11 380 1183 3.11 15 107.55 6 5

Passing Efficiency

Rank Name Gms Att Com Papct Int Yds Yatt TD TD Pct Rating

2004 8 Toledo 13 449 308 68.60 10 3879 8.64 28 6.24 157.29

2003 6 Toledo 12 423 298 70.45 8 3339 7.89 29 6.86 155.55

2002 3 Toledo 14 443 309 69.75 9 3611 8.15 25 5.64 152.83

2001 11 Toledo 11 327 219 66.97 8 2541 7.77 18 5.50 145.55

2004 113 Clemson 11 355 178 50.14 17 2069 5.83 7 1.97 95.99

Koenning By the Numbers


Turnovers Gained

Rank Turnovers Gained

2002 59 Troy St. 25

2003 6 Troy St. 35

2004 2 Troy 32

2004 97 Clemson 16

Rushing Defense

Rank Name Gms Car Net Avg TD Ydspgm W L

2002 13 Troy St. 12 456 1263 2.77 9 105.3 4 8

2003 28 Troy St. 12 438 1506 3.44 20 125.5 6 6

2004 8 Troy 12 444 1211 2.73 12 100.9 7 5

2004 41 Clemson 11 466 1492 3.20 15 135.6 6 5

Ultimate Level LogoUpgrade Your Account

Unlock premium boards and exclusive features (e.g. ad-free) by upgrading your account today.

Upgrade Now
Print   
Send Feedback to Dan Scott: Email | Comment
Where Clemson's remaining NFL draft prospects stand going into Day 2
Where Clemson's remaining NFL draft prospects stand going into Day 2
Four ACC players selected in first round of 2024 NFL Draft
Four ACC players selected in first round of 2024 NFL Draft
Clemson’s Nate Wiggins picked in NFL draft first round
Clemson’s Nate Wiggins picked in NFL draft first round
Clemson guard enters transfer portal
Clemson guard enters transfer portal